| Literature DB >> 29866035 |
Binxing Zhou1,2, Cunqiang Ma3,4, Hongzhen Wang5, Tao Xia6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pu-erh tea is a traditional Chinese tea and produced by natural solid-state fermentation. Several studies show that the natural microbiota influence caffeine level in pu-erh tea. Our previous research also found that the caffeine declined significantly (p < 0.05) in the fermentation, which suggested that the caffeine level could be influenced by specific strains. The purpose of this study was to isolate and identify microorganisms for caffeine degradation, and this research explored the degradation products from caffeine and optimal condition for caffeine degradation.Entities:
Keywords: Biodegradation; Caffeine; Fermentation; Fungi; Tea
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29866035 PMCID: PMC5987490 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-018-1194-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Growth of tea-derived fungi in agar solid medium (2% w/v) with glucose (2% w/v) (control culture) or presence of caffeine instead of glucose (30 °C, 5 d, pH 7.0)
| Tea-derived fungi | Strains growth (cm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control culture | 600 mg/L of caffeine | 1200 mg/L of caffeine | 1800 mg/L of caffeine | |
| No. 1 | 3.5 × 3.5 | 1.0 × 1.0 | 2.0 × 1.5 | 2.0 × 2.0 |
| No. 2 | 4.0 × 2.5 | 0.5 × 0.5 | 1.0 × 0.5 | 1.0 × 0.5 |
| No. 3 | 3.0 × 2.5 | 1.0 × 0.5 | 1.0 × 1.0 | 1.0 × 1.0 |
| No. 4 | 3.0 × 3.0 | no growth | 0.5 × 0.5 | 1.0 × 0.5 |
| No. 5 | 4.0 × 2.5 | 3.0 × 2.5 | 2.5 × 2.5 | 3.0 × 2.5 |
| No. 6 | 3.0 × 2.5 | 0.5 × 0.5 | 1.0 × 0.5 | 1.0 × 0.5 |
| No. 7 | 3.0 × 3.0 | no growth | 0.5 × 0.5 | 1.0 × 1.0 |
Quantitative biodegradation of caffeine by A. sydowii and A. niger on 5, 10 and 15th day
| Reaction time (d) | Fungal dry mass (g) | % of caffeine degraded b | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 431.5 ± 39.7 | 40.4 ± 1.0 | 28.1 ± 6.6 |
| 10 | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 134.8 ± 6.5 | 209.9 ± 22.6 | 77.5 ± 1.1 |
| 15 | 0.22 ± 0.01 | 3.7 ± 0.8 | 262.6 ± 20.7 | 99.4 ± 0.1 |
| 5 | 0.28 ± 0.03 | 592.6 ± 3.1 | NF | 1.2 ± 0.5 |
| 10 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 580.0 ± 2.9 | NF | 3.3 ± 0.5 |
| 15 | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 577.3 ± 6.0 | NF | 3.8 ± 1.0 |
aC Concentration determined by HPLC
b% of caffeine degraded was estimated as follow: of caffeine degraded = (C0-Ct)/C0*100% (1)
In Eq. (1) C0 was the initial caffeine concentration (mg/L), Ct was the final caffeine concentration (mg/L) after the fermentation
All data are presented as mean ± SD. NF not found
Fig. 1Changes in caffeine content and the fungal count of tea leaves during SSF. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. *,** and *** show the significant difference levels (p < 0.05) during the fermentation
Fig. 2Phylogenetic tree of the target strains (strains No. 5 and No.1)
