Reha N Tandogan1, Nanne P Kort2, Ersin Ercin3, Floris van Rooij4, Luca Nover5, Mo Saffarini5, Michael T Hirschmann6, Roland Becker7, David Dejour8. 1. Ortoklinik and Cankaya Orthopedics, Ankara, Turkey. 2. CortoClinics, Schijndel, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri University Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. 4. ReSurg SA, Rue Saint Jean 22, 1260, Nyon, Switzerland. Journals@resurg.com. 5. ReSurg SA, Rue Saint Jean 22, 1260, Nyon, Switzerland. 6. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kantonsspital Baselland (Bruderholz, Liestal, Laufen), Bruderholz, Switzerland. 7. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Centre of Joint Replacement, Hospital Brandenburg, Medical School "Theodor Fontane", Brandenburg/Havel, Germany. 8. Ramsay Santé, Lyon-Ortho-Clinic, Clinique de la Sauvegarde, Lyon, France.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine whether patient-specific instrumentation (PSI), computer-assisted surgery (CAS) or robot-assisted surgery (RAS) enable more accurate rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compared to conventional instrumentation, in terms of deviation from the planned target and the proportion of outliers from the target zone. METHODS: The authors independently conducted three structured electronic literature searches using the PubMed, Embase®, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from 2007 to 2020. Studies were included if they compared rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate during TKA using conventional instrumentation versus PSI, CAS, and/or RAS, and reported deviation from preoperatively planned rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate in terms of absolute angles and/or number of outliers. Methodological quality of eligible studies was assessed by two researchers according to the Downs and Black Quality Checklist for Health Care Intervention Studies. RESULTS: Fifteen studies, that reported on 2925 knees, were eligible for this systematic review, of which 6 studies used PSI, and 9 used CAS. No studies were found for RAS. Of the studies that reported on angular deviation from preoperatively planned rotational alignment, most found smaller deviations using PSI (0.5° to 1.4°) compared to conventional instrumentation (1.0° to 1.6°). All studies that reported on proportions of outliers from a target zone (± 3°), found lower rates of outliers using PSI (0 to 22%) compared to conventional instrumentation (5 to 96%). Most studies reported smaller angular deviation from preoperatively planned rotational alignment using CAS (0.1° to 6.9°) compared to conventional instrumentation (1.1° to 7.8°). Of the studies that reported on proportions of outliers from a target zone (± 3°), most found fewer outliers using CAS (10 to 61%) compared to conventional instrumentation (17 to 78%). CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that both CAS and PSI can improve the accuracy of rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate by decreasing angular deviation from the preoperatively planned target and reducing the proportion of outliers from the target zone. The clinical relevance is that PSI and CAS can improve alignment, though the thresholds necessary to grant better outcomes and survival remain unclear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
PURPOSE: To determine whether patient-specific instrumentation (PSI), computer-assisted surgery (CAS) or robot-assisted surgery (RAS) enable more accurate rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compared to conventional instrumentation, in terms of deviation from the planned target and the proportion of outliers from the target zone. METHODS: The authors independently conducted three structured electronic literature searches using the PubMed, Embase®, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from 2007 to 2020. Studies were included if they compared rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate during TKA using conventional instrumentation versus PSI, CAS, and/or RAS, and reported deviation from preoperatively planned rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate in terms of absolute angles and/or number of outliers. Methodological quality of eligible studies was assessed by two researchers according to the Downs and Black Quality Checklist for Health Care Intervention Studies. RESULTS: Fifteen studies, that reported on 2925 knees, were eligible for this systematic review, of which 6 studies used PSI, and 9 used CAS. No studies were found for RAS. Of the studies that reported on angular deviation from preoperatively planned rotational alignment, most found smaller deviations using PSI (0.5° to 1.4°) compared to conventional instrumentation (1.0° to 1.6°). All studies that reported on proportions of outliers from a target zone (± 3°), found lower rates of outliers using PSI (0 to 22%) compared to conventional instrumentation (5 to 96%). Most studies reported smaller angular deviation from preoperatively planned rotational alignment using CAS (0.1° to 6.9°) compared to conventional instrumentation (1.1° to 7.8°). Of the studies that reported on proportions of outliers from a target zone (± 3°), most found fewer outliers using CAS (10 to 61%) compared to conventional instrumentation (17 to 78%). CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that both CAS and PSI can improve the accuracy of rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate by decreasing angular deviation from the preoperatively planned target and reducing the proportion of outliers from the target zone. The clinical relevance is that PSI and CAS can improve alignment, though the thresholds necessary to grant better outcomes and survival remain unclear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Authors: Stuart W Bell; Peter Young; Colin Drury; Jules Smith; Iain Anthony; Bryn Jones; Mark Blyth; Angus McLean Journal: Knee Date: 2012-11-07 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Alex Gu; Amil Agarwal; Safa C Fassihi; Patawut Bovonratwet; Joshua C Campbell; Peter K Sculco Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2020-09-17 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Lucas Beckers; Jacobus H Müller; Jeremy Daxhelet; Salvatore Ratano; Mo Saffarini; Tarik Aït-Si-Selmi; Michel P Bonnin Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 4.342