Literature DB >> 35535268

The Socioeconomic Impact of Cervical Cancer on Patients in Ethiopia: Evidence from Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital.

Helen Endale1, Tefera Mulugeta1, Teshome Habte1.   

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer is very common among women living in low-resource environments, according to the literature. About 85% of the cases and 88% of the deaths due to cervical cancer occurred in developing countries. Women in low- and middle-income countries have a 35% higher average life risk of cervical cancer than women in high-income countries. However, research on the socioeconomic impact of cervical cancer on patients is virtually absent in the country. Objective: To assess the socioeconomic impact of cervical cancer on patients at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia in 2021.
Methods: Institutional based cross-sectional study design was employed. A structured and semi-structured questionnaire was used. The participants were selected using a simple random sampling technique. The collected data was entered and analyzed using the SPSS version 24 statistical software package.
Results: Out of 423 sampled respondents, 416 agreed to participate in the study and the response rate was 98%. The study revealed that cervical cancer has a social impact on patients in terms of social discrimination 61.8%, loss of body image 63%, loss of sexual functioning 78%, and loss of femininity 89%. It has also an economic impact in terms of loss of income of 45.7%, financial distress due to medical and nonmedical expenditures 71%, work and employment challenges 66.8%. Conclusion and Recommendation: Cervical cancer has an enormous socioeconomic impact on patients in terms of social discrimination, loss of body image, loss of sexual functioning, loss of femininity, loss of income, financial distress, work and employment challenges. Hence, efforts on reduction of social discrimination, psychotherapy support, and financial support are needed to limit the socioeconomic impact of cervical cancer on patients.
© 2022 Endale et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervical cancer; economic impact; social impact

Year:  2022        PMID: 35535268      PMCID: PMC9078746          DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S352389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Manag Res        ISSN: 1179-1322            Impact factor:   3.602


Background

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer among women globally, with an estimated 604,000 new cases and 342,000 deaths in 2020. About 90% of the new cases and deaths worldwide in 2020 occurred in low- and middle-income countries.1 In Ethiopia, cervical cancer is the second most common cancer (13.6%) next to breast cancer (32.9%). The annual incidence of cervical cancer is around 6294 new cases and the annual mortality is over 4884. Therefore, given the high incidence, the disease has become a serious health concern in the country.2 Following the increase of prevalence and death caused by cervical cancer, patients have to deal with increased treatment-related expenses, loss of employment and consequent income, and changes in household responsibilities. Moreover, cervical cancer disproportionately affects women in the low socioeconomic level, and thus the disease can have dramatic consequences for the living conditions of patients, including falling into poverty or being pushed into deeper poverty.3 Cervical cancer is preventable primarily through prophylactic HPV vaccination and screening for precancerous lesions are in some instance currently practicing, but still it is a public health concern due to scarcity of resource and not widely implementing it for all women of child bearing age.1,3 Cervical cancer affects women in the time that they are critical to economic and social stability. It enforces them to reduce their work productivity while theyincur overwhelming medical costs. It also left women burdened by infertility, negative body image, and feeling flawed as a woman, and sexually undesirable. Moreover, in Ethiopia around 80% of cancer cases are already diagnosed when the case becomes worse, which make the treatment more costly and less successful, which aggravates cervical cancer to an enormous socioeconomic burden on patients.4 The economic impact of cervical cancer in the developing countries like Ethiopia highly affects the quality of life, due to medical and nonmedical costs incurred upon the individual over the course of the disease. Medical costs mainly include cost of medicine, laboratory test, and hospital admission charges. While the nonmedical costs are related with cost of travel, accommodation and other out of pocket expenses over the course of treatment.5 In addition, it has also an economic impact in terms of reduction of work hours, work interruption, work stop, loss of income, sale of property, and use of past savings.6 Furthermore, the financial impact of cervical cancer is much worse for patients in a developing country than the developed one as there is no well-established insurance system in these countries.7 Alternatively, cervical cancer has also an adverse social impact on patients. In this regard, prolonged cancer hospitalization usually alienates cancer patients from their social relationships.8 Moreover, its treatment affects a patient’s body image and sexual functioning, which negatively affects their intimate relationship and quality of sex life. Cervical cancer patients also experienced social discrimination as it is often associated a shameful disease from evil spirit and contagious. It is also a cause for loss of fertility which is particularly distressing for the women and affects their marriage and intimate relationship.9 Therefore, given the fact that cervical cancer has become a serious health problem in Ethiopia, it is expected that it has an enormous socioeconomic impact on patients. However, research conducted in Ethiopia on cervical cancer has not addressed this issue of interest, rather they focus mainly on the issue related with prevention, screening, awareness, knowledge, and attitude. Hence, to the best of the researchers' knowledge, no other study is conducted on the socioeconomic impact of cervical cancer on patients in Ethiopia so far. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess the socio-economic impact of cervical cancer on patients at Tikur Anbessa specialized hospital.

