Literature DB >> 35520464

ASPiH standards for simulation-based education: process of consultation, design and implementation.

Makani Purva1,2, Jane Nicklin3,4.   

Abstract

There is widespread enthusiasm and emerging evidence of the efficacy of simulation-based education (SBE) but the full potential of SBE has not been explored. The Association for Simulated Practice in Healthcare (ASPiH) is a not-for-profit membership association with members from healthcare, education and patient safety background. ASPiH's National Simulation Development Project in 2012 identified the lack of standardisation in the approach to SBE with failure to adopt best practice in design and delivery of SBE programmes. ASPiH created a standards project team in 2015 to address this need. The article describes the iterative process modelled on implementation science framework, spread over six stages and 2 years that resulted in the creation of the standards. The consultation process supported by Health Education England resulted in a unique document that was driven by front line providers while also having strong foundations in evidence base. The final ASPiH document consisting of 21 standards for SBE has been extensively mapped to regulatory and professional bodies in the UK and abroad ensuring that the document is relevant to a wide healthcare audience. Underpinning the standards is a detailed guidance document that summarises the key literature evidence to support the standard statements. It is envisaged the standards will be widely used by the simulation community for quality assurance and improving the standard of SBE delivered. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  consultation; evidence-base; simulation-based education; standards

Year:  2018        PMID: 35520464      PMCID: PMC8936929          DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn        ISSN: 2056-6697


  16 in total

1.  Training surgical residents: the current Canadian perspective.

Authors:  Roxana Geoffrion; Jae Won Choi; Gretchen M Lentz
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 2.891

2.  Current assessment and future directions of surgical skills laboratories.

Authors:  Muneera R Kapadia; Debra A DaRosa; Helen M MacRae; Gary L Dunnington
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 3.  Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation.

Authors:  Joseph A Durlak; Emily P DuPre
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2008-06

Review 4.  A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009.

Authors:  William C McGaghie; S Barry Issenberg; Emil R Petrusa; Ross J Scalese
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 5.  Standing on the shoulders of giants: contemplating a standard national curriculum for surgical training in gynaecology.

Authors:  Roxana Geoffrion
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2008-08

6.  Translational educational research: a necessity for effective health-care improvement.

Authors:  William C McGaghie; S Barry Issenberg; Elaine R Cohen; Jeffrey H Barsuk; Diane B Wayne
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  How much evidence does it take? A cumulative meta-analysis of outcomes of simulation-based education.

Authors:  David A Cook
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 6.251

8.  A Survey of Simulation Utilization in Anesthesiology Residency Programs in the United States.

Authors:  Lauryn R Rochlen; Michelle Housey; Ian Gannon; Alan R Tait; Norah Naughton; Sachin Kheterpal
Journal:  A A Case Rep       Date:  2016-06-01

9.  Evaluating the impact of simulation on translational patient outcomes.

Authors:  William C McGaghie; Timothy J Draycott; William F Dunn; Connie M Lopez; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.929

Review 10.  Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review.

Authors:  S Barry Issenberg; William C McGaghie; Emil R Petrusa; David Lee Gordon; Ross J Scalese
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.