Literature DB >> 35517908

Characteristics of participants who withdraw from surgical simulation-based educational research.

Camila Vega Vega1,2, Hannah Claire Gostlow1,2, Nicholas Marlow1,2, Wendy Babidge1,2, Guy Maddern1,2.   

Abstract

Introduction: The problems associated with recruitment and retention of patients in clinical trials have been widely addressed in literature; however, similar problems associated with healthcare workers are rarely reported. The aim of this paper is to outline the factors that can impede a participant's successful participation in a research project and to analyse the characteristics of participants that withdrew.
Methods: The Laparoscopic Simulation Skills Program (LSSP) was a prospective randomised cohort study investigating the efficacy of self-directed learning for basic laparoscopic skills acquisition. Two hundred and seven medical students, junior doctors, as well as surgical and gynaecology trainees were enrolled between June 2015 and November 2016.
Results: Fifty-six (27%) participants failed to attend the final assessment. Of these, 43 participants (77%) responded to the follow-up survey and/or phone contact regarding non-attendance. Most participants failed to attend due to lack of free time/conflicting clinical duties and university requirements. Participants who did not attend the final assessment and did not provide further responses were less motivated by a career in surgery, surgical simulation and perceived less benefits of laparoscopic simulation. The 43 participants who answered the survey and/or phone contact provided similar responses to the participants who completed the study requirements and had more intrinsic motivators to enrol. Conclusions: Clinical duties and other educational commitments are the biggest barriers to participation in simulation based-education research. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  simulation training; simulation-based education; simulation-based learning; surgical education; surgical research

Year:  2018        PMID: 35517908      PMCID: PMC8936532          DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn        ISSN: 2056-6697


  13 in total

1.  Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman; Melina C Vassiliou; Shannon A Fraser; Donna Stanbridge; Gabriela Ghitulescu; Christopher G Andrew
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Unexpected collateral effects of simulation-based medical education.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Barsuk; Elaine R Cohen; Joe Feinglass; William C McGaghie; Diane B Wayne
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  What is the cost associated with the implementation and maintenance of an ACS/APDS-based surgical skills curriculum?

Authors:  Enrico Danzer; Kristoffel Dumon; Gretchen Kolb; Lori Pray; Ben Selvan; Andrew S Resnick; Jon B Morris; Noel N Williams
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.891

4.  Validation of a structured training and assessment curriculum for technical skill acquisition in minimally invasive surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter; Neil Orzech; Richard K Reznick; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Research in general practice: a survey of incentives and disincentives for research participation.

Authors:  Henry Brodaty; Louisa Hr Gibson; Melissa L Waine; Allan M Shell; Ruth Lilian; Constance Dimity Pond
Journal:  Ment Health Fam Med       Date:  2013-09

6.  Recruitment and retention challenges and successes.

Authors:  Trina M Aguirre; Ann E Koehler; Ashish Joshi; Susan L Wilhelm
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 7.  Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review.

Authors:  S Barry Issenberg; William C McGaghie; Emil R Petrusa; David Lee Gordon; Ross J Scalese
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 8.  Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities.

Authors:  Peter Bower; Valerie Brueton; Carrol Gamble; Shaun Treweek; Catrin Tudur Smith; Bridget Young; Paula Williamson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Effect of simulated patient death on emergency worker's anxiety: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  A L Philippon; J Bokobza; B Bloom; A Hurbault; A Duguet; B Riou; Y Freund
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 6.925

10.  Challenges in recruitment and retention of clinical trial subjects.

Authors:  Rashmi Ashish Kadam; Sanghratna Umakant Borde; Sapna Amol Madas; Sundeep Santosh Salvi; Sneha Saurabh Limaye
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.