| Literature DB >> 35519449 |
Yilin Xie1, Herui Liu1, Li Lin1, Maojun Zhao1, Li Zhang1, Yunsong Zhang1, Yichao Wu1.
Abstract
In this study, a method using natural deep eutectic solvents (NADES) combined with microwave-assistance extraction (MAE) was researched for the first time to establish an environmentally-friendly method for extracting ferulic acid from Ligusticum chuanxiong Hort. 20 kinds of NADES were initially screened, then response surface methodology was performed to optimize the NADES-MAE extraction of ferulic acid in L. c on the basis of the results of single-factor experiments. The results demonstrated that NADES could provide better extraction yields of ferulic acid than conventional solvents, and the combination of choline chloride and 1,2-propanediol was the most effective. The optimal conditions were an extraction time of 20 min, an extraction temperature of 68 °C, and a solvent-to-solid ratio of 30 : 1 mL g-1. Under these conditions, the extraction yield of ferulic acid with NADES-MAE (2.32 mg g-1) was higher than that using traditional extraction methods. This research demonstrates that this approach, which adopts NADES as a green solvent and MAE as an assistant extraction technique, could be an excellent choice to design an environmentally-friendly method for extracting phenolic compounds in various materials. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 35519449 PMCID: PMC9067139 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra02665g
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Different systems of natural deep eutectic solventsa
| Number | Abbreviation | Component 1 | Component 2 | Component 3 | Mol ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CCG | Choline chloride | Glucose | — | 1 : 1 |
| 2 | CCM | Choline chloride | Maltose | — | 1 : 1 |
| 3 | CCS | Choline chloride | Sucrose | — | 1 : 1 |
| 4 | CCLA | Choline chloride | Lactic acid | — | 1 : 1 |
| 5 | CCOA | Choline chloride | Oxalic acid | — | 1 : 1 |
| 6 | CCCA | Choline chloride | Citric acid | — | 1 : 1 |
| 7 | CCMA | Choline chlorate | Malic acid | — | 1 : 1 |
| 8 | CCEo | Choline chloride | Ethylene glycol | — | 1 : 1 |
| 9 | CCPo | Choline chloride | 1,2-Propanediol | — | 1 : 1 |
| 10 | CCGo | Choline chloride | Glycerol | — | 1 : 1 |
| 11 | MAGGo | Malic acid | Glucose | Glycerol | 1 : 1 : 1 |
| 12 | MASGo | Malic acid | Sucrose | Glycerol | 1 : 1 : 1 |
| 13 | MAG | Malic acid | Glucose | — | 1 : 1 |
| 14 | MAS | Malic acid | Sucrose | — | 1 : 1 |
| 15 | LAG | Lactic acid | Glucose | — | 1 : 1 |
| 16 | LAS | Lactic acid | Sucrose | — | 1 : 1 |
| 17 | CAG | Citric acid | Glucose | — | 1 : 1 |
| 18 | CAM | Citric acid | Maltose | — | 1 : 1 |
| 19 | CAS | Citric acid | Sucrose | — | 1 : 1 |
| 20 | CAMA | Citric acid | Malic acid | — | 1 : 1 |
—: not added.
Fig. 1HPLC chromatograms of ferulic acid at 320 nm: (a) reference compounds and (b) sample.
Independent factors and their levels used in MAE
| Independent factor | Symbol | Levels | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Extraction time (min) | A | 10 | 15 | 20 |
| Extraction temperature (°C) | B | 50 | 60 | 70 |
| Solvent-to-solid ratio (mL g−1) | C | 20 : 1 | 25 : 1 | 30 : 1 |
Fig. 2Extraction yields with different solvents (a), molar ratios (b) and water content (c) for ferulic acid.
Box–Behnken design of independent variables and obtained data
| Run | Factor | Extraction yield (mg g−1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | ||
| 1 | 10 | 50 | 25 | 2.00 |
| 2 | 20 | 60 | 30 | 2.33 |
| 3 | 10 | 60 | 20 | 2.18 |
| 4 | 20 | 50 | 25 | 2.18 |
| 5 | 10 | 70 | 25 | 2.28 |
| 6 | 15 | 60 | 25 | 2.28 |
| 7 | 15 | 70 | 20 | 2.25 |
| 8 | 15 | 60 | 25 | 2.28 |
| 9 | 15 | 70 | 30 | 2.38 |
| 10 | 15 | 60 | 25 | 2.25 |
| 11 | 15 | 60 | 25 | 2.29 |
| 12 | 20 | 70 | 25 | 2.34 |
| 13 | 15 | 50 | 30 | 2.04 |
| 14 | 15 | 60 | 25 | 2.27 |
| 15 | 15 | 50 | 20 | 2.05 |
| 16 | 10 | 60 | 30 | 2.28 |
| 17 | 20 | 60 | 20 | 2.31 |
ANOVA of quadratic model for the extraction yields of ferulic acid
| Source | Sum of squares | DF | Mean square |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 0.19 | 9 | 0.021 | 56.52 | < 0.0001 |
| A | 0.022 | 1 | 0.022 | 58.91 | 0.0001 |
| B | 0.12 | 1 | 0.12 | 320.74 | <0.0001 |
| C | 7.200 × 10−3 | 1 | 7.200 × 10−3 | 19.24 | 0.0032 |
| AB | 3.600 × 10−3 | 1 | 3.600 × 10−3 | 9.62 | 0.0173 |
| AC | 1.600 × 10−3 | 1 | 1.600 × 10−3 | 4.27 | 0.0775 |
| BC | 4.900 × 10−3 | 1 | 4.900 × 10−3 | 13.09 | 0.0085 |
| A2 | 4.642 × 10−4 | 1 | 4.642 × 10−3 | 1.24 | 0.3022 |
| B2 | 0.030 | 1 | 0.030 | 80.32 | <0.0001 |
| C2 | 3.800 × 10−4 | 1 | 3.800 × 10−3 | 1.02 | 0.3472 |
| Residual | 2.620 × 10−3 | 7 | 3.743 × 10−3 | ||
| Lack of fit | 1.700 × 10−3 | 3 | 5.667 × 10−3 | 2.46 | 0.2020 |
| Pure error | 9.200 × 10−4 | 4 | 2.300 × 10−3 | ||
| Cor total | 0.19 | 16 | |||
| Std. dev. | 0.019 |
| 0.9864 | ||
| Mean | 2.23 | Adj | 0.9690 | ||
| C.V. % | 0.87 | Pred | 0.8516 | ||
| PRESS | 0.029 | Adeq precision | 25.104 |
Fig. 33D response surface plots of the interactions between three extraction factors (extraction time, extraction temperature and the solvent-to-solid ratio).
Comparison of the optimal method with reference methods
| Method | Extraction conditions | Extraction yield (mg g−1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solvent | Method | Temperature | Time | ||
| Ref-1 | 28 mL g−1 73%EtOH | Heating | 83 °C | 4 h | 1.54 ± 0.26 |
| Ref-2 | 28 mL g−1 73%EtOH | MAE | 68 °C | 20 min | 1.84 ± 0.04 |
| Ref-3 | 30 mL g−1 NADES | Heating | 83 °C | 4 h | 2.24 ± 0.03 |
| Optimal method | 30 mL g−1 NADES | MAE | 68 °C | 20 min | 2.32 ± 0.01 |
Fig. 4Ferulic acid yields for the five different extraction methods using CCPo.
Fig. 5Ferulic acid extraction yield acquired in a 50-fold scaled-up experiment (left) and a small-scale experiment (right).