| Literature DB >> 35526000 |
Yidi Qin1, Kate F Kernan2, Zhenjiang Fan3, Hyun-Jung Park1, Soyeon Kim4, Scott W Canna4, John A Kellum2, Robert A Berg5, David Wessel6, Murray M Pollack6, Kathleen Meert7,8, Mark Hall9, Christopher Newth10, John C Lin11, Allan Doctor11, Tom Shanley12, Tim Cornell13, Rick E Harrison14, Athena F Zuppa4, Russell Banks12, Ron W Reeder12, Richard Holubkov12, Daniel A Notterman13,15, J Michael Dean12, Joseph A Carcillo16.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Thrombotic microangiopathy-induced thrombocytopenia-associated multiple organ failure and hyperinflammatory macrophage activation syndrome are important causes of late pediatric sepsis mortality that are often missed or have delayed diagnosis. The National Institutes of General Medical Science sepsis research working group recommendations call for application of new research approaches in extant clinical data sets to improve efficiency of early trials of new sepsis therapies. Our objective is to apply machine learning approaches to derive computable 24-h sepsis phenotypes to facilitate personalized enrollment in early anti-inflammatory trials targeting these conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Hyperferritinemic sepsis; Immunoparalysis-associated multiple organ failure; Macrophage activation syndrome; Multiple organ failure; Sequential multiple organ failure; Severe sepsis; Thrombocytopenia-associated multiple organ failure
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35526000 PMCID: PMC9077858 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-03977-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Crit Care ISSN: 1364-8535 Impact factor: 19.334
Fig. 1Overview of machine learning, visualization, and statistical methods applied to the PHENOMS pediatric sepsis data set
Demographic and day 1 clinical characteristics of the four phenotypes
| Characteristic1 | Total | PedSep-A | PedSep-B | PedSep-C | PedSep-D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients, | 404 (100) | 136 (34) | 102 (25) | 110 (27) | 56 (14) |
| Demographic | |||||
| Age years* mean (SD) | 7 (6) | 3 (4) | 8 (6)a | 10 (5)a,b | 8 (6)a |
| Male* | 224 (55.4) | 63 (46.3) | 68 (66.7)a | 59 (53.6) | 34 (60.7) |
| Female* | 180 (44.6) | 73 (53.7) | 34 (33.3) | 51 (46.4) | 22 (39.3) |
| Hispanic* | 67 (16.6) | 28 (20.6) | 12 (11.8) | 23 (20.9) | 4 (7.1) |
| Non-Hispanic* | 323 (80.0) | 100 (73.5) | 86 (84.3) | 86 (78.2) | 51 (91.1) |
| Previous healthy* | 180 (44.6) | 96 (70.6)b,c,d | 28 (27.5) | 37 (33.6) | 19 (33.9) |
| Surgery* | 49 (12.1) | 6 (4.4) | 19 (18.6)a | 12 (10.9) | 12 (21.4)a |
| Organ dysfunction | |||||
| SIRS criteria, mean (SD)2 | 2.9 (0.8) | 2.9 (0.8) | 3.0 (0.8) | 2.8 (0.8) | 3 (0.8) |
| OFI* mean (SD)3 | 1.8 (0.9) | 1.4 (0.5) | 2.1 (0.6)a,c | 1.4 (0.6) | 3.1 (1.0)a,b,c |
| Inflammation | |||||
| CRP mg/dL* mean (SD) | 11.7 (10.4) | 7.3 (7.3) | 13.2 (11.5)a | 15.2 (10.4)a | 13.1 (11.2)a |
| Low temperature °C* mean | 36.6 (1.2) | 36.7 (0.9)b | 36.0 (1.6) | 37.1 (0.9)a,b,d | 36.3 (1.0) |
| High temperature °C* mean | 37.8 (1.3) | 37.8 (1.1) | 37.4 (1.3) | 38.3 (1.2)a,b,d | 37.8 (1.4) |
| ALC/mm3* median (IQR) | 1.2 (0.6–2.1) | 1.9(1.3–3.2)b,c,d | 1.1(0.6–1.9)c | 0.6 (0.2–1.0) | 1.1(0.6–2.1)c |
| Ferritin ng/mL* median (IQR) | 218 (98.0–625.3) | 125(69.8–207.8) | 223(116.5–544.2)a | 405(176.2–1485.7)a,b | 610 (221.1–2482.0)a,b |
| Pulmonary | |||||
| Pulmonary OFI* | 270 (66.8) | 108 (79.4)c | 87 (85.3)c | 37 (33.6) | 38 (67.9)c |
| Intubation* | 211 (52.2) | 72 (52.9)c | 94 (92.2)a,c,d | 15 (13.6) | 30 (53.6)c |
| Cardiovascular or hemodynamic | |||||
| Heart rate bpm* mean (SD) | 155.4 (31.3) | 168.1 (30.8)b,c,d | 146.5 (27.9) | 150.4 (27.6) | 150.6 (35.8) |
| Systolic blood pressure*, mean (SD) mmHg | 81.9 (19.3) | 85.0 (15.7)b | 74.8 (22.0) | 86.3 (17.2)b | 78.9 (21.9) |