Biodegradation products analysis of caffeine by A. sydowii NRRL250 in a liquid medium with 1200 mg/L of caffeine
| Reaction time (d) | % of caffeine degraded | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 994.9 ± 35.2 | 62.8 ± 11.3 | NF | 7.1 ± 2.9 |
| 6 | 804.1 ± 26.5 | 201.2 ± 8.4 | 28.4 ± 1.5 | 33.0 ± 2.2 |
| 9 | 566.3 ± 16.5 | 274.7 ± 14.7 | 38.4 ± 3.4 | 52.8 ± 1.4 |
| 12 | 375.3 ± 15.3 | 426.3 ± 20.8 | 68.1 ± 6.9 | 68.7 ± 1.3 |
| 15 | 105.0 ± 16.9 | 549.4 ± 29.3 | 178.7 ± 10.8 | 90.1 ± 3.0 |
aC Concentration determined by HPLC
All data are presented as mean ± SD. NF not found
Comparison of the kinetic parameters for caffeine degradation in different substrate concentrations (30 °C, 15 d, pH 7.0)a
| Substrate concentration (mg/L) | Fungal dry mass (g) | Ccaffeine,f (mg/L) | Qcaffeine | Qtheophylline | Ytheophylline/caffeine | % of caffeine degraded | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 600 | 0.22 ± 0.02A | 3.7 ± 0.8A | 262.6 ± 20.7A | 115.8 ± 10.1A | 39.8 ± 0.5A | 17.5 ± 1.4A | 0.44 ± 0.04A | 99.3 ± 0.1A |
| 1200 | 0.22 ± 0.03A | 105.0 ± 16.9B | 549.4 ± 29.3B | 178.7 ± 10.8B | 73.0 ± 1.1B | 36.6 ± 2.0B | 0.50 ± 0.03B | 91.3 ± 1.4B |
| 1800 | 0.23 ± 0.02A | 668.2 ± 37.3C | 643.8 ± 25.3C | 191.2 ± 4.5B | 75.5 ± 2.5B | 42.9 ± 1.7C | 0.57 ± 0.01C | 62.9 ± 2.1C |
aAll kinetic parameters were calculated according to Sirisansaneeyakul and others (2013) [34]
All data are presented as mean ± SD, A-Cp < 0.05 in the same column
Concentrations of caffeine, theophylline and 3-methylxanthine determined by HPLC
C the final caffeine concentration (mg/L), C the final theophylline concentration (mg/L), C the final 3-methylxanthine concentration (mg/L), Q the volumetric rate of caffeine degradation (mg/L d), Q the volumetric rate of theophylline production (mg/L d), Y theophyline yield on caffeine (mg/mg)
Comparison of the kinetic parameters for caffeine degradation on different reaction temperatures (1200 mg/L of caffeine,15d. pH 7.0)a
| Reaction temperature (°C) | Fungal dry mass (g) | Ccaffeine,f (mg/L) | Qcaffeine | Qtheophylline | Ytheophylline/caffeine | % of caffeine degraded | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 0.22 ± 0.02A | 121.6 ± 14.4A | 478.8 ± 20.2A | 196.6 ± 7.5A | 71.9 ± 1.0B | 31.9 ± 1.3A | 0.44 ± 0.02A | 89.9 ± 1.2B |
| 30 | 0.22 ± 0.03A | 105.0 ± 16.9A | 549.4 ± 29.3B | 178.7 ± 10.8B | 73.0 ± 1.1B | 36.6 ± 2.0B | 0.50 ± 0.03B | 90.5 ± 1.4B |
| 35 | 0.19 ± 0.02A | 202.0 ± 15.7B | 618.4 ± 18.8C | 149.8 ± 13.2B | 66.5 ± 1.0A | 421.2 ± 1.3C | 0.61 ± 0.02C | 83.2 ± 1.3A |
aAll kinetic parameters were calculated according to Sirisansaneeyakul and others (2013) [34]
All data are presented as mean ± SD, A-Cp < 0.05 in the same column
Concentrations of caffeine, theophylline and 3-methylxanthine determined by HPLC