Methods

Study Design

Institution based cross-sectional study design was employed and the data were collected during the period from March 1–30, 2021 G.C.

Study Setting

The study was carried out in Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH) which is located in the capital city of Ethiopia. It provides a tertiary level referral treatment and it is the largest central referral hospital that has an oncology ward. It is also the only institute that provides radiotherapy treatments for cancer patients in Ethiopia.

Sample Size Determination and Sampling Procedure

The sample size for this study has been determined using a single population proportion formula. Hence, the final sample size obtained including 10% nonresponse rate was 423.

Eligibility Criteria

All women attended cervical cancer screening and whose had at least two or more follow-ups were included in the study and those patients critically sick and unable to communicate to provide information during the data collection period were excluded from the study.

Study Instrument

Data was collected from cervical cancer patients who attend the oncology unit of TASH using structured and semi-structured questionnaires which were translated into Amharic from its English version. The instrument consists of two parts which were sociodemographic variables and socioeconomic variables that show the impact of cervical cancer on patients.3,4,6,9 The questionnaires were translated from English to Amharic and back translated to English to conform the accuracy of the Amharic version before using for data collection.

Operational Definition

Social impact: was defined or measured in terms of social discrimination, loss of body image, loss of sexual functioning and loss of femininity, as reported by the patients (self-report). Hence, patients were asked to reply a fixed choice answer of “Yes” or” No” on each social impact indicator variables. Economic impact: was defined or measured in terms of loss of income, financial challenge, work and employment challenge, as perceived by the patients (self-report). Hence, patients were asked to reply a fixed choice answer of “Yes” or” No” on each economic impact indicator variables.5,6,9

Data Analysis

The collected data was verified to ensure completeness and then coded, entered in an Excel (Microsoft Corporation) spread sheet. The data was analyzed with the help of SPSS version 24 statistical software package. Descriptive statistics such as frequency, percentages and mean were used to describe the result of the study. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression was done to evaluate the association between independent versus outcome variable. In bivariate analysis, variables that have a P-value of less than 0.25 was included in multivariable analysis where variables that have P-value of less than 0.05 was used to determine level of statistical significance.

Data Quality Assurance

To ensure the validity and reliability of the data collection tool, pretest was done on 5% of the total sample size calculated two weeks before the actual data collection period held at Saint Paul's Referral Hospital and the questionnaire had been checked for its clarity, understand ability and simplicity. Respondents who were involved during the pretest were not included in the main study. After pretest, the questionnaires were reviewed and reformatted based on the obtained inputs and comments. The completed questionnaire was presented to the principal investigator and checked for its completeness and comprehensiveness to assure the quality of data. The principal investigator had been responsible for supportive supervision on the spot and on reviewing all completed questionnaires on a daily basis. Moreover, training was also given to data collectors to assure the quality of data.

