| Literature DB >> 28459119 |
Nimisha Jain1, Tulika Tripathi2, S K Gupta3, Priyank Rai4, Anup Kanase4, Shilpa Kalra4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Determination of skeletal maturation and remaining growth potential is an essential part of treatment planning in orthodontics. The aim of our study was to determine the relationship between IGF-1 levels, IGFBP-3 levels with CVM staging to track the pre pubertal and pubertal growth spurts in female patients in North Indian population.Entities:
Keywords: Biochemical growth marker; IGF-1; IGFBP-3
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28459119 PMCID: PMC5410418 DOI: 10.1186/s40510-017-0165-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prog Orthod ISSN: 1723-7785 Impact factor: 2.750
Means and standard deviations of serum IGF-1, IGFBP-3 and their ratio at each CVMI stage
| CVMI Stage |
| Mean | IGF-1 | IGFBP-3 | Mean | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||||
| 1 (Initiation) | 15 | 8.5 | 180.9 | 15.9 | 3056 | 1087.6 | 0.066 |
| 2 (Acceleration) | 15 | 9.3 | 208.4 | 10.2 | 3572.1 | 1209.4 | 0.064 |
| 3 (Transition) | 15 | 11.5 | 403.3 | 12.3 | 4952.9 | 1169.8 | 0.084 |
| 4 (Deceleration) | 15 | 14.4 | 332.4 | 12.8 | 5186.8 | 1384.2 | 0.068 |
| 5 (Maturation) | 15 | 16.1 | 294.5 | 10.9 | 3984.1 | 1176.2 | 0.079 |
| 6 (Completion) | 15 | 19.2 | 208.4 | 10 | 3599.5 | 1113.8 | 0.062 |
Graph 1Mean Serum levels of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 at each CVMI stage
1-way ANOVA showing IGF-1, IGFBP-3 and their ratio differences’ between and within the CVMI stages
| Sum of squares | df | Mean square |
| Sig. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum IGF-1 (ng/ml) | Between Groups | 566437.3 | 5 | 113287.4 | 757.07 | 0.000(**) |
| Within Groups | 12569.5 | 84 | 149.6 | |||
| Total | 579006.9 | 89 | ||||
| Serum IGFBP-3 (ng/ml) | Between Groups | 5.29 | 5 | 1.05 | 7.42 | 0.000(**) |
| Within Groups | 1.19 | 84 | 1425822.1 | |||
| Total | 1.72 | 89 | ||||
| IGF-1/IGFBP-3 Ratio | Between Groups | 0.006 | 5 | 0.001 | 2.77 | 0.023(*) |
| Within Groups | 0.037 | 84 | 0.000 | |||
| Total | 0.043 | 89 | ||||
(*) Significant (P < 0.05)
(**) Highly significant (P < 0.01, P < 0.001)
The Post-hoc analysis (least significant difference) comparing IGF-1 serum levels for each of the 6 CVMI stages
| CVMI Stage | CVMI Stage | Mean Difference | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | −27.5* | 0.000(**) |
| 3 | −222.3* | 0.000(**) | |
| 4 | −151.5* | 0.000(**) | |
| 5 | −113.6* | 0.000(**) | |
| 6 | −27.5* | 0.000(**) | |
| 2 | 1 | 27.5* | 0.000(**) |
| 3 | −194.8* | 0.000(**) | |
| 4 | −123.9* | 0.000(**) | |
| 5 | −86.07* | 0.000(**) | |
| 6 | −.02 | 0.996(NS) | |
| 3 | 1 | 222.3* | 0.000(**) |
| 2 | 194.8* | 0.000(**) | |
| 4 | 70.8* | 0.000(**) | |
| 5 | 108.7* | 0.000(**) | |
| 6 | 194.8* | 0.000(**) | |
| 4 | 1 | 151.5* | 0.000(**) |
| 2 | 123.9* | 0.000(**) | |
| 3 | −70.8* | 0.000(**) | |
| 5 | 37.9* | 0.000(**) | |
| 6 | 123.9* | 0.000(**) | |
| 5 | 1 | 113.6* | 0.000(**) |
| 2 | 86.07* | 0.000(**) | |
| 3 | −108.7* | 0.000(**) | |
| 4 | −37.9* | 0.000(**) | |
| 6 | 86.04* | 0.000(**) | |
| 6 | 1 | 27.5* | 0.000(**) |
| 2 | 0.02 | 0.996(NS) | |
