Literature DB >> 23568389

A comparison of dynamic rotational knee instability between anatomic single-bundle and over-the-top anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using triaxial accelerometry.

Shigehiro Asai1, Akira Maeyama, Yuichi Hoshino, Bunsei Goto, Umberto Celentano, Shigeaki Moriyama, Patrick Smolinski, Freddie H Fu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recently, single-bundle (SB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been advanced by the anatomic concept, but the biomechanical outcome of the anatomic method has not been fully investigated, especially for rotational instability. Anatomic SB and the single over-the-top procedures are the treatment of choice for primary cases and revision or skeletally immature cases, respectively. The purpose of this study was to investigate the dynamic rotational instability of anatomic SB and over-the-top reconstruction during a pivot shift test using triaxial accelerometry.
METHODS: Eight fresh frozen human cadaveric knees were used in this study. Rotational instability measurement was conducted during a pivot shift test by the use of a triaxial accelerometer attached to the tibia. The tests were performed in the ACL-intact, ACL-deficient and ACL-reconstructed knees with two different procedures (anatomic SB and over-the-top). The acceleration in three directions and the magnitude of acceleration were measured to evaluate rotational instability and compare between four different knee states.
RESULTS: The overall magnitude of acceleration was significantly different (P < 0.01) between the ACL-intact knees and the ACL-deficient knees. Both anatomic SB and over-the-top ACL reconstruction significantly reduced the overall magnitude of acceleration compared to the ACL-deficient knees, but still had larger accelerations compared to the ACL-intact knees. There was no significant difference for the overall magnitude of acceleration between anatomic SB and over-the-top reconstruction procedure.
CONCLUSION: Over-the-top reconstruction provides comparable result to anatomic SB reconstruction in terms of controlling the dynamic rotational stability. Over-the-top reconstruction might be one of the options for revision cases and in skeletally immature patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23568389     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2499-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  49 in total

1.  Incidence and mechanism of the pivot shift. An in vitro study.

Authors:  A M Bull; H N Andersen; O Basso; J Targett; A A Amis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Mininder S Kocher; J Richard Steadman; Karen K Briggs; William I Sterett; Richard J Hawkins
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004 Apr-May       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Quantitative assessment of pivot-shift using inertial sensors.

Authors:  Nicola Lopomo; Cecilia Signorelli; Tommaso Bonanzinga; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Andrea Visani; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Can the pivot-shift be eliminated by anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

Authors:  Stefano Zaffagnini; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Nicola Lopomo; Cecilia Signorelli; Tommaso Bonanzinga; Costanza Musiani; Papakonstantinou Vassilis; Marco Nitri; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  In vivo measurement of the pivot-shift test in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee using an electromagnetic device.

Authors:  Yuichi Hoshino; Ryosuke Kuroda; Kouki Nagamune; Masayoshi Yagi; Kiyonori Mizuno; Motoi Yamaguchi; Hirotsugu Muratsu; Shinichi Yoshiya; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Femoral tunnel placement during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo imaging analysis comparing transtibial and 2-incision tibial tunnel-independent techniques.

Authors:  Ermias S Abebe; C T Moorman; T Scott Dziedzic; Charles E Spritzer; R Lee Cothran; Dean C Taylor; William E Garrett; Louis E DeFrate
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  A biomechanical comparison of 2 femoral fixation techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients: over-the-top fixation versus transphyseal technique.

Authors:  Pisit Lertwanich; Yuki Kato; Cesar A Q Martins; Akira Maeyama; Sheila J M Ingham; Scott Kramer; Monica Linde-Rosen; Patrick Smolinski; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  The effect of oblique femoral tunnel placement on rotational constraint of the knee reconstructed using patellar tendon autografts.

Authors:  Jason M Scopp; Louis E Jasper; Stephen M Belkoff; Claude T Moorman
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Management and complications of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in skeletally immature patients: survey of the Herodicus Society and The ACL Study Group.

Authors:  Mininder S Kocher; Hillary S Saxon; W David Hovis; Richard J Hawkins
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

10.  Vertical femoral tunnel placement results in rotational knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Myung Chul Lee; Sang Cheol Seong; Sahnghoon Lee; Chong Bum Chang; Yoon Keun Park; Hyunchul Jo; Choong Hyun Kim
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  6 in total

1.  Quantitative comparison of the pivot shift test results before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by using the three-dimensional electromagnetic measurement system.

Authors:  Kanto Nagai; Yuichi Hoshino; Yuichiro Nishizawa; Daisuke Araki; Takehiko Matsushita; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Koji Takayama; Kouki Nagamune; Masahiro Kurosaka; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Modified ACL Reconstruction with Over-the-Top Augmentation Technique.

Authors:  Byoung-Hyun Min; Hyung Keun Song; Ki Hoon Park; Tae Hun Kim; Do Young Park; Jun Young Chung
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 1.033

3.  Evaluation of pivot shift phenomenon while awake and under anaesthesia by different manoeuvres using triaxial accelerometer.

Authors:  Kaori Nakamura; Hideyuki Koga; Ichiro Sekiya; Toshifumi Watanabe; Tomoyuki Mochizuki; Masafumi Horie; Tomomasa Nakamura; Koji Otabe; Takeshi Muneta
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-02       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Anterior cruciate ligament femoral-tunnel drilling through an anteromedial portal: 3-dimensional plane drilling angle affects tunnel length relative to notchplasty.

Authors:  Dong-Kyu Moon; Ho-Seung Jo; Dong-Yeong Lee; Dong-Geun Kang; Hee-Chan Won; Min-Seok Seo; Sun-Chul Hwang
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-04-14

5.  Equivalent outcomes of ACL revision with over-the-top single and double-bundle reconstruction using hamstring tendon compared to anatomical single and double-bundle reconstruction.

Authors:  Goki Kamei; Atsuo Nakamae; Masakazu Ishikawa; Kyohei Nakata; Akinori Nekomoto; Shunya Tsuji; Naofumi Hashiguchi; Nobuo Adachi
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-04-13

6.  Tibiofemoral joint contact area and stress after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with transtibial versus anteromedial portal drilling techniques.

Authors:  Chunhui Liu; Yingpeng Wang; Zhongli Li; Ji Li; Hao Zhang; Yangmu Fu; Kuan Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.359

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.