Results

The Sociodemographic Characteristics

A total of 423 questionnaires were distributed among the study participants and 416 responded with response rate of 98%. Majority of the respondents (55.1%) were belonging to the age group of 30–50 years and most of the respondents (40.8%) were orthodox Christian. Regarding educational status, 32% of the women cannot read and write, whereas 26% had completed elementary school, and 23% had completed high school. As shown in Table 1, the majority of the respondents belong to urban areas (63%) and 47.1% were married. Most of the patients (64.7%) were found with late stage of the disease and about 50% of the respondents were employed. The treatment modality of the patients indicated that 31% of the respondents did not start cervical cancer treatment while 69% of the respondent took different types of treatments.
Table 1

Sociodemographic Characteristics of Cervical Cancer Patients at TASH, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, March 2021 (n=416)

VariablesFrequencyPercentage
Age
 30–397919.0
 40–4915036.1
 50–5910024.0
 >608720.9
Religion
 Orthodox Christian17040.8
 Muslim13332.0
 Protestant6716.1
 Other4611.1
Marital status
 Single5813.9
 Married19647.1
 Widowed5413.0
 Divorced/separated10826.0
Level of education
 Cannot read and write13332.0
 Elementary completed10826.0
 High school completed9623.0
 College and above7919.0
Area of residence
 Urban26263.0
 Rural15437.0
Occupational status

Employed

Public

Private

9211622.127.9
 Self-employed378.9
 Unemployed17141.1
Level of sickness stage
 Early stage15136.3
 Late stage26563.7
Treatment of modality
 Not start treatment13031
 Radiotherapy8019
 Chemotherapy10024
 Both radiotherapy and chemotherapy6115
 All chemotherapy, radiotherapy, brachytherapy4511
Sociodemographic Characteristics of Cervical Cancer Patients at TASH, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, March 2021 (n=416) Employed Public Private

Social Impact of Cervical Cancer

Social Discrimination

Majority of the respondents 256 (61.5%) revealed that they had experienced social discrimination as a result of cervical cancer while the rest 160 (38.5%) did not face social discrimination. Regarding the source of social discrimination, it mainly comes from their neighbor 167 (65%) and followed by community 146 (56.8%), close friends 131 (51%) and husband/partner 64 (24.9%). In addition to social discrimination, the result of the study also revealed that 279 (67%) of cervical cancer patient had made self-stigmatization due to bad smell of vaginal discharge 193 (69.2%) followed by cervical cancer made them feel alone 151 (54.1%), rejection by family, spouse and neighbors 131 (47%), think people do not understand them 98 (35.1%) and prolonged cancer hospitalization 70 (25.1%).

Loss of Sexual Functioning

Of the 416 respondents, 324 (78%) of the respondent mentioned that cervical cancer has a negative impact on their sexual functioning and intimate relationship while the rest 92 (22%) had not noticed its impact. This is due to, loss sexual desire 224 (69%), loss of physical strength 139 (43%), fear of sex worsened the condition 175 (54.1%), fear of pain during intercourse 230 (70.9%), loss of wholeness 214 (66.1%), loss of potential marriage opportunity 143 (44%), fear and doubt to start new relationship 126 (38.9%), make them not have sexual partner 123 (38%).

Loss of Body Image

About 262 (63%) of cervical cancer patients stated that cervical cancer treatment negatively affected their body image in terms of hair loss 220 (83.9%), feel disfigured 192 (73.1%), cannot regain the physical strength that they once had 118 (45%), decrease the attractiveness of their body 183 (70%), feeling old 131 (50%). Moreover, it also make to worry or lose confidence about their body 102 (38.9%) which in turn enforced them to use artificial hair and wear clothing to cover their body 154 (58.9%).

Loss of Femininity

Among 212 respondents who had faced infertility problems, many of them 189 (89%) reported that they lost their femininity or womanhood due to infertility. In this regard, the majority of the respondents 161 (85%) thought that fertility is a key element that made them a woman and 113 (60%) of the respondents was also thought that the culture of their society shall attest femininity via fertility.