Ccaffeine,f the final caffeine concentration (mg/L), Ctheophylline,f the final theophylline concentration (mg/L), C3-methylxanthine,f the final 3-methylxanthine concentration (mg/L), Qcaffeine the volumetric rate of caffeine degradation (mg/L d), Qtheophylline the volumetric rate of theophylline production (mg/L d), Ytheophylline/caffeine theophyline yield on caffeine (mg/mg)
Comparison of the kinetic parameters for caffeine degradation in different pH (1200 mg/L of caffeine, 30 °C,15d.)a
| pH | Fungal dry mass (g) | Ccaffeine,f (mg/L) | Qcaffeine | Qtheophylline | Ytheophylline/caffeine | % of caffeine degraded | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 0.14 ± 0.01A | 508.5 ± 45.4C | 245.3 ± 17.5A | 87.8 ± 12.5A | 46.1 ± 3.0A | 16.4 ± 1.2A | 0.35 ± 0.01A | 57.6 ± 3.8A |
| 6 | 0.22 ± 0.02B | 41.7 ± 5.9A | 776.5 ± 35.8C | 125.1 ± 10.9B | 77.2 ± 0.4C | 51.8 ± 2.4C | 0.67 ± 0.03C | 96.5 ± 0.5C |
| 7 | 0.22 ± 0.03B | 105.0 ± 16.9B | 549.4 ± 29.3B | 178.7 ± 10.8C | 73.0 ± 1.1B | 36.6 ± 2.0B | 0.50 ± 0.03B | 91.3 ± 1.4A |
aAll kinetic parameters were calculated according to Sirisansaneeyakul and others (2013) [34]
All data are presented as mean ± SD, A-Cp < 0.05 in the same column
Concentrations of caffeine, theophylline and 3-methylxanthine determined by HPLC
C the final caffeine concentration (mg/L), Ctheophylline,f the final theophylline concentration (mg/L), C3-methylxanthine,f the final 3-methylxanthine concentration (mg/L); Q the volumetric rate of caffeine degradation (mg/L d), Q the volumetric rate of theophylline production (mg/L d), Y theophyline yield on caffeine (mg/mg)
Fig. 3Changes in concentrations of caffeine (a) and theophylline (b) in shake flask fermentation with various pure culture. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Control was no inoculation treatment
Comparison of the kinetic parameters for caffeine degradation in tea infusion fermentation (30 °C, 15d, natural pH)a
| Strains or treatments | Fungal dry mass (g) | Ccaffeine,0 | Ccaffeine,f (mg/L) | Qcaffeine | Qtheophylline | Ytheophylline/caffeine | % of caffeine degraded | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.19 ± 0.02A | 1082.9 ± 65.8A | 157.8 ± 10.2A | 501.2 ± 13.5C | 61.7 ± 5.0B | 31.8 ± 0.8B | 0.52 ± 0.05B | 85.4 ± 1.7B | |
| 0.24 ± 0.01B | 1085.3 ± 64.8A | 1248.1 ± 30.5D | 27.2 ± 0.8A | ND | ND | ND | ND | |
| Natural treatment | 0.20 ± 0.02A | 1073.9 ± 78.6A | 817.6 ± 8.6B | 74.7 ± 3.3B | 17.1 ± 5.14A | 3.3 ± 0.1A | 0.21 ± 0.06A | 23.6 ± 5.3A |
| Control | ND | 1101.6 ± 89.5A | 1096.4 ± 33.2C | 25.0 ± 2.1A | ND | ND | ND | ND |
aAll kinetic parameters were calculated according to Sirisansaneeyakul and others (2013) [34]
All data are presented as mean ± SD, A-Dp < 0.05 in the same column
Concentrations of caffeine, theophylline and 3-methylxanthine determined by HPLC
C initial caffeine concentration (mg/L), C the final caffeine concentration (mg/L), Ctheophylline,f the final theophylline concentration (mg/L) Q the volumetric rate of caffeine degradation (mg/L d), Q the volumetric rate of theophylline production (mg/L d), Y theophyline yield on caffeine (mg/mg), ND not determined