| Cardiovascular OFI* | 284 (70.3) | 63 (46.3) | 92 (90.2)a | 85 (77.3)a | 44 (78.6)a |
| Renal | |||||
| Creatinine mg/dL* median (IQR) | 0.5 (0.3–0.8) | 0.3 (0.2–0.4) | 0.6 (0.4–1.0)a | 0.6 (0.4–0.7)a | 1.4 (0.6–2.6)a,b,c |
| Renal OFI* | 30 (7.4) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 30 (53.6)a,b,c |
| Hepatic | |||||
| Hepatic OFI* | 40 (9.9) | 3 (2.2) | 9 (8.8) | 11 (10.0)a | 17 (30.4)a,b,c |
| Hematologic | |||||
| Hemoglobin g/dL* mean (SD) | 9.8 (2.0) | 10.1 (1.8)b,d | 9.4 (2.1) | 10.2 (2.1)b,d | 9.1 (1.8) |
| Platelets K/mm3* mean (SD) | 171.1 (123.2) | 260.1 (122.0)b,c,d | 154.3 (95.1)c,d | 118.8 (83.5)d | 88.2 (108.0) |
| Hematologic OFI* | 39 (9.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 8 (7.3)a,b | 31 (85.7)a,b,c |
| Neurologic | |||||
| Glasgow Coma Scale Score* mean (SD)4,5 | 8.7 (5.3) | 8.5 (5.2)b | 4.7 (3.4) | 13.2 (3.1)a,b,d | 7.9 (5.5)b |
| CNS OFI | 54 (13.4) | 12 (8.8) | 24 (23.5)a,c | 6 (5.5) | 12 (21.4)c |
IQR interquartile range, SIRS systemic inflammatory response syndrome, OFI organ failure index, ALC absolute lymphocyte count, CNS central nervous system
SI conversion factors: to convert alanine transaminase and aspartate aminotransferase to μkat/L, multiply by 0.0167; bilirubin to μmol/L, multiply by 17.104; C-reactive protein to nmol/L, multiply by 9.524; creatinine to μmol/L, multiply by 88.4
*Comparisons across all 4 computable phenotypes were performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, the χ2 test, or the Fisher’s exact test (Additional file 1: Table S3, p < 0.05 for all comparisons after adjustment)
1The variables in this table were log transformed for modeling (Additional file 1: Table S3). Comparisons across all 4 phenotypes were performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, the χ2 test, or the Fisher’s exact test (Additional file 1: Table S3. p < 0.05 for all comparisons after adjustment)
2Indicates SIRS criteria ranging from 0 to 4 including abnormal heart rate, respiratory rate, temperature, and white blood cell count
3OFI is an integer score reflecting the number of organ failures. Scores are either 0 or 1 for cardiovascular, hepatic, hematologic, respiratory, neurological, and renal, and summed for total range of 0 to 6. Cardiovascular, need for cardiovascular agent infusion support; Pulmonary, need for mechanical ventilation support with the ratio of the arterial partial pressure of oxygen and the fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) < 300 without this support; Hepatic, total bilirubin > 1.0 mg/dL and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 100 units/L; Renal, serum creatinine > 1.0 mg/dL and oliguria (urine output < 0.5 mL/kg/h); Hematologic, thrombocytopenia < 100,000/mm3 and prothrombin time INR > 1.5 × normal; Central Nervous System, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Score < 12 in the absence of sedatives
4Corresponds to minimum or maximum value (as appropriate) within 6 h of hospital presentation
5GCS ranges from 3 to 15
aThe outcome characteristic of this computable phenotype is significantly higher than PedSep-A (p value < 0.05)
bThe outcome characteristic of this computable phenotype is significantly higher than PedSep-B (p value < 0.05)
cThe outcome characteristic of this computable phenotype is significantly higher than PedSep-C (p value < 0.05)
dThe outcome characteristic of this computable phenotype is significantly higher than PedSep-D (p value < 0.05)