Economic Impact of Cervical Cancer

Financial Challenge

As depicted in Figure 1, the majority of the patients (295, 71%) had faced extensive financial distress due medical and nonmedical expenditures of cervical cancer treatments while the rest (121, 29%) of the respondents reported that their expenditure is the same prior to the onset of the illness. Due to the increment of medical and nonmedical cost of cervical cancer, it forced patients to borrow money (75%), sell an asset (59.9%), use past saving (32%) and mortgage asset (35.1%). It was also quite heartening to note that only 5% of the respondents got support from an NGO.
Figure 1

Source of financing for medical and nonmedical expenditures of cervical cancer patients at TASH, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, March 2021.

Source of financing for medical and nonmedical expenditures of cervical cancer patients at TASH, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, March 2021.

Work and Employment Challenge

Among the total of 208 employed cervical cancer patients who worked in public and private sectors, 66.8% of them reported that cervical cancer had affected their work and employment status. This is due to the illness make to reduce work hours (53%) and stop work (41%). Moreover, due to cervical cancer illness, 27.8% of the respondent had been forced to change their job on average once in six months.

Loss of Income

About 112 (45.7%) of the total employed respondents lost their monthly income while the rest 133 (54.3%) of the respondent did not lose their income. Regarding the amount of monthly income loss by the respondents, it was reported that the average monthly loss is Ethiopian birr (ETB) 2100 while in some case it varies with average of ETB1200 to ETB14,000.

Factors Associated with Socioeconomic Impact of Cervical Cancer

Cervical cancer patients who lived in a rural area had encountered higher social discrimination (1.9 times) compared to a study done with patients living in an urban area. In addition, women with cervical cancer who were unemployed had encountered higher social discrimination (1.2 times) compared to patients who were unemployed. And also, cervical cancer patients who were at late stage of the disease had encountered higher social discrimination, higher loss of sexual functioning, higher loss of body image, higher loss of femininity compared to patients at early stage of the disease as shown in Table 2. Further, patients who took any cervical cancer treatment had encountered higher social discrimination, loss of sexual functioning, loss of body image, loss of femininity compared to patients who did not start the treatment.
Table 2

Results of Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis for the Outcome Variable “Social Impact Indicators” of Cervical Cancer at TASH, 2021

VariablesSocial DiscriminationAOR (95%CI)Loss of Sexual FunctioningAOR (95%CI)Loss of Body ImageAOR (95%CI)Loss of FemininityAOR (95%CI)
YesNoYesNoYesNoYesNo
Area of residence
 Urban15011211956711401221911711
 Rural106481.923 (1.296–3.600)*129250.557 (0.022–2.466)122321.055 (0.062–2.107)98560.771 (0.114–1.955)
Occupational status
 Employed8715811806511291161871581
 Unemployed16921.261 (1.021–2.671)**144270.943 (0.277–2.855)133380.654 (0.113–1.996)102690.006 (0.001–1.942)
Sickness stage
 Early stage92591945716883162891
 Late stage1641012.809 (1.454–4.332)*230353.443 (1.557–4.069)*194711.812 (1.211–2.444)*1271381.452 (1.252–2.500)**
Treatment modality
 Not start treatment7456178521129101181221
 Radiotherapy52282.440 (1.457–4.721)**70102.333 (1.943–3.204)*63173.210 (2.001–4.644)*54260.943 (0.243–2.949)
 Chemotherapy59411.664 (1.212–2.555)*89111.623 (1.213–2.674)*81191.421 (1.251–2.054)*62381.230 (1.001–3.021)**
 Chemotherapy and radiotherapy41202.011 (1.891–4.005)*5292.000 (1.754–2.910)*5382.572 (1.700–4.000)*38231.632 (1.300–2.696)*
 Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and  brachytherapy30153.281 (1.743–4.944)**35101.994 (1.219–2.888)*3692.444 (1.496–3.011)**27182.111 (1.621–4.400)*

Notes: *P-value is significant at 0.05, **-value significant at 0.01.

