Literature DB >> 35559977

Survey of industrial perceptions for the use of nanomaterials for in-home drinking water purification devices.

Justin Kidd1, Paul Westerhoff2, Andrew Maynard3.   

Abstract

As businesses, specifically technology developers and industrial suppliers, strive to meet growing demand for higher quality drinking water, the use of engineered nanomaterials in commercial point-of-use (POU) in-home water purification devices are becoming an increasingly important option. Anecdotally, some businesses appear wary of developing and marketing nanomaterial-enabled devices because of concerns that they will face onerous regulation and consumer pushback. However, little of substance is known about business perceptions of and attitudes toward the use of engineered nanomaterials in POU water purification devices, or how these compare with consumer perceptions. To address this knowledge-gap, we administered a 14-question survey among 65 participants from US-based industrial companies focused on drinking water purification. Our results indicate that the dominant concerns for businesses are costs and public perceptions associated with nanomaterial-enabled POU devices for drinking water purification. Cost-specific barriers include competition from more conventional technologies, and tensions between operational versus capital costs. 57% of respondents were concerned or very concerned that public perceptions will influence the long-term viability of nanomaterial-enabled POU devices for drinking water purification. 49% of respondents stated that government regulation of nanomaterials would be the preferred approach to ensure public safety, followed by the certification of POU devices (28%). When asked about specific nanomaterials and their potential use in POU devices for drinking water purification, respondents ranked carbon nanotubes as the nanomaterial with highest concern for environmental health and safety, followed by silver, titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, and copper. Respondents ranked nanoclays as the nanomaterial with highest likelihood for public acceptance, followed by silica, cerium oxide, titanium dioxide, and aluminum oxide. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drinking water; Industry perception; Nanomaterials; Point-of-use; Public perception; Water treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 35559977      PMCID: PMC9106971          DOI: 10.1016/j.impact.2021.100320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NanoImpact        ISSN: 2452-0748


  15 in total

Review 1.  Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades.

Authors:  Mark A Shannon; Paul W Bohn; Menachem Elimelech; John G Georgiadis; Benito J Mariñas; Anne M Mayes
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  A novel point-of-use water treatment method by antimicrobial nanosilver textile material.

Authors:  Hongjun Liu; Xiaosheng Tang; Qishan Liu
Journal:  J Water Health       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.744

3.  Lack of significant dermal penetration of titanium dioxide from sunscreen formulations containing nano- and submicron-size TiO2 particles.

Authors:  Nakissa Sadrieh; Anna M Wokovich; Neera V Gopee; Jiwen Zheng; Diana Haines; David Parmiter; Paul H Siitonen; Christy R Cozart; Anil K Patri; Scott E McNeil; Paul C Howard; William H Doub; Lucinda F Buhse
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Survey of industrial perceptions for the use of nanomaterials for in-home drinking water purification devices.

Authors:  Justin Kidd; Paul Westerhoff; Andrew Maynard
Journal:  NanoImpact       Date:  2021-04-29

5.  Oral intake of added titanium dioxide and its nanofraction from food products, food supplements and toothpaste by the Dutch population.

Authors:  Cathy Rompelberg; Minne B Heringa; Gerda van Donkersgoed; José Drijvers; Agnes Roos; Susanne Westenbrink; Ruud Peters; Greet van Bemmel; Walter Brand; Agnes G Oomen
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.913

6.  Potential Effectiveness of Point-of-Use Filtration to Address Risks to Drinking Water in the United States.

Authors:  Kathleen Ward Brown; Bemnet Gessesse; Lindsey J Butler; David L MacIntosh
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2017-12-12

7.  Effectiveness of Devices to Monitor Biofouling and Metals Deposition on Plumbing Materials Exposed to a Full-Scale Drinking Water Distribution System.

Authors:  Maneesha P Ginige; Scott Garbin; Jason Wylie; K C Bal Krishna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Metals in Occluded Water: A New Perspective for Pollution in Drinking Water Distribution Systems.

Authors:  Huiyan Tong; Zhongyue Li; Xingshuai Hu; Weiping Xu; Zhengkun Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Bactericidal assessment of nano-silver on emerging and re-emerging human pathogens.

Authors:  Samir A Anuj; Harsukh P Gajera; Darshna G Hirpara; Baljibhai A Golakiya
Journal:  J Trace Elem Med Biol       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.849

Review 10.  Global assessment of exposure to faecal contamination through drinking water based on a systematic review.

Authors:  Robert Bain; Ryan Cronk; Rifat Hossain; Sophie Bonjour; Kyle Onda; Jim Wright; Hong Yang; Tom Slaymaker; Paul Hunter; Annette Prüss-Ustün; Jamie Bartram
Journal:  Trop Med Int Health       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.622

View more
  4 in total

1.  Survey of industrial perceptions for the use of nanomaterials for in-home drinking water purification devices.

Authors:  Justin Kidd; Paul Westerhoff; Andrew Maynard
Journal:  NanoImpact       Date:  2021-04-29

2.  Implementation of Micro-EDM Monitoring System to Fabricate Antimicrobial Nanosilver Colloid.

Authors:  Kuo-Hsiung Tseng; Meng-Yun Chung; Juei-Long Chiu
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.523

3.  Public Perceptions and Willingness-to-Pay for Nanopesticides.

Authors:  Peiyuan Liu; Xiaodong Zheng; Shuangyue Shangguan; Lina Zhao; Xiangming Fang; Yuxiong Huang; Slav W Hermanowicz
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 5.719

4.  Renal transcriptome profiles in mice reveal the need for sufficient water intake irrespective of the drinking water type.

Authors:  Woo-Jeong Shon; Mi-Na Park; Jooyoung Lee; Ji-Hee Shin; Dong-Mi Shin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.