Literature DB >> 26914860

The assessment of dynamic risk among forensic psychiatric patients transitioning to the community.

Stephanie R Penney1, Lisa A Marshall2, Alexander I F Simpson1.   

Abstract

Individuals with serious mental illness (SMI; i.e., psychotic or major mood disorders) are vulnerable to experiencing multiple forms of adverse safety events in community settings, including violence perpetration and victimization. This study investigates the predictive validity and clinical utility of modifiable risk factors for violence in a sample of 87 forensic psychiatric patients found Not Criminally Responsible on Account of Mental Disorder (NCRMD) transitioning to the community. Using a repeated-measures prospective design, we assessed theoretically based dynamic risk factors (e.g., insight, psychiatric symptoms, negative affect, treatment compliance) before hospital discharge, and at 1 and 6 months postdischarge. Adverse outcomes relevant to this population (e.g., violence, victimization, hospital readmission) were measured at each community follow-up, and at 12 months postdischarge. The base rate of violence (23%) was similar to prior studies of discharged psychiatric patients, but results also highlighted elevated rates of victimization (29%) and hospital readmission (28%) characterizing this sample. Many of the dynamic risk indicators exhibited significant change across time and this change was related to clinically relevant outcomes. Specifically, while controlling for baseline level of risk, fluctuations in dynamic risk factors predicted the likelihood of violence and hospital readmission most consistently (hazard ratios [HR] = 1.35-1.84). Results provide direct support for the utility of dynamic factors in the assessment of violence risk and other adverse community outcomes, and emphasize the importance of incorporating time-sensitive methodologies into predictive models examining dynamic risk. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26914860     DOI: 10.1037/lhb0000183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Law Hum Behav        ISSN: 0147-7307


  4 in total

1.  Commentary: Risk Assessment in the Age of Evidence-Based Practice and Policy.

Authors:  Sarah L Desmarais
Journal:  Int J Forensic Ment Health       Date:  2017-01-31

2.  Predictive validity of the HCR-20V3 in a sample of Australian forensic psychiatric patients.

Authors:  Delene M Brookstein; Michael Daffern; James R P Ogloff; Rachel E Campbell; Chi Meng Chu
Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law       Date:  2020-06-16

3.  Violence after discharge from forensic units in the safe pilot study: a prospective study with matched pair design.

Authors:  Stål Bjørkly; Jon Magnus Wærstad; Lars Erik Selmer; Johnny Wærp; Martin Bjørnstad; John Vegard Leinslie; Gunnar Eidhammer; Kevin S Douglas
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2019-08-28

4.  The reconvictions of mentally disordered offenders-how, when, and where?

Authors:  Ebba Noland; Mattias Strandh; Fia Klötz Logan
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.630

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.