Literature DB >> 26124026

Growth modification of the face: A current perspective with emphasis on Class III treatment.

Hugo J De Clerck1, William R Proffit2.   

Abstract

A summary of the current status of modification of jaw growth indicates the following. 1. Transverse expansion of the maxilla is easy before adolescence, requires heavy forces to create microfractures during adolescence, and can be accomplished only with partial or complete surgical osteotomy after adolescence. Transverse expansion of the mandible or constriction of either jaw requires surgery. 2. Acceleration of mandibular growth in preadolescent or adolescent patients can be achieved, but slower than normal growth afterward reduces or eliminates a long-term increase in size of the mandible. Restraint of maxillary growth occurs with all types of appliances to correct skeletal Class II problems. For short-face Class II patients, increasing the face height during preadolescent or adolescent orthodontic treatment is possible, but it may make the Class II problem worse unless favorable anteroposterior growth occurs. For those with a long face, controlling excessive vertical growth during adolescence is rarely successful. 3. Attempts to restrain mandibular growth in Class III patients with external forces largely result in downward and backward rotation of the mandible. Moving the maxilla forward with external force is possible before adolescence; moving it forward and simultaneously restricting forward mandibular growth without rotating the jaw is possible during adolescence with intermaxillary traction to bone anchors. The amount of skeletal change with this therapy often extends to the midface, and the short-term effects on both jaws are greater than with previous approaches, but individual variations in the amount of maxillary vs mandibular response occur, and it still is not possible to accurately predict the outcome for a patient. For all types of growth modification, 3-dimensional imaging to distinguish skeletal changes and better biomarkers or genetic identification of patient types to indicate likely treatment responses are needed.
Copyright © 2015 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26124026     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  8 in total

1.  Very early orthodontic treatment: when, why and how?

Authors:  Ute E M Schneider-Moser; Lorenz Moser
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2022-06-10

2.  [Meta-analysis of the efficacy of bone anchorage and maxillary facemask protraction devices in treating skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion in adolescents].

Authors:  Hui Shi; Hong-Shan Ge; Lu-Yi Chen; Zhi-Hua Li
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-02-01

Review 3.  The Effect of Chin-cup Therapy in Class III Malocclusion: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sophia Mousoulea; Ioannis Tsolakis; Efstratios Ferdianakis; Apostolos I Tsolakis
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2016-12-09

Review 4.  Developing Class III malocclusions: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Edlira Zere; Prabhat Kumar Chaudhari; Jitendra Sharan; Kunaal Dhingra; Nitesh Tiwari
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2018-06-22

5.  Dentoalveolar compensation in different anterioposterior and vertical skeletal malocclusions.

Authors:  Maged-Sultan Alhammadi
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-08-01

6.  Effectiveness of Tongue Crib Combination Treating Severe Skeletal Angle Class III Malocclusion in Mixed Dentition.

Authors:  Wenting Zhao; Yan Chen; Hee-Moon Kyung; Jin-Shuai Xu
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec

7.  Association of Salivary IGF and IGF/IGFBP-3 Molar Ratio with Cervical Vertebral Maturation Stages from Pre-Adolescent to Post-Adolescent Transition Period-A Cross-Sectional Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Abdullah Almalki
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Interceptive Treatment with Invisalign® First in Moderate and Severe Cases: A Case Series.

Authors:  Teresa Pinho; Duarte Rocha; Sofia Ribeiro; Francisca Monteiro; Selma Pascoal; Rui Azevedo
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.