Fig. 224-hour phenotype distribution and chord plot. In panel A, visualization of phenotypes using t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) technique with phenotypes shown in color from the consensus k-means clustering analysis visualizes distinction among four phenotypes. In panels B–E, each phenotype is highlighted separately and the ribbons connect to the different patterns of clinical variables and organ system dysfunctions on the top of the circle (inflammation = low temperature, high temperature, max CRP, max ferritin; organ failure = total OFI; pulmonary = pulmonary OFI, intubation; cardiovascular = high heart rate, low systolic blood pressure, cardiovascular OFI; renal = high creatinine, renal OFI; hepatic = hepatic OFI; hematologic = low hemoglobin, low platelets, hematologic OFI; neurologic = Low Glasgow Coma Score Scale, central nervous system OFI). The chords connect from an individual phenotype to a category if the group mean involvement of the variables differs from the overall mean for the entire cohort (see Table 1) specifically lower for low temperature, systolic blood pressure, hemoglobin, platelets, and Glasgow Coma Scale Score, but higher for all other variables
Subsequent outcome characteristics of the four phenotypes
| Characteristice | Total | PedSep-A | PedSep-B | PedSep-C | PedSep-D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients, | 404 (100) | 136 (34) | 102 (25) | 110 (27) | 56 (14) |
| Development of subsequent MOF empirical phenotypes | |||||
| SMOF, | 7 (1.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.9) | 6 (10.7)a,b,c |
| TAMOF, | 37 (9.2) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (5.9)a | 3 (2.7) | 28 (50.0)a,b,c |
| IPMOF, | 85 (21.0) | 12 (8.8) | 29 (28.4)a | 22 (20) | 22 (39.3)a |
| MAS, | 24 (5.5) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (2.9) | 2 (1.8) | 19 (33.9)a,b,c |
| NPMOF, | 117 (29.0) | 28 (20.6) | 25 (24.5) | 32 (29.1) | 32 (57.1)a,b,c |
| Infections | |||||
| Bacterial infection, | 141 (34.9) | 43 (31.6) | 33 (32.4) | 45 (40.9) | 20 (35.7) |
| Viral infection, | 114 (28.2) | 60 (44.1)b,c,d | 21 (20.6) | 24 (21.8) | 9 (16.1) |
| Fungal infection, | 4 (1.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (5.4) |
| Culture negative, | 177 (43.8) | 47 (34.6) | 52 (51.0) | 50 (45.5) | 28 (50.0) |
| Sites of infectionsf | |||||
| Blood, | 51 (12.6) | 10 (7.4) | 6 (5.9) | 22 (20.0)a,b | 13 (23.2)a,b |
| Lung, | 76 (18.8) | 28 (20.6) | 29 (28.4) a,c,d | 12 (10.9) | 7 (12.5) |
| Urine, | 16 (4.0) | 4 (2.9) | 5 (4.9) | 6 (5.5) | 1 (1.8) |
| Organ support | |||||
| MechVent, | 366 (90.6) | 134 (98.5)c | 101 (99.0)c | 79 (71.8) | 52 (92.9)c |
| ECMO, | 30 (7.4) | 5 (3.7) | 9 (8.8) | 6 (5.5) | 10 (17.9)a |
| CRRT, | 52 (12.9) | 1 (0.7) | 7 (6.9) | 7 (6.4) | 37 (66.1)a,b,c |
| Anti-inflammatory therapies of interest | |||||
| Decadron, | 94 (23.3) | 50 (36.8)c,d | 22 (21.6) | 14 (12.7) | 8 (14.3) |
| Methylprednisolone, | 117 (29.0) | 54 (39.7)b | 23 (22.5) | 24 (21.8) | 16 (28.6) |
| IVIG, | 51 (12.6) | 6 (4.4) | 10 (9.8) | 19 (17.3)a | 16 (28.6)a |
| IVIG + Methylprednisolone | 23 (5.7) | 3 (2.2) | 4 (3.9) | 9 (8.2)a | 7 (12.5)a |
| Plasma exchange, | 25 (6.2) | 5 (3.7) | 4 (3.9) | 4 (3.6) | 12 (21.4)a,b,c |
| Plasma exchange + ECMO | 6 (1.5) | 1 (0.7) | 1 (1.0) | 1 (0.9) | 3 (5.4) |
| Outcome | |||||
| Length of stay, median (IQR), d | 9.0 (5.0–17.) | 9.0 (5.8–15)c | 10.5 (5.3–17)c | 6 (2.3–15) | 12.5 (7–26.5)c |
| Mortality, | 45 (11.1) | 3 (2.2) | 12 (11.7)a | 11 (10.0)a | 19 (33.9)a,b,c |
| PICU free days, median (IQR), d | 20.0 (8.0–25.0) | 21.0 (14.8–24.0)d | 19.0 (9.8–24.0)d | 24.0 (13.3–27)a,b,d | 4.5 (0.0–21.0) |
SMOF sequential liver failure-associated multiple organ failure, TAMOF thrombocytopenia-associated multiple organ failure, IPMOF immunoparalysis-associated multiple organ failure, MAS Macrophage Activation Syndrome, NPMOF new or progressive multiple organ failure, IQR interquartile range, MechVent mechanical ventilation, ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, CRRT continuous renal replacement therapies, IVIG intravenous gamma globulin
aThe outcome characteristic of this computable phenotype is significantly higher than PedSep-A (p value < 0.05)
