Literature DB >> 22000539

What is the cost associated with the implementation and maintenance of an ACS/APDS-based surgical skills curriculum?

Enrico Danzer1, Kristoffel Dumon, Gretchen Kolb, Lori Pray, Ben Selvan, Andrew S Resnick, Jon B Morris, Noel N Williams.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost associated with the American College of Surgery (ACS)/Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS)-based surgical skills curriculum (SSC) within a general surgery residency program.
METHODS: The Penn Surgical Simulation Center (PSSC) of the University of Pennsylvania was established by the Department of Surgery during the 2006-2007 academic year and became a Level-I ACS Accredited Education Institute in 2008. Each academic year, 38 junior residents are assigned to a 4-week dedicated simulation rotation based on the ACS/APDS-based SSC. In conjunction with voluntary participation by faculty, a salaried educational fellow is responsible for maintaining the schedule and administering the surgical skills training modules. The costs associated with the ACS/APDS-based SSC were divided in initial implementation capital expenses and annual operational maintenance expenses.
RESULTS: The overall capital expenditures associated with the implementation of the curriculum were $4.204 million. These costs included the purchase of low and high-fidelity simulation equipment and initial construction costs to renovate a previous operating room (OR) and recovery suite into the Penn Medicine Clinical Simulation Center (PMCSC) which has housed the PSSC since 2008. The annual operational expenses are $476,000 and include the salary for the educational fellow, disposables, and other supplies, and the PMCSC average student fees. The annual cost per resident for the 4-week dedicated simulation rotation is $12,516. This figure does not include the average cost for teaching efforts including the simulation teaching per participating faculty member which is $30,000 in Relative Teaching Value Units per year.
CONCLUSIONS: The expenditures associated with the implementation and maintenance of the ACS/APDS-based surgical skills curriculum in a surgical residency program are significant. This center's experience might be useful to programs deciding on more cost-effective means of implementing the ACS/APDS-SSC into their training.
Copyright © 2011 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22000539     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  8 in total

1.  MIS in the management of colon and rectal cancer: consensus meeting of the Colorectal Cancer Association of Canada.

Authors:  Christopher M Schlachta; Shady Ashamalla; Andy Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Interactive translational research model and cadaveric simulation: where minimally invasive cardiac surgery and industry meet.

Authors:  Davida A Robinson; Jessie H Evans; Angelo J Martellaro; Carl A Johnson; Jude S Sauer; Peter A Knight
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-08

3.  Outcomes of Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) mastery training standards applied to an ergonomically different, lower cost platform.

Authors:  Sarah B Placek; Brenton R Franklin; Sarah M Haviland; Mercy D Wagner; Mary T O'Donnell; Chad T Cryer; Kristen D Trinca; Elliott Silverman; E Matthew Ritter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Characteristics of participants who withdraw from surgical simulation-based educational research.

Authors:  Camila Vega Vega; Hannah Claire Gostlow; Nicholas Marlow; Wendy Babidge; Guy Maddern
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2018-11-29

Review 5.  The effects of graduate competency-based education and mastery learning on patient care and return on investment: a narrative review of basic anesthetic procedures.

Authors:  Claus Hedebo Bisgaard; Sune Leisgaard Mørck Rubak; Svein Aage Rodt; Jens Aage Kølsen Petersen; Peter Musaeus
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Linking quality of care and training costs: cost-effectiveness in health professions education.

Authors:  Martin G Tolsgaard; Ann Tabor; Mette E Madsen; Camilla B Wulff; Liv Dyre; Charlotte Ringsted; Lone N Nørgaard
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  Comparison of simulation debriefs with traditional needs assessment methods: a qualitative exploratory study in a critical care community setting.

Authors:  Aimee J Sarti; Rola Ajjawi; Stephanie Sutherland; Angele Landriault; John Kim; Pierre Cardinal
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  A targeted systematic review of cost analyses for implementation of simulation-based education in healthcare.

Authors:  Daniel S Hippe; Rachel A Umoren; Alex McGee; Sherri L Bucher; Brian W Bresnahan
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2020-03-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.