Literature DB >> 35517904

Patients and hospital managers want laparoscopic simulation training to become mandatory before live operating: a multicentre qualitative study of stakeholder perceptions.

Jessica Preshaw1, Dimitrios Siassakos2, Mark James3, Timothy Draycott2, Sanjay Vyas1, Christy Burden4.   

Abstract

Background: Surgical procedures are complex and susceptible to human error. Individual surgical skill correlates with improved patient outcomes demonstrating that surgical proficiency is vitally important for patient safety. Evidence demonstrates that simulation training improves laparoscopic surgical skills; however, projects to implement and integrate laparoscopic simulation into core surgical curricula have had varied success. One barrier to successful implementation has been the lack of awareness and prioritisation of simulation initiatives by key stakeholders. Objective: To determine the knowledge and perceptions of patients and hospital managers on laparoscopic surgery and simulation training in patient safety and healthcare. Method: A qualitative study was conducted in the Southwest of England. 40 semistructured interviews were undertaken with patients attending general gynaecology clinics and general surgical and gynaecology hospital managers.
Results: Six key themes identified included: positive expectations of laparoscopic surgery; perceptions of problems and financial implications of laparoscopic surgery; lack of awareness of difficulties with surgical training; desire for laparoscopic simulation training and competency testing for patient benefit; conflicting priorities of laparoscopic simulation in healthcare; and drawbacks of surgical simulation training. Patients and managers were largely unaware of the risks of laparoscopic surgery and challenges for training. Managers highlighted conflicting financial priorities when purchasing educational equipment. Patients stated that they would have greater confidence in a surgeon who had undertaken mandatory surgical simulation training and perceived purchasing simulation equipment to be a high priority in the National Health Services. Most patients and hospital managers believed trainees should pass an examination on a simulator prior to live operating. Conclusions: Competency-based mandatory laparoscopic simulation was strongly supported by the majority of stakeholders to augment the initial learning curve of surgeons. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  laparoscopic surgery; patient safety; simulation; surgical training

Year:  2018        PMID: 35517904      PMCID: PMC8990187          DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn        ISSN: 2056-6697


  22 in total

Review 1.  Integration of laparoscopic virtual-reality simulation into gynaecology training.

Authors:  C Burden; J Oestergaard; C R Larsen
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.531

2.  Characterising 'near miss' events in complex laparoscopic surgery through video analysis.

Authors:  Esther M Bonrath; Lauren E Gordon; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 3.  Systematic review of the implementation of simulation training in surgical residency curriculum.

Authors:  Yo Kurashima; Satoshi Hirano
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Surgical coaching for individual performance improvement.

Authors:  Caprice C Greenberg; Hala N Ghousseini; Sