Literature DB >> 35530122

Predictive validity of the HCR-20V3 in a sample of Australian forensic psychiatric patients.

Delene M Brookstein1,2, Michael Daffern1,2, James R P Ogloff1,2, Rachel E Campbell2, Chi Meng Chu3,4.   

Abstract

The Historical Clinical Risk Management-20 Version 3 is the latest iteration in the HCR-20 series, adopting novel changes such as the addition of Relevance ratings and non-requirement to include the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. This study aimed to examine these changes and compare the predictive validity of the HCR-20V3 to the HCR-20V2. The sample comprised of 100 forensic psychiatric patients, retrospectively followed up for a maximum period of approximately 13 years post-discharge from the Thomas Embling Hospital. Recidivism data were sourced from official police records. Results indicated good to excellent inter-rater reliability. The HCR-20V3 significantly predicted violent recidivism (area under the curve = .70 to .77), levels of accuracy that were not significantly different from the HCR-20V2. HCR-20V3 Relevance ratings failed to add incremental validity above Presence ratings; however, the PCL-R improved upon the HCR-20V3's validity. The study represented one of the first evaluations of the HCR-20V3 in Australia.
© 2020 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HCR-20V3; Historical Clinical Risk Management-20 Version 3; PCL–R; Psychopathy Checklist–Revised; predictive validity; reliability; violence risk assessment

Year:  2020        PMID: 35530122      PMCID: PMC9068010          DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1775152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law        ISSN: 1321-8719


  16 in total

1.  Youth psychopathy and criminal recidivism: a meta-analysis of the psychopathy checklist measures.

Authors:  John F Edens; Justin S Campbell; John M Weir
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2007-02

2.  The assessment of dynamic risk among forensic psychiatric patients transitioning to the community.

Authors:  Stephanie R Penney; Lisa A Marshall; Alexander I F Simpson
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2016-02-25

Review 3.  A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: a systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants.

Authors:  Jay P Singh; Martin Grann; Seena Fazel
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-12-13

4.  Concurrent validity and clinical utility of the HCR-20V3 compared with the HCR-20 in forensic mental health nursing: similar tools but improved method.

Authors:  Stål Bjørkly; Gunnar Eidhammer; Lars Erik Selmer
Journal:  J Forensic Nurs       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.175

5.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Violence risk prediction. Clinical and actuarial measures and the role of the Psychopathy Checklist.

Authors:  M Dolan; M Doyle
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 9.319

8.  The role of psychopathic personality disorder in violence risk assessments using the HCR-20.

Authors:  Laura S Guy; Kevin S Douglas; Melissa C Hendry
Journal:  J Pers Disord       Date:  2010-10

9.  Violence by psychiatric patients: the impact of archival measurement source on violence base rates and risk assessment accuracy.

Authors:  Kevin S Douglas; James R Ogloff
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.356

10.  Assessing risk for aggression in forensic psychiatric inpatients: An examination of five measures.

Authors:  Neil R Hogan; Mark E Olver
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2016-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.