| 3 | −194.8* | 0.000(**) | |
| 4 | −123.9* | 0.000(**) | |
| 5 | −86.04* | 0.000(**) |
(**) Highly significant (P < 0.01, P < 0.001),(*) Significant (P < 0.05), NS (Non significant)
The Post-hoc analysis (least significant difference) comparing IGFBP-3 serum levels for each of the 6 CVMI stages
| CVMI Stage | CVMI stage | Mean Difference | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | -516.1 | 0.240(NS) |
| 3 | -1896.9* | 0.000(**) | |
| 4 | -2130.8* | 0.000(**) | |
| 5 | -928.1* | 0.036(*) | |
| 6 | -543.5 | 0.216(NS) | |
| 2 | 1 | 516.1 | 0.240(NS) |
| 3 | -1380.8* | 0.002(**) | |
| 4 | -1614.6* | 0.000(**) | |
| 5 | -411.9 | 0.347(NS) | |
| 6 | -27.4 | 0.950(NS) | |
| 3 | 1 | 1896.9* | 0.000(**) |
| 2 | 1380.8* | 0.002(**) | |
| 4 | -233.8 | 0.593(NS) | |
| 5 | 968.8* | 0.029(**) | |
| 6 | 1353.4* | 0.003(**) | |
| 4 | 1 | 2130.8* | 0.000(**) |
| 2 | 1614.6* | 0.000(**) | |
| 3 | 233.8 | 0.593(NS) | |
| 5 | 1202.7* | 0.007(**) | |
| 6 | 1587.2* | 0.000(**) | |
| 5 | 1 | 928.1* | 0.036(*) |
| 2 | 411.9 | 0.347(NS) | |
| 3 | -968.8* | 0.029(*) | |
| 4 | -1202.7* | 0.007(**) | |
| 6 | 384.5 | 0.380(NS) | |
| 6 | 1 | 543.5 | 0.216(NS) |
| 2 | 27.4 | 0.950(NS) | |
| 3 | -1353.4* | 0.003(**) | |
| 4 | -1587.2* | 0.000(**) | |
| 5 | -384.5 | 0.380(NS) |
(**) Highly significant (P < 0.01, P < 0.001), (*)Significant (P < 0.05)
NS Not Significant
Pearson’s Correlations of IGF-1, IGFBP-3 and their ratio
| Serum IGF-1 (ng/ml) | Serum IGFBP-3 (ng/ml) | IGF-1/IGFBP-3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum IGF-1 (ng/ml) | Pearson Correlation | 1 | 0.529** | 0.297** |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.0 | 0.005 | ||
| N | 90 | 90 | 90 | |
| Serum IGFBP-3 (ng/ml) | Pearson Correlation | 0.529** | 1 | -0.609** |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
| N | 90 | 90 | 90 | |
| IGF-1/IGFBP-3 Ratio | Pearson Correlation | 0.297** | -0.609** | 1 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.005 | 0.0 | ||
| N | 90 | 90 | 90 | |
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)
Post-hoc analysis (least significant difference) comparing ratio of serum IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 for each of the six CVMI stages
| CVMI Stage | CVMI stage | Mean difference | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | .001 | 0.8(NS) |
| 3 | −.018* | 0.01(NS) | |
| 4 | −.001 | 0.8(NS) | |
| 5 | −.012 | 0.09(NS) | |
| 6 | .003 | 0.6(NS) | |
| 2 | 1 | −.001 | 0.8(NS) |
| 3 | −.020* | 0.009(**) | |
| 4 | −.003 | 0.6(NS) | |
| 5 | −.014 | 0.05(NS) | |
| 6 | .001 | 0.8(NS) | |
| 3 | 1 | .018* | 0.016(*) |
| 2 | .020* | 0.009(**) | |
| 4 | .016* | 0.029(*) | |
| 5 | .005 | 0.4(NS) | |
| 6 | .022* | 0.005(**) | |
| 4 | 1 | .001 | 0.8(NS) |
| 2 | .003 | 0.6(NS) | |
| 3 | −.016* | 0.029(*) | |
| 5 | −.011 | 0.1(NS) | |
| 6 | .005 | 0.4(NS) | |
| 5 | 1 | .012 | 0.09(NS) |
| 2 | .014 | 0.05(NS) | |
| 3 | −.005 | 0.4(NS) | |
| 4 | .011 | 0.1(NS) | |
| 6 | .016* | 0.035(*) | |
| 6 | 1 | −.003 | 0.6(NS) |
| 2 | −.001 | 0.8(NS) | |
| 3 | −.022* | 0.005(**) | |
| 4 | −.005 | 0.4(NS) | |
| 5 | −.016* | 0.035(*) |
(*) Significant (P < 0.05)
(**) Highly significant (P < 0.01, P < 0.001)
NS not Significant