| Literature DB >> 35521619 |
Juan He1, Man-Si Yang1, Wen-Xiang Wang2, Zheng-Hui Li1, Waill Ahmed Mohamed Elkhateeb3, Ting-Chi Wen4, Hong-Lian Ai1,2, Tao Feng1.
Abstract
A bioguided separation on the cultures of the potato endophytic fungus Bipolaris eleusines led to the isolation of two anti-phytopathogenic (Alternaria solani) sesquiterpenoid-xanthone adducts, namely bipolins I and J (1 and 2). Their structures were established via extensive spectroscopic analysis. Compounds 1 and 2 exhibit potent inhibitory activity against A. solani with MIC values of 8 and 16 μg mL-1, respectively. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 35521619 PMCID: PMC9059304 DOI: 10.1039/c8ra09861a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1The growth inhibition of potato endophytic fungus B. eleusines against potato pathogen Alternaria solani on PDA.
Fig. 2Structures of bipolenins I and J (1 and 2) from cultures of the fungus Bipolaris eleusines.
1H (500 MHz) and 13C (125 MHz) NMR data of 1 and 2 in CDCl3 (δ in ppm, J in Hz)
| No. | 1 | 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1 | 137.2, s | 125.5, s | ||
| 2 | 164.9, s | 161.3, s | ||
| 3 | 50.9, s | 50.5, s | ||
| 4 | 33.8, t | 1.38, m | 33.6, t | 1.34, m |
| 5a | 25.0, t | 1.72, m | 24.9, t | 1.71, m |
| 5b | 0.84, m | 0.97, m | ||
| 6 | 44.6, d | 0.98, m | 44.9, d | 0.96, m |
| 7 | 41.7, d | 3.11, br s | 43.6, d | 3.10, br s |
| 8 | 18.4, q | 1.05, s | 18.9, q | 1.00, s |
| 9 | 31.5, t | 0.97, m | 31.5, d | 1.17, m |
| 10 | 20.6, q | 0.71, s | 20.8, q | 0.74, d (6.5) |
| 11 | 21.3, q | 0.95, s | 21.4, q | 0.93, d (6.5) |
| 12 | 10.6, q | 2.01, s | 12.5, q | 2.00, s |
| 13 | 57.5, d | 1.81, dd (8.6, 5.6) | 58.0, d | 1.79, dd (8.3, 5.5) |
| 14a | 65.8, t | 4.21, dd (11.1, 5.6) | 66.0, t | 4.26, dd (11.2, 5.5) |
| 14b | 3.89, dd (11.1, 5.6) | 3.94, dd (11.2, 8.3) | ||
| 15 | 187.9, d | 10.00, s | 168.6, s | |
| 1′ | 160.9, s | 160.9, s | ||
| 2′ | 113.5, d | 6.68, s | 113.5, d | 6.66, br s |
| 3′ | 147.4, s | 147.4, s | ||
| 4′ | 107.9, d | 6.74, s | 107.9, d | 6.73, br s |
| 4a′ | 157.2, s | 157.2, s | ||
| 5′a | 78.0, d | 5.69, ddd (6.3, 4.3, 4.0) | 78.0, d | 5.70, ddd (6.4, 4.3, 4.0) |
| 5′b | ||||
| 6′a | 37.6, t | 2.97, dd (16.0, 4.3) | 37.6, t | 2.97, dd (16.1, 4.3) |
| 6′b | 2.82, dd (16.0, 6.3) | 2.82, dd (16.1, 6.4) | ||
| 7′ | 169.4, s | 169.5, s | ||
| 8′ | 79.4, d | 5.58, d (4.0) | 79.4, d | 5.60, d (4.0) |
| 8a′ | 114.5, s | 114.6, s | ||
| 9′ | 178.0, s | 177.9, s | ||
| 9a′ | 108.9, s | 108.9, s | ||
| 10a′ | 167.5, s | 167.5, s | ||
| 1′′ | 22.3, q | 2.41, s | 22.3, q | 2.40, s |
| 2′′ | 169.3, s | 169.3, s | ||
| OMe | 52.2, q | 3.73, s | 52.2, q | 3.73, s |
| 1′-OH | 12.09, s | 12.10, s | ||
Fig. 3Key 2D NMR correlations of 1.
Inhibitions of 1 and 2 on four phytopathogens (μg mL−1)
| Comps |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NA | 8 | NA | 64 |
| 2 | NA | 16 | NA | NA |
| Hygromycin B | 8 | <4 | 8 | 64 |
Positive control; NA: no activity.