Literature DB >> 35547179

Inter- and intra-scan variability for lung imaging quantifications via CT.

Sachin S Shankar1,2, Eric A Hoffman3,4, Jarron Atha3, Jessica C Sieren3,4, Ehsan Samei1,2, Ehsan Abadi1,2.   

Abstract

CT imaging provides physicians valuable insights when diagnosing disease in a clinical setting. In order to provide an accurate diagnosis, is it important to have a high accuracy with controlled variability across CT scans from different scanners and imaging parameters. The purpose of this study was to analyze variability of lung imaging biomarkers across various scanners and parameters using a customized version of a commercially available anthropomorphic chest Phantom (Kyoto Kagaku) with several experimental sample inserts. The phantom was across 10 different CT scanners with a total of 209 imaging conditions. An algorithm was developed to compute different imaging biomarkers. Variability across images from the same scanner and from different scanners was analyzed by computing coefficients of variation (CV) and standard deviations of HU values. LAA -950 and LAA -856 biomarkers had the highest levels of variability, while the majority of other biomarkers had variability less than 10 HU or 10% CV in both inter and intra-scan measurements. There was no clear trend present between the biomarker measurements and CTDIvol. The results of this study demonstrates the existing variability in CT quantifications for lung imaging, which prompt further studies on how to reduce such variation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; Imaging Variability; biomarker

Year:  2022        PMID: 35547179      PMCID: PMC9087481          DOI: 10.1117/12.2613191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  7 in total

1.  A low-cost density reference phantom for computed tomography.

Authors:  Zachary H Levine; Mingdong Li; Anthony P Reeves; David F Yankelevitz; Joseph J Chen; Eliot L Siegel; Adele Peskin; Diana N Zeiger
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Accuracy and reliability of measurements obtained from computed tomography 3D volume rendered images.

Authors:  Kyra E Stull; Meredith L Tise; Zabiullah Ali; David R Fowler
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Comparison of chest dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis imaging and dual-energy subtraction radiography to detect simulated pulmonary nodules with and without calcifications a phantom study.

Authors:  Tsutomu Gomi; Masahiro Nakajima; Hiroki Fujiwara; Tokuo Umeda
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Characterization of the relation between CT technical parameters and accuracy of quantification of lung attenuation on quantitative chest CT.

Authors:  Brian M Trotta; Alexander V Stolin; Mark B Williams; Spencer B Gay; Alan S Brody; Talissa A Altes
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Imaging Advances in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Insights from the Genetic Epidemiology of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPDGene) Study.

Authors:  Surya P Bhatt; George R Washko; Eric A Hoffman; John D Newell; Sandeep Bodduluri; Alejandro A Diaz; Craig J Galban; Edwin K Silverman; Raúl San José Estépar; David A Lynch
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  Sensitivity and accuracy of volumetry of pulmonary nodules on low-dose 16- and 64-row multi-detector CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study.

Authors:  Xueqian Xie; Yingru Zhao; Roland A Snijder; Peter M A van Ooijen; Pim A de Jong; Matthijs Oudkerk; Geertruida H de Bock; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Marcel J W Greuter
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  On the use of the coefficient of variation to quantify and compare trait variation.

Authors:  Christophe Pélabon; Christoffer H Hilde; Sigurd Einum; Marlène Gamelon
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2020-05-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.