| Literature DB >> 35563248 |
Dominik Tarabasz1, Paweł Szczeblewski2, Tomasz Laskowski2, Wojciech Płaziński3,4, Ewa Baranowska-Wójcik5, Dominik Szwajgier5, Wirginia Kukula-Koch1, Henry O Meissner6.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to present the fingerprint of different Lepidium peruvianum tuber extracts showing glucosinolates-containing substances possibly playing an important role in preventinting dementia and other memory disorders. Different phenotypes of Lepidium peruvianum (Brassicaceae) tubers were analysed for their glucosinolate profile using a liquid chromatograph coupled with mass spectrometer (HPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS platform). Qualitative analysis in 50% ethanolic extracts confirmed the presence of ten compounds: aliphatic, indolyl, and aromatic glucosinolates, with glucotropaeolin being the leading one, detected at levels between 0-1.57% depending on phenotype, size, processing, and collection site. The PCA analysis showed important variations in glucosinolate content between the samples and different ratios of the detected compounds. Applied in vitro activity tests confirmed inhibitory properties of extracts and single glucosinolates against acetylcholinesterase (AChE) (15.3-28.9% for the extracts and 55.95-57.60% for individual compounds) and butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE) (71.3-77.2% for the extracts and 36.2-39.9% for individual compounds). The molecular basis for the activity of glucosinolates was explained through molecular docking studies showing that the tested metabolites interacted with tryptophan and histidine residues of the enzymes, most likely blocking their active catalytic side. Based on the obtained results and described mechanism of action, it could be concluded that glucosinolates exhibit inhibitory properties against two cholinesterases present in the synaptic cleft, which indicates that selected phenotypes of L. peruvianum tubers cultivated under well-defined environmental and ecological conditions may present a valuable plant material to be considered for the development of therapeutic products with memory-stimulating properties.Entities:
Keywords: AChE and BuChE inhibition; HPLC-MS; PCA; maca tubers; modelling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35563248 PMCID: PMC9101689 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23094858
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1General structure of glucosinolates, the group R is variable.
The composition of the 50% EtOH (v/v) extract from tubers of black A variety of Lepidium peruvianum recorded in the negative ionization mode. (RDB—rings and double bond number, delta—error of mass measurement, ion—ionization mode: positive or negative, ND—not detected). Compounds depicted in bold were subjects of chemometric considerations.
| No. | Ion. (+/−) | Rt (min) | Molecular | Delta (ppm) | RDB | MS/MS | Proposed Compound | References | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | 1.88 | C6H12O7 | 195.051 | 195.052 | −4.97 | 1 | 159, 129 | Gluconic acid | [ |
| 2 | - | 2.06 | C4H6O5 | 133.0142 | 133.0142 | 0.35 | 2 | 115 | Malic acid | [ |
| 3 | - | 2.79 | C6H8O7 | 191.0197 | 191.0209 | −6.11 | 3 | 155, 111 | Citric Acid | [ |
| 4 | - | 3.09 | C4H6O4 | 117.0199 | 117.0193 | −4.81 | 2 | Succinic acid | [ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [ | |
| 9 | - | 15.43 | C11H18N2O4 | 241.1194 | 241.1199 | −2.15 | 4 | 197 | Pyroglutamylleucine | [ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [ |
| 12 | - | 16.8 | C15H29O10NS2 | 446.1154 | 446.1116 | 9.87 | 2 | ND | Indolyl-5-methylglucosinolate (IMG) | [ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [ |
| 16 | - | 20.3 | C11H10O6 | 237.0405 | 237.0406 | −0.58 | 7 | 121 | Malic acid benzoate | [ |
| 17 | - | 20.35 | C7H602 | 121.03 | 121.0295 | −4.07 | 5 | ND | Benzoic acid derivative | [ |
| 18 | - | 20.35 | C24H18O12 | 497.0725 | 497.0697 | 5.72 | 16 | 381, 237 | Fucodiphlorethol | [ |
| 19 | - | 25.6 | C18H32O5 | 327.2177 | 327.2195 | −5.49 | 3 | 229, 171 | Trihydroxy-(3)-octadecadienoic acid | [ |
| 20 | - | 26.9 | C18H34O5 | 329.2333 | 329.2363 | −8.94 | 2 | 211, 171 | Pinellic acid (9(S),12(S),13(S)-Trihydroxy-10(E)-octadecenoic acid) | [ |
Figure 2PCA performed for the ABS dataset. Diagonal: histograms of the first three resulting PCs subjected to VARIMAX rotation (henceforth known as dimensions, Dim). Lower triangle: linear maps of samples in the space of the first three dimensions. Upper triangle: linear maps of original variables (compounds) in the space of the first three dimensions. The numbers correspond to the numbering presented in the Section 3.1.
Figure 3Cluster dendrogram prepared on the basis of the ABS dataset.
Figure 4PCA performed for the REL dataset. Diagonal: histograms of the first three resulting PCs subjected to VARIMAX rotation (henceforth known as dimensions, Dim1). Lower triangle: linear maps of samples in the space of the first three dimensions. Upper triangle: linear maps of original variables (compounds) in the space of the first three dimensions.