Results of Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis for the Outcome Variable “Social Impact Indicators” of Cervical Cancer at TASH, 2021 Notes: *P-value is significant at 0.05, **-value significant at 0.01. From an economic impact point of view, as shown in Table 3, cervical cancer patients who lived in a rural area had faced higher financial challenges (2.5 times) and higher loss of income (1.3 times) compared to patients who live in an urban area. Compared to patients at early stage of the disease, patients at late stage of the disease had encountered higher financial challenges (1.6 times more). And also, patients at late stage of the disease had encountered higher loss of income compared to patients at early stage. Cervical cancer patients who lived in a rural area had encountered less work and employment challenges (0.6 times less) as compared to patients who lived in an urban area. Moreover, cervical cancer patients who were at late stage of the disease had encountered higher work and employment challenges (3.6 times) compared to patients at early stage of the disease. Furthermore, those patients who start any type of treatment had encountered higher financial challenges, loss of income, work and employment challenges compared to patients at who did not start the treatment.
Table 3

Results of Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis for the Outcome Variable “Economic Impact Indicator” of Cervical Cancer at TASH, 2021

 VariablesLoss of IncomeAOR (95%CI)Financial ChallengeAOR (95%CI)Challenge on Work and EmploymentAOR (95%CI)
YesNoYesNoYesNo
Area of residence
 Urban7452119567192281
 Rural38811.300 (1.212–2.012)**100542.521 (1.790–3.250)*47410.602 (0.024–0.986)**
Sickness stage
 Early stage2910219457152451
 Late stage83313.424 (2.001–4.124)*201641.660 (1.222–3.000)*87243.621 (2.001–4.828)**
Treatment modality
 Not start treatment128414486114351
 Radiotherapy26142.961 (1.484–3.021)**7281.288 (1.001–3.500)*35101.800 (1.019–2.660)*
 Chemotherapy31123.011 (1.459–4.550)*88122.100 (1.028–2.888)**36112.117 (1.006–2.442)*
 Chemotherapy and  radiotherapy24121.444 (1.002–2.000)*5561.766 (1.599–3.600)*2993.081 (1.778–3.900)**
 Chemotherapy, radiotherapy,  and brachytherapy19112.841 (1.434–3.077)*3691.550 (1.006–2.701)**2542.669 (1.944–3.028)*

Notes: *P-value is significant at 0.05, **P-value significant at 0.01.

Results of Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis for the Outcome Variable “Economic Impact Indicator” of Cervical Cancer at TASH, 2021 Notes: *P-value is significant at 0.05, **P-value significant at 0.01.

