Literature DB >> 23692056

A protocol for better design, application, and communication of population viability analyses.

Guy Pe'er1, Yiannis G Matsinos, Karin Johst, Kamila W Franz, Camille Turlure, Viktoriia Radchuk, Agnieszka H Malinowska, Janelle M R Curtis, Ilona Naujokaitis-Lewis, Brendan A Wintle, Klaus Henle.   

Abstract

Population viability analyses (PVAs) contribute to conservation theory, policy, and management. Most PVAs focus on single species within a given landscape and address a specific problem. This specificity often is reflected in the organization of published PVA descriptions. Many lack structure, making them difficult to understand, assess, repeat, or use for drawing generalizations across PVA studies. In an assessment comparing published PVAs and existing guidelines, we found that model selection was rarely justified; important parameters remained neglected or their implementation was described vaguely; limited details were given on parameter ranges, sensitivity analysis, and scenarios; and results were often reported too inconsistently to enable repeatability and comparability. Although many guidelines exist on how to design and implement reliable PVAs and standards exist for documenting and communicating ecological models in general, there is a lack of organized guidelines for designing, applying, and communicating PVAs that account for their diversity of structures and contents. To fill this gap, we integrated published guidelines and recommendations for PVA design and application, protocols for documenting ecological models in general and individual-based models in particular, and our collective experience in developing, applying, and reviewing PVAs. We devised a comprehensive protocol for the design, application, and communication of PVAs (DAC-PVA), which has 3 primary elements. The first defines what a useful PVA is; the second element provides a workflow for the design and application of a useful PVA and highlights important aspects that need to be considered during these processes; and the third element focuses on communication of PVAs to ensure clarity, comprehensiveness, repeatability, and comparability. Thereby, DAC-PVA should strengthen the credibility and relevance of PVAs for policy and management, and improve the capacity to generalize PVA findings across studies.
© 2013 Society for Conservation Biology.

Keywords:  ciencia de la comunicación; documentación del modelo; ecological modeling; evaluación de riesgo; meta análisis; meta-analysis; model documentation; modelación ecológica; reportaje estandarizado; risk assessment; science communication; standardized reporting

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23692056     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  7 in total

1.  Genomic erosion in a demographically recovered bird species during conservation rescue.

Authors:  Hazel A Jackson; Lawrence Percival-Alwyn; Camilla Ryan; Mohammed F Albeshr; Luca Venturi; Hernán E Morales; Thomas C Mathers; Jonathan Cocker; Samuel A Speak; Gonzalo G Accinelli; Tom Barker; Darren Heavens; Faye Willman; Deborah Dawson; Lauren Ward; Vikash Tatayah; Nicholas Zuël; Richard Young; Lianne Concannon; Harriet Whitford; Bernardo Clavijo; Nancy Bunbury; Kevin M Tyler; Kevin Ruhomaun; Molly K Grace; Michael W Bruford; Carl G Jones; Simon Tollington; Diana J Bell; Jim J Groombridge; Matt Clark; Cock Van Oosterhout
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 7.563

2.  Nowhere to Go but Up: Impacts of Climate Change on Demographics of a Short-Range Endemic (Crotalus willardi obscurus) in the Sky-Islands of Southwestern North America.

Authors:  Mark A Davis; Marlis R Douglas; Colleen T Webb; Michael L Collyer; Andrew T Holycross; Charles W Painter; Larry K Kamees; Michael E Douglas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The importance of realistic dispersal models in conservation planning: application of a novel modelling platform to evaluate management scenarios in an Afrotropical biodiversity hotspot.

Authors:  Job Aben; Greta Bocedi; Stephen C F Palmer; Petri Pellikka; Diederik Strubbe; Caspar Hallmann; Justin M J Travis; Luc Lens; Erik Matthysen
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 6.528

4.  The abundance and persistence of Caprinae populations.

Authors:  Grant M Harris; Matthew J Butler; David R Stewart; James W Cain
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Ranking landscape development scenarios affecting natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) population dynamics in Central Poland.

Authors:  Kamila W Franz; Jerzy Romanowski; Karin Johst; Volker Grimm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Population Viability and Vital Rate Sensitivity of an Endangered Avian Cooperative Breeder, the White-Breasted Thrasher (Ramphocinclus brachyurus).

Authors:  Jennifer L Mortensen; J Michael Reed
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Advances in global sensitivity analyses of demographic-based species distribution models to address uncertainties in dynamic landscapes.

Authors:  Ilona Naujokaitis-Lewis; Janelle M R Curtis
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.