Literature DB >> 21777999

The influence of energy storage and return foot stiffness on walking mechanics and muscle activity in below-knee amputees.

Nicholas P Fey1, Glenn K Klute, Richard R Neptune.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Below-knee amputees commonly experience asymmetrical gait patterns and develop comorbidities in their intact and residual legs. Carbon fiber prosthetic feet have been developed to minimize these asymmetries by utilizing elastic energy storage and return to provide body support, forward propulsion and leg swing initiation. However, how prosthetic foot stiffness influences walking characteristics is not well-understood. The purpose of this study was to identify the influence of foot stiffness on kinematics, kinetics, muscle activity, prosthetic energy storage and return, and mechanical efficiency during amputee walking.
METHODS: A comprehensive biomechanical analysis was performed on 12 unilateral below-knee amputees. Subjects walked overground at 1.2 m/s with three prosthetic feet of varying keel and heel stiffness levels, which were created using additive manufacturing.
FINDINGS: As stiffness decreased, peak residual and intact leg ankle angles and residual leg knee flexion angle increased. The residual and intact leg braking ground reaction forces and knee extensor moments, residual leg vastus and gluteus medius activity, and intact leg vastus and rectus femoris activity also increased. The second vertical ground reaction force peak and hamstring activity in the residual leg and first vertical ground reaction force peak in the intact leg decreased. In addition, prosthetic energy storage and return increased and mechanical efficiency decreased as stiffness decreased.
INTERPRETATION: Decreasing foot stiffness can increase prosthesis range of motion, mid-stance energy storage and late-stance energy return, but the net contributions to forward propulsion and swing initiation may be limited as additional muscle activity to provide body support becomes necessary.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21777999     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  29 in total

1.  Sensitivity of biomechanical outcomes to independent variations of hindfoot and forefoot stiffness in foot prostheses.

Authors:  Peter Gabriel Adamczyk; Michelle Roland; Michael E Hahn
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.161

2.  Optimization of prosthetic foot stiffness to reduce metabolic cost and intact knee loading during below-knee amputee walking: a theoretical study.

Authors:  Nicholas P Fey; Glenn K Klute; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Effect of alignment changes on socket reaction moments while walking in transtibial prostheses with energy storage and return feet.

Authors:  Toshiki Kobayashi; Adam K Arabian; Michael S Orendurff; Teri G Rosenbaum-Chou; David A Boone
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Two biomechanical strategies for locomotor adaptation to split-belt treadmill walking in subjects with and without transtibial amputation.

Authors:  Brian P Selgrade; Megan E Toney; Young-Hui Chang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-01-14       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Energetic consequences of using a prosthesis with adaptive ankle motion during slope walking in persons with a transtibial amputation.

Authors:  Benjamin J Darter; Jason M Wilken
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Shock absorption during transtibial amputee gait: Does longitudinal prosthetic stiffness play a role?

Authors:  Erin Boutwell; Rebecca Stine; Steven Gard
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Kinetics of individual limbs during level and slope walking with a unilateral transtibial bone-anchored prosthesis in the cat.

Authors:  Joshua R Jarrell; Brad J Farrell; Robert S Kistenberg; John F Dalton; Mark Pitkin; Boris I Prilutsky
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Design and Validation of a Semi-Active Variable Stiffness Foot Prosthesis.

Authors:  Evan M Glanzer; Peter G Adamczyk
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  Considering passive mechanical properties and patient user motor performance in lower limb prosthesis design optimization to enhance rehabilitation outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew J Major; Nicholas P Fey
Journal:  Phys Ther Rev       Date:  2017-07-17

10.  Focusing research efforts on the unique needs of women prosthesis users.

Authors:  Matthew J Major; Andrew H Hansen; Elizabeth Russell Esposito
Journal:  J Prosthet Orthot       Date:  2021-01-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.