Figure 5Cluster dendrogram prepared on the basis of the REL dataset.
The results of the quantitative determination of glucotropaeolin in the studied extracts (green color corresponds with the highest quantity of G2 in the extracts, wheras red colour shows the samples with the lowest calculated content).
| No | Sample Code | Percentage Content | SD | No | Sample Code | Percentage Content | SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BL_A-J | 1.514 | 0.17 | 20 | GR_C-J | 1.513 | 0.10 |
| 2 | BL_B-J | 0.954 | 0.08 | 21 | GR_D-J | 1.301 | 0.12 |
| 3 | BL_C-J | 0.632 | 0.05 | 22 | GR_X-J | 0.540 | 0.05 |
| 4 | BL_D-J | 0.875 | 0.10 | 23 | GR_Z-J | 1.362 | 0.16 |
| 5 | BL_X-J | 0.270 | 0.02 | 24 | GR_JU | ND | 0.00 |
| 6 | BL_Z-J | 0.337 | 0.03 | 25 | PU_A-J | 0.214 | 0.03 |
| 7 | BL_JU | ND | 0.00 | 26 | PU_B1-J | 0.078 | 0.01 |
| 8 | CH | 0.081 | 0.01 | 27 | PU_B2-J | 0.239 | 0.02 |
| 9 | BL_gel-AN | 0.624 | 0.08 | 28 | PU_C-J | 1.572 | 0.16 |
| 10 | MIX_gel-AN | ND | 0.00 | 29 | PU_D-J | 1.155 | 0.09 |
| 11 | BL_Bp-AN | 0.965 | 0.11 | 30 | PU_JU | ND | 0.00 |
| 12 | RE_Bp-J | 0.923 | 0.09 | 31 | YE_A-J | 0.749 | 0.07 |
| 13 | RE_LA-J | 0.344 | 0.02 | 32 | YE_B-J | 0.850 | 0.09 |
| 14 | RE_LAgel | 0.061 | 0.01 | 33 | YE_B2 | 0.850 | 0.06 |
| 15 | RE_gel_AN | 0.103 | 0.01 | 34 | YE_D-J | 0.474 | 0.03 |
| 16 | RE_SM | 0.242 | 0.02 | 35 | YE_JU | ND | 0.00 |
| 17 | GR_A-J | 0.518 | 0.04 | 36 | YE_Z-J | 1.195 | 0.14 |
| 18 | GR_B1-J | 1.040 | 0.09 | 37 | YE_B2 | 0.850 | 0.06 |
| 19 | GR_B2-J | 0.804 | 0.06 |
The average results of anti-enzymatic assays for the total extracts and the reference compounds, measured spectrophotometrically in the modified Ellman’s tests.
| BuChE | AChE | |
|---|---|---|
| % inhibition by the total extracts | ||
| BL_A-J | 77.2 | 24.1 |
| BL_B-J | 77.2 | 22.5 |
| BL_C-J | 77.2 | 22.5 |
| BL_D-J | 73.7 | 19.3 |
| BL_Z-J | 72.5 | 19.3 |
| BL_B-J | 77.2 | 22.5 |
| RE_B-J | 71.3 | 28.9 |
| GR_B-J | 76.0 | 17.0 |
| YE_B-J | 75.7 | 15.3 |
| % inhibition by the reference compounds | ||
| GL | 37.05 | 56.5 |
| GTP | 36.2 | 55.95 |
| GB | 39.9 | 57.6 |
| GS | 38.9 | 56.9 |
| % inhibition by a positive control | ||
| Berberine (0.5 mg/mL) | 33.7 | - |
The collection of the binding energies during docking study; the calculation results were averaged over all structures available in the same PDB record; the corresponding standard deviations are given.
| Compound | Binding Energy (kcal/mol) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| AChE | BuChE XRD | BuChE Homology Model | |
|
| −9.1 | −8.5 ± 0.1 | −8.0 |
|
| −9.2 | −8.2 ± 0.3 | −7.5 |
|
| −9.0 | −8.5 ± 0.3 | −7.9 |
|
| −9.6 | −9.4 ± 0.3 | −9.1 |
|
| −7.9 | −7.2 ± 0.2 | −7.0 |
|
| −9.5 | −9.3 ± 0.4 | −8.9 |
|
| −8.9 | −9.0 ± 0.2 | −8.9 |
|
| −8.2 | −7.3 ± 0.1 | −6.7 |
|
| −9.6 | −10.2 ± 0.5 | −10.3 |
|
| −5.8 | −4.9 ± 0.2 | −4.9 |
Figure 6(A) Correlation between the average binding energies determined for X-ray crystal structure (XRD) of BuChE and the molecular volume of studied compounds. (B) Correlation between binding energies obtained for X-ray crystal structure (XRD) of human BuChE and homology model (HM) of equine BuChE. (C) Correlation of binding energies determined for AChE and BuChE and the same set of ligands. Determination coefficients are given as well.
