Literature DB >> 35547346

Biomechanical Evaluation of Modified ACL Reconstruction with Over-the-Top Augmentation Technique.

Byoung-Hyun Min1, Hyung Keun Song1, Ki Hoon Park1, Tae Hun Kim1, Do Young Park1, Jun Young Chung1.   

Abstract

Background: Modified ACL reconstruction with over-the-top augmentation technique (OA-ACLR) was designed to allow one-stage revision regardless of tunnel conditions as well as to offer firm stability by hybrid double-fixation. Thus, the purpose of the study is to biomechanically evaluate its effect on knee stability by comparing it with single-bundle ACL reconstruction (SB-ACLR).
Methods: Ten porcine knees were sequentially tested using a custom testing system for intact ACL, ACL deficiency, SB-ACLR and OA-ACLR. First, 134-N anterior tibial load was applied, and anterior tibial translation was measured at 30°, 60°, and 90°. Then, anterior tibial translation and relative tibial rotation were measured in a combined rotatory load of 5-Nm of internal tibial torque and 10-Nm of valgus torque.
Results: Under anterior tibial load or combined anterior and rotatory loads, SB-ACLR and OA-ACLR resulted in no significant increase in anterior tibial translation at all flexion angles compared with an intact ACL group, and no significant difference was noted in anterior tibial translation between the two ACL reconstruction groups. In combined rotatory load, OA-ACLR resulted in enhanced rotational stability compared with SB-ACLR, and it more closely restored relative tibial internal rotation to the intact ACL group. Conclusions: Our study showed that modified ACL reconstruction with over-the-top augmentation technique resulted in enhanced rotational stability compared to the conventional single-bundle ACL reconstruction, especially at lower flexion angle in a porcine model. Therefore, with several potential advantages as well as biomechanical superiority, our new technique could be clinically applicable in primary and revision ACL reconstruction. Level of Evidence: Experimental. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; Anterior cruciate ligament; Knee; Over-the-top; Triple bundle

Year:  2022        PMID: 35547346      PMCID: PMC9043071          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00597-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.033


  36 in total

1.  Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison between 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock femoral tunnel placement. 2002 Richard O'Connor Award paper.

Authors:  John C Loh; Yukihisa Fukuda; Eiichi Tsuda; Richard J Steadman; Freddie H Fu; Savio L Y Woo
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Rotational changes at the knee after ACL injury cause cartilage thinning.

Authors:  Thomas P Andriacchi; Paul L Briant; Scott L Bevill; Seungbum Koo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Anatomical and nonanatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: importance of femoral tunnel location on knee kinematics.

Authors:  Thore Zantop; Nadine Diermann; Tobias Schumacher; Steffen Schanz; Freddie H Fu; Wolf Petersen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  A functional comparison of animal anterior cruciate ligament models to the human anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  J W Xerogeanes; R J Fox; Y Takeda; H S Kim; Y Ishibashi; G J Carlin; S L Woo
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 5.  The variable functional disability of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee.

Authors:  F R Noyes; G H McGinniss; E S Grood
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 6.  Extra-articular reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: lateral procedures.

Authors:  W G Carson
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 2.472

7.  Anatomic double-bundle and over-the-top single-bundle with additional extra-articular tenodesis: an in vivo quantitative assessment of knee laxity in two different ACL reconstructions.

Authors:  S Zaffagnini; C Signorelli; N Lopomo; T Bonanzinga; G M Marcheggiani Muccioli; S Bignozzi; A Visani; M Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Tibiofemoral kinematics following successful anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using dynamic multiple resonance imaging.

Authors:  Martin Charles Logan; Andrew Williams; Jonathon Lavelle; Wady Gedroyc; Michael Freeman
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  A Porcine Knee Model Is Valid for Use in the Evaluation of Arthroscopic Skills: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  R Kyle Martin; Danny Gillis; Jeff Leiter; Jesse Slade Shantz; Peter MacDonald
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  A comparison of dynamic rotational knee instability between anatomic single-bundle and over-the-top anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using triaxial accelerometry.

Authors:  Shigehiro Asai; Akira Maeyama; Yuichi Hoshino; Bunsei Goto; Umberto Celentano; Shigeaki Moriyama; Patrick Smolinski; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.