Wylie Burke1, Shelly R Hovick2, Elizabeth Jordan3,4, Hanyu Ni3,4, Daniel D Kinnamon3,4, Ray E Hershberger3,4,5. 1. Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle (W.B.). 2. School of Communication, Ohio State University, Columbus (S.R.H.). 3. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Human Genetics (E.J., H.N., D.D.K., R.E.H.), Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus. 4. Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute (E.J., H.N., D.D.K., R.E.H.), Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus. 5. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.E.H.), Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Assuring that relatives are informed about a genetic diagnosis and have appropriate medical follow-up can be challenging. We hypothesize that communal coping (CC)-an approach in which a group views a stressor (such as a new genetic diagnosis) as our problem, versus my or your problem, and takes joint action to address it-can help families to address this challenge. A better understanding of CC could also inform counseling interventions to promote CC and family follow-up. METHODS: In the Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM) PM study (Precision Medicine), living first-degree relatives of DCM probands were invited to undergo clinical screening; 31% of these did so. This research program offers the opportunity to determine the frequency of CC in DCM families, assess whether CC attitudes and actions occurred more commonly among families in which family members participated, and conduct prospective follow-up to evaluate family coping and counseling needs over time. RESULTS: The proposed studies will provide evidence about the frequency of CC attitudes and actions among DCM families, assess the association of CC with increased family follow-up, and identify counseling needs related to family follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The DCM PM study offers an opportunity to test the hypothesis that CC contributes to increased family follow-up and generate evidence to inform counseling interventions to encourage such follow-up.
BACKGROUND: Assuring that relatives are informed about a genetic diagnosis and have appropriate medical follow-up can be challenging. We hypothesize that communal coping (CC)-an approach in which a group views a stressor (such as a new genetic diagnosis) as our problem, versus my or your problem, and takes joint action to address it-can help families to address this challenge. A better understanding of CC could also inform counseling interventions to promote CC and family follow-up. METHODS: In the Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM) PM study (Precision Medicine), living first-degree relatives of DCM probands were invited to undergo clinical screening; 31% of these did so. This research program offers the opportunity to determine the frequency of CC in DCM families, assess whether CC attitudes and actions occurred more commonly among families in which family members participated, and conduct prospective follow-up to evaluate family coping and counseling needs over time. RESULTS: The proposed studies will provide evidence about the frequency of CC attitudes and actions among DCM families, assess the association of CC with increased family follow-up, and identify counseling needs related to family follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The DCM PM study offers an opportunity to test the hypothesis that CC contributes to increased family follow-up and generate evidence to inform counseling interventions to encourage such follow-up.
Authors: Megan A Lewis; Colleen M McBride; Kathryn I Pollak; Elaine Puleo; Rita M Butterfield; Karen M Emmons Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2005-09-16 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Jan Hodgson; Sylvia Metcalfe; Clara Gaff; Susan Donath; Martin B Delatycki; Ingrid Winship; Loane Skene; MaryAnne Aitken; Jane Halliday Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2015-07-01 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Ray E Hershberger; Michael M Givertz; Carolyn Y Ho; Daniel P Judge; Paul F Kantor; Kim L McBride; Ana Morales; Matthew R G Taylor; Matteo Vatta; Stephanie M Ware Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2018-03-19 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Laura M Koehly; June A Peters; Regina Kenen; Lindsey M Hoskins; Anne L Ersig; Natalia R Kuhn; Jennifer T Loud; Mark H Greene Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2009-10-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Laura M Koehly; June A Peters; Natalia Kuhn; Lindsey Hoskins; Anne Letocha; Regina Kenen; Jennifer Loud; Mark H Greene Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Gordon S Huggins; Daniel D Kinnamon; Garrie J Haas; Elizabeth Jordan; Mark Hofmeyer; Evan Kransdorf; Gregory A Ewald; Alanna A Morris; Anjali Owens; Brian Lowes; Douglas Stoller; W H Wilson Tang; Sonia Garg; Barry H Trachtenberg; Palak Shah; Salpy V Pamboukian; Nancy K Sweitzer; Matthew T Wheeler; Jane E Wilcox; Stuart Katz; Stephen Pan; Javier Jimenez; Keith D Aaronson; Daniel P Fishbein; Frank Smart; Jessica Wang; Stephen S Gottlieb; Daniel P Judge; Charles K Moore; Jonathan O Mead; Hanyu Ni; Wylie Burke; Ray E Hershberger Journal: JAMA Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 157.335
Authors: Elizabeth Jordan; Laiken Peterson; Tomohiko Ai; Babken Asatryan; Lucas Bronicki; Emily Brown; Rudy Celeghin; Matthew Edwards; Judy Fan; Jodie Ingles; Cynthia A James; Olga Jarinova; Renee Johnson; Daniel P Judge; Najim Lahrouchi; Ronald H Lekanne Deprez; R Thomas Lumbers; Francesco Mazzarotto; Argelia Medeiros Domingo; Rebecca L Miller; Ana Morales; Brittney Murray; Stacey Peters; Kalliopi Pilichou; Alexandros Protonotarios; Christopher Semsarian; Palak Shah; Petros Syrris; Courtney Thaxton; J Peter van Tintelen; Roddy Walsh; Jessica Wang; James Ware; Ray E Hershberger Journal: Circulation Date: 2021-05-05 Impact factor: 29.690