Literature DB >> 20078756

A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009.

William C McGaghie1, S Barry Issenberg, Emil R Petrusa, Ross J Scalese.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This article reviews and critically evaluates historical and contemporary research on simulation-based medical education (SBME). It also presents and discusses 12 features and best practices of SBME that teachers should know in order to use medical simulation technology to maximum educational benefit.
METHODS: This qualitative synthesis of SBME research and scholarship was carried out in two stages. Firstly, we summarised the results of three SBME research reviews covering the years 1969-2003. Secondly, we performed a selective, critical review of SBME research and scholarship published during 2003-2009.
RESULTS: The historical and contemporary research synthesis is reported to inform the medical education community about 12 features and best practices of SBME: (i) feedback; (ii) deliberate practice; (iii) curriculum integration; (iv) outcome measurement; (v) simulation fidelity; (vi) skill acquisition and maintenance; (vii) mastery learning; (viii) transfer to practice; (ix) team training; (x) high-stakes testing; (xi) instructor training, and (xii) educational and professional context. Each of these is discussed in the light of available evidence. The scientific quality of contemporary SBME research is much improved compared with the historical record.
CONCLUSIONS: Development of and research into SBME have grown and matured over the past 40 years on substantive and methodological grounds. We believe the impact and educational utility of SBME are likely to increase in the future. More thematic programmes of research are needed. Simulation-based medical education is a complex service intervention that needs to be planned and practised with attention to organisational contexts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20078756     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  252 in total

Review 1.  Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence.

Authors:  William C McGaghie; S Barry Issenberg; Elaine R Cohen; Jeffrey H Barsuk; Diane B Wayne
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 2.  [Organ protective intensive care treatment and simulation-based training].

Authors:  J W Rey; T Ott; D Bösebeck; S Welschehold; P R Galle; C Werner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Systematic review of validity testing in colonoscopy simulation.

Authors:  James Ansell; John Mason; Neil Warren; Peter Donnelly; Neil Hawkes; Sunil Dolwani; Jared Torkington
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Medical simulation in respiratory and critical care medicine.

Authors:  Godfrey Lam; Najib T Ayas; Donald E Griesdale; Adam D Peets
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 2.584

5.  Manifesto for family medicine educational research.

Authors:  Charo Rodríguez; Gillian Bartlett-Esquilant; Miriam Boillat; Marion Dove; Roland Grad; Leonora Lalla; Pierre Pluye; Pierre-Paul Tellier; Howard Bergman
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Use of neonatal simulation models to assess competency in bag-mask ventilation.

Authors:  S A Pearlman; S C Zern; T Blackson; J A Ciarlo; A B Mackley; R G Locke
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.521

7.  Low-Cost Simulation: How-To Guide.

Authors:  Herodotos Ellinas; Kathryn Denson; Deborah Simpson
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-06

Review 8.  SIMMED SIMulation in MEDicine, Italian Society for simulation in medicine position paper: executive summary.

Authors:  Paola Santalucia; Augusto Zaninelli; Luca Ragazzoni; Gian Franco Gensini
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 9.  Simulation-based airway management training: application and looking forward.

Authors:  Dong Yang; Yu-Kui Wei; Fu-Shan Xue; Xiao-Ming Deng; Juan Zhi
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 10.  Educational Tools: Thinking Outside the Box.

Authors:  Majka Woods; Mark E Rosenberg
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 8.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.