Literature DB >> 35541026

Interpretation of cell mechanical experiments in microfluidic systems depend on the choice of cellular shape descriptors.

Bob Fregin, Doreen Biedenweg, Oliver Otto.   

Abstract

The capability to parameterize shapes is of essential importance in biomechanics to identify cells, to track their motion, and to quantify deformation. While various shape descriptors have already been investigated to study the morphology and migration of adherent cells, little is known of how the mathematical definition of a contour impacts the outcome of rheological experiments on cells in suspension. In microfluidic systems, hydrodynamic stress distributions induce time-dependent cell deformation that needs to be quantified to determine viscoelastic properties. Here, we compared nine different shape descriptors to characterize the deformation of suspended cells in an extensional as well as shear flow using dynamic real-time deformability cytometry. While stress relaxation depends on the amplitude and duration of stress, our results demonstrate that steady-state deformation can be predicted from single cell traces even for translocation times shorter than their characteristic time. Implementing an analytical simulation, performing experiments, and testing various data analysis strategies, we compared single cell and ensemble studies to address the question of computational costs vs experimental accuracy. Results indicate that high-throughput viscoelastic measurements of cells in suspension can be performed on an ensemble scale as long as the characteristic time matches the dimensions of the microfluidic system. Finally, we introduced a score to evaluate the shape descriptor-dependent effect size for cell deformation after cytoskeletal modifications. We provide evidence that single cell analysis in an extensional flow provides the highest sensitivity independent of shape parametrization, while inverse Haralick's circularity is mostly applicable to study cells in shear flow.
© 2022 Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35541026      PMCID: PMC9054269          DOI: 10.1063/5.0084673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomicrofluidics        ISSN: 1932-1058            Impact factor:   3.258


  31 in total

1.  Assessment of mechanical properties of adherent living cells by bead micromanipulation: comparison of magnetic twisting cytometry vs optical tweezers.

Authors:  Valérie M Laurent; Sylvie Hénon; Emmanuelle Planus; Redouane Fodil; Martial Balland; Daniel Isabey; François Gallet
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 2.  A mechanical biomarker of cell state in medicine.

Authors:  Dino Di Carlo
Journal:  J Lab Autom       Date:  2012-02

3.  Mechanism of shape determination in motile cells.

Authors:  Kinneret Keren; Zachary Pincus; Greg M Allen; Erin L Barnhart; Gerard Marriott; Alex Mogilner; Julie A Theriot
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Stress relaxation microscopy: imaging local stress in cells.

Authors:  Susana Moreno-Flores; Rafael Benitez; Maria Dm Vivanco; José Luis Toca-Herrera
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Real-time deformability cytometry: on-the-fly cell mechanical phenotyping.

Authors:  Oliver Otto; Philipp Rosendahl; Alexander Mietke; Stefan Golfier; Christoph Herold; Daniel Klaue; Salvatore Girardo; Stefano Pagliara; Andrew Ekpenyong; Angela Jacobi; Manja Wobus; Nicole Töpfner; Ulrich F Keyser; Jörg Mansfeld; Elisabeth Fischer-Friedrich; Jochen Guck
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  High-Throughput Microfluidic Characterization of Erythrocyte Shapes and Mechanical Variability.

Authors:  Felix Reichel; Johannes Mauer; Ahmad Ahsan Nawaz; Gerhard Gompper; Jochen Guck; Dmitry A Fedosov
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Numerical Simulation of Real-Time Deformability Cytometry To Extract Cell Mechanical Properties.

Authors:  M Mokbel; D Mokbel; A Mietke; N Träber; S Girardo; O Otto; J Guck; S Aland
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2017-01-30

8.  Label-free on chip quality assessment of cellular blood products using real-time deformability cytometry.

Authors:  Konstanze Aurich; Bob Fregin; Raghavendra Palankar; Jan Wesche; Oliver Hartwich; Doreen Biedenweg; Thi-Huong Nguyen; Andreas Greinacher; Oliver Otto
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 6.799

9.  Real-time fluorescence and deformability cytometry.

Authors:  Philipp Rosendahl; Katarzyna Plak; Angela Jacobi; Martin Kraeter; Nicole Toepfner; Oliver Otto; Christoph Herold; Maria Winzi; Maik Herbig; Yan Ge; Salvatore Girardo; Katrin Wagner; Buzz Baum; Jochen Guck
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 10.  Optical coherence elastography in ophthalmology.

Authors:  Mitchell A Kirby; Ivan Pelivanov; Shaozhen Song; Łukasz Ambrozinski; Soon Joon Yoon; Liang Gao; David Li; Tueng T Shen; Ruikang K Wang; Matthew O'Donnell
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.170

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.