Discussion

This study assessed the socioeconomic impact of cervical cancer on patients in Ethiopia. In line with this, the social impact was analyzed based on social impact indicator variables. Accordingly, the study revealed that 61.8% of the patients had faced social discrimination which is mainly from their neighbor (65%), community (56.8%), close friends (51%) and husband (24.9%). This finding is consistent with the earlier study conducted in Brazil where 53.2% of cervical cancer patients had faced social discrimination mainly by their neighbor (39%) and friends (30%) which is slightly less than the current study finding.9 This could be attributed the fact that the awareness and level of education about cervical cancer was by far better in Brazil than in Ethiopia. This study showed that cervical cancer has a negative impact on sexual functioning of patient as reported by 78% of the respondents, which is mainly through loss of sexual desire (69%), loss of physical strength (43%), fear of relapsing (54.1%), fear of pain during intercourse (70.9%) and loss of wholeness (66.1%). This result is consistent with the studies conducted in Ireland,10 Japan,11 and USA12 where cervical cancer negatively affect the sexual functioning of 63%, 53%, and 69% of the patients, respectively. A study conducted in Croatia also found similar results to this study.13 This study revealed that cervical cancer has a negative impact on body image of patients as reported by 63% of the respondents. This study finding is lower to that reported by Irene et al (67%) in Singapore14 and Izycki et al (59%) in Poland15 but higher than that reported by Khalil et al (35%) in Morocco.6 Moreover, this study also indicated that the negative impact of cervical cancer on body image took place through hair loss (83.9%), feeling disfigured (73.1%), loss of physical strength (45%), decrease the attractiveness of the body (70%) and feeling old (50%). In present study 51% of the patients had faced the problem of infertility due to cervical cancer treatment, which also makes 89% of them lose their femininity or womanhood. This is congruent with the studies conducted in Iran16 and Germany17 where 37% and 45% of the patients had faced loss of femininity, respectively. It is also consistent with the study conducted in USA where 70% of the patients reported that they faced loss of femininity due to cervical cancer treatment.18 Regarding the economic impact of cervical cancer on patients, it was also analyzed based on different economic impact indicator variables. Accordingly, this study found that the majority of the patients (71%) had faced extensive financial distress due medical and nonmedical expenditures of cervical cancer treatments. This finding is consistent with the study conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa where 64% of the patients had faced financial challenges due to cervical cancer.19 Previous studies in Kenya,20 and China21 correspond with this study. The study revealed that cervical cancer patients were not in a position to finance their medical and nonmedical expenditure which forced them to borrow money (75%), sell an asset (59.9%), use past saving (32%), mortgage an asset (35.1%), get support from an NGO (5%). This finding is congruent with the study conducted in China where patients were forced to sell their assets (27%), take loans (22%), use past savings (34%) due to cervical cancer21 Moreover, a study conducted in Kenya had the same result with this study where patients were forced to use past savings (23.8%), borrowing (22.4%), and sell assets (15%).8 In the present study 66.8% of the employed patients had faced work and employment challenges due to cervical cancer. In this regard, the illness forced 53% of the patients to reduce work hours and 41% of the patients to stop work. This is congruent with the study conducted in Brazil where 15.38% of cervical cancer patients had quit their job due to cervical cancer.9 It is also consistent with the studies conducted in USA22 and South Africa23 where 59% and 60% of cervical cancer patients abandoned their work due to cervical cancer. In the present study cervical cancer patients who lived in a rural area had encountered higher social discrimination, financial challenge and loss of income compared to patients who lived in an urban area. This might be due to the fact that there is low awareness in rural communities about the disease and they even consider the disease as an evil spirit or a result of curse of God. Alternatively, the rural community mainly focus on agricultural activity and their economic diversification is limited, which makes their source of income inadequate. Moreover, the nonmedical cost for rural patients is likely higher as they travel longer distances in search of medical service than the urban patient. This study also revealed that cervical cancer patients who were at late stage of the disease had encountered higher social discrimination, financial challenge, loss of income, work and employment challenges compared to patients who were at an early stage of the disease. Probable reasons could be that patients at late stage could not play a significant role in society and could not participate in social gatherings. Moreover, late-stage patients could face high burden of medical costs as they came to health facilities after the advanced stage of the disease. Moreover, late-stage patients may not be effective and productive in their work area because of the illness. Regarding modality of treatment, cervical cancer patients who took any type of treatment (chemotherapy, radiotherapy and brachytherapy) had encountered higher social and economic impact compared to patients who did not start the treatment.

Limitations of the Study

This study is conducted a single institution and not community-based study, the selected study subjects were women who visited the Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital for the study on socioeconomic impact of cervical cancer patients because of suspecting themselves attended hospital for screening which may lead to selection bias and the impact of the problem is higher than the general population. Another community-based large-scale study is recommended.

Conclusion and Recommendations

Conclusion

This study indicates that most of cervical cancer patients had faced social discrimination which is mainly from their neighbors, community, close friends and husband while (69.2%) had made self-stigmatization because of bad smell of vaginal discharge, felt alone, rejection by others, and prolonged cancer hospitalization. Cervical cancer alters the physiological condition of the reproductive system as a result of metabolic change and self-image disturbance. Half of cervical cancer patients had infertility problems due to lose of their femininity and also most study participants have financial constraints due to the high cost of medical service. This study indicates that for patients with cervical cancer employment is very poor, even after being employed they were forced to resign due to pathological process of the disease (severity of their illness). Patients who lived in a rural area have higher financial challenges and social discrimination compared to patients who lived in an urban area and late stage of the disease worsen the social and financial problems.