Figure 7(A,B) The graphical illustration of the validation results, i.e., the superposition of the most favorable ligand poses found during docking (colored in red) with the position of the co-crystalized ligand, present in the binding cavity of AChE (A) or BuChE (B) (colored by atom type). (C,D) The superposition of the most favorable poses of all ligands interacting with either AChE (C) or BuChE (D). The selected amino acids creating the most essential ligand–protein contacts are given separately for each of ligand moieties. (E,F) The most favorable location of compound glucotropaeolin molecule bound to either the AChE (E) or BuChE (F) structure. The ligand molecule is shown as thick sticks, whereas all the closest amino acid residues (of distances no larger than 0.4 nm) are represented by thin sticks. The description of the interaction types is given in the text.
Plant material: coding, description and sampling details prior to delivery to Laboratory Lublin.
| No | Sample Code | Sample Description | Specimen Collection Location | Sampling Year | Time of Collection | No | Sample Code | Sample Description | Specimen Collection Location | Sampling Year | Time of Collection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BL_A-J | Dried black Large tubers size A (Smaller than X) | Junín (J-19) Maca plantation, Peruvian Andean highlands * | 8 October 2019 | Between 11am and 2pm local time in Peru | 20 | GR_C-J | Dried grey tubers size C (smaller than B) | Junín (J-19) | 8 October 2019 | Between 10am and 2 pm local Peruvian time |
| 2 | BL_B -J | Dried black tubers size B (Smaller than A) | 21 | GR_D-J | Dried grey tubers size D (smaller than C) | ||||||
| 3 | BL_C-J | Dried black tubers size C (Smaller than B) | 22 | GR_X-J | Dried grey tubers size X- Extra Large (larger than A) | ||||||
| 4 | BL_D-J | Dried black tubers size D (Smaller than C) | 23 | GR_Z-J | Dried grey tubers size E (very small–smaller than D) | ||||||
| 5 | BL_X-J | Dried black tubers size Extra Large (X) | 24 | GR_JU | Squeezed juice from fresh grey maca tubers (fresh size A) | ||||||
| 6 | BL_Z-J | Dried black tubers size E (smaller than D) | 25 | PU_A-J | Dried PURPLE maca tubers size A | ||||||
| 7 | BL_JU | Pressed juice from fresh black tubers (BL A-J and B-J) | 6 | PU_B-J | Dried PURPLE maca tubers size B (smaller than A) | ||||||
| 8 | CH | Semi-dried dark violet tubers purchased by maca contractor from unknown sources/location origin not known | Tarma (J-17) * | 30 September 2017 | 3 p.m. | 27 | PU_B2-J | Dried PURPLE maca tubers size B-1-Replicate (smaller than A) | |||
| 9 | BL_gel-AN | Organic gelatinized BLACK maca tubers, sampled and dried in Ancash and processed in Lima | Ancash (A-17) | Mid-October 2017 | Between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. local Peruvian time | 28 | PU_C-J | Dried purple maca tubers size C (smaller than B) | |||
| 10 | MIX_gel-AN | Organic gelatinized tubers of MIXED maca phenotypes | 29 | PU_D-J | Dried purple tubers size D (smaller than C) | ||||||
| 11 | BL_Bp-AN | Organic BLACK tubersopen- air dried on site and pulverised in Lima processing plant | 30 | PU_X-J | Dried purple tubers size X Extra Large (larger than A) | ||||||
| 12 | RE_Bp-J | RED tubers size B dried and powdered-as per above | Junín (J-17) | 31 | PU_JU | Squeezed juice from fresh purple tubers | |||||
| 13 | RE_LA-J | RED maca large powdered tubers size A | 32 | YE_A-J | Dried yellow tubers size A | ||||||
| 14 | RE_LA gel | RED maca large tubers size A—gelatinised powder | 33 | YE_B-J | Dried yellow tubers size B (smaller than A) | ||||||
| 15 | RE_gel AN | organic gelatinized RED maca powder Maca Plantation Cordillera Blanca, Peruvian Andes | Ancash. (A-17) Cordillera Blanca Peruvian Andes | 34 | YE_B2-J | Dried yellow tubers size B2—Replicate B (smaller than A) | |||||
| 16 | RE_SM-J | RED maca small tubers –powder | Junín (J-17) | 35 | YE_D-J | Dried yellow tubers size D (smaller than C) | |||||
| 17 | GR_A-J | Dried grey tubers size A | Junín (J-19) | 8 October 2019 | 36 | YE_JU | Squeezed juice from fresh yellow tubers size A | ||||
| 18 | GR_B1-J | Dried grey tubers size B (smaller than A) | 37 | YE_Z-J | Dried yellow tubers size E (smaller than size D) Extra small | ||||||
| 19 | GR_B2-J | Dried grey tubers size B (smaller than A) |
* Tubers from commercial drying yard in Tarma (Junín) on 30 September 2017.
Figure 8An example of distribution of black maca tubers allocated to size classes dependent on physical size and weight in the black phenotype of L. peruvianum synon. L. meyenii).