bThe outcome characteristic of this computable phenotype is significantly higher than PedSep-B (p value < 0.05)
cThe outcome characteristic of this computable phenotype is significantly higher than PedSep-C (p value < 0.05)
dThe outcome characteristic of this computable phenotype is significantly higher than PedSep-D (p value < 0.05)
eComparisons across all 4 computable phenotypes were performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, the χ2 test, or the Fisher’s exact test (Additional file 1: Table S3, p < .05 for all comparisons after adjustment)
fObtained at the first 3 days
Fig. 3Ratio of inflammatory biomarkers according to 24-h phenotypes. The cytokine heatmap shows the log ratio of the median biomarker values for various markers of the host response and their hierarchical cluster relationships. Red represents a greater median biomarker value for that phenotype compared with the median for the entire study cohort, whereas blue represents a lower median biomarker value compared with the median for the entire study cohort. For example, M-CSF is lower in PedSep-A than the entire study cohort and is higher in PedSep-D than the entire study cohort
Fig. 4Comparison of relationships of 25 variables to mortality in PedSep-A, B, C, and D. In all panels, the variables are standardized such that all means are scaled to 0 and SDs to 1. A value of 1 for the standardized variable value (x-axis) signifies that the mean value for the phenotype was 1 SD higher, or lower for − 1, than the mean value for the phenotypes shown in the graph as a whole. CNS central nervous system, CRPH C-reactive protein, GCS Glasgow Coma Scale, Hemat hematologic, Intubate intubation with endotracheal tube, OFI organ failure index, Post-Op post-surgery, Pulm pulmonary, Temp temperature, SBP systolic blood pressure, Chronic illness those who are not recorded as previous healthy, Ethnicity value is higher with more non-Hispanics in group, Sex value is higher with more males in group
Fig. 5Organ failure and mortality curves over 28 days among 24-h phenotypes. Number of organ failures and mortality according to PedSep-A, B, C, and D phenotype over 28 days. Both short-term mortality (panel A) and organ failure (panel B) show significant differences by phenotype (p < 0.001). The mean numbers of organ failures and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are calculated each day by non-nested observation, where we do not carry forward the OFI at the time the patient leaves the PICU alive or dead. As a reference for patients at risk for Panel B, Panel C shows the number of children remaining in the PCU at day 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28
Fig. 6Heterogeneous treatment interactions and mortality risks among the phenotypes. Heatmap of Elastic Net Regression analysis shows the association between 14 individual therapies (diagonal values) and their 91 combination interactions (total cells = 105) with mortality in PedSep-B, C, and D among children who received anti-inflammatory therapies. The PedSep-A phenotype is not presented due to limited number of deaths. Blank cells have no patients. Values in each cell represent odds ratios of mortality, where 1 represents no association with mortality. Color in each cell represents direction of effect, where red represents mortality direction, green represents survival direction. Cells located at the diagonal are odds ratio of association from the 14 individual therapies. The other cells represent the mortality odds ratio of combinations of these therapies compared to all other combinations. For example, survivors in PedSep-D phenotype are less likely to be treated with IVIG than non-survivors (red), whereas survivors in PedSep-D are more likely to be treated with combined IVIG + methylprednisolone (green). This machine analysis method does not allow calculation of confidence intervals