Recommendations

On the basis of the findings of this study, the following recommendations are proposed: Enhance awareness of the society about the disease to reduce the social discrimination faced by cervical cancer patients. Health professionals need to provide psychotherapy treatment to patients and facilitate body image acceptance program that help patients to have a positive feeling about their current body image and avoid body appearance related distress. In order to improve the mental wellbeing of patients about their loss of femininity, health professionals need to provide advice and psychotherapy treatment for them. The government need to strengthen the support provided to cervical cancer patients in the form of subsidy and free treatment cost. Strengthen and design a strong policy that enables a health insurance scheme is implemented in the country to reduce the financial challenge that emanates from cervical cancer treatment. To reduce the work and employment challenge faced by cervical cancer patients, employers need to support patients by providing activities that are not stressful and physically challenging jobs. Enhance the availability of health-care facilities in rural parts of the country to reduce the nonmedical related cost of cervical cancer treatment. Researchers should conduct further studies regarding ways to reduce the negative socioeconomic impact of cervical cancer on patients.
  18 in total

1.  The relationship between symptom prevalence, body image, and quality of life in Asian gynecologic cancer patients.

Authors:  Irene Teo; Yin Bun Cheung; Timothy Yong Kuei Lim; Rama Padmavathi Namuduri; Victoria Long; Komal Tewani
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 2.  Global Cancer in Women: Burden and Trends.

Authors:  Lindsey A Torre; Farhad Islami; Rebecca L Siegel; Elizabeth M Ward; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.

Authors:  Hyuna Sung; Jacques Ferlay; Rebecca L Siegel; Mathieu Laversanne; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  The impact of socioeconomic status on survival after cancer in the United States : findings from the National Program of Cancer Registries Patterns of Care Study.

Authors:  Tim E Byers; Holly J Wolf; Katrina R Bauer; Susan Bolick-Aldrich; Vivien W Chen; Jack L Finch; John P Fulton; Maria J Schymura; Tiefu Shen; Scott Van Heest; Xiang Yin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Annual national direct and indirect cost estimates of the prevention and treatment of cervical cancer in Brazil.

Authors:  Hillegonda Maria Dutilh Novaes; Alexander Itria; Gulnar Azevedo e Silva; Ana Marli Christovam Sartori; Cristina Helena Rama; Patrícia Coelho de Soárez
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  The Situation of Cancer Treatment in Ethiopia: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Werissaw Haileselassie; Tefera Mulugeta; Wondemagegnhu Tigeneh; Mirgissa Kaba; Wajana Lako Labisso
Journal:  J Cancer Prev       Date:  2019-03-30

7.  An investigation of the effects of infertility on Women's quality of life: a case-control study.

Authors:  Katayoun Bakhtiyar; Ramin Beiranvand; Arash Ardalan; Farahnaz Changaee; Mohammad Almasian; Afsaneh Badrizadeh; Fatemeh Bastami; Farzad Ebrahimzadeh
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 2.809

8.  The economic burden of cervical cancer in Eswatini: Societal perspective.

Authors:  Cebisile Ngcamphalala; Ellinor Östensson; Themba G Ginindza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Body Image, Sexuality, and Sexual Functioning in Women With Gynecologic Cancer: An Integrative Review of the Literature and Implications for Research.

Authors:  Christina M Wilson; Deborah B McGuire; Beth L Rodgers; R K Elswick; Sarah M Temkin
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2021 Sep-Oct 01       Impact factor: 2.592

10.  Perception of Cervical Cancer Patients on their Financial Challenges in Western Kenya.

Authors:  Jane A Owenga; Erick Otieno Nyambedha
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Socioeconomic Impact of Cervical Cancer on Patients in Ethiopia: Evidence from Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital.

Authors:  Helen Endale; Tefera Mulugeta; Teshome Habte
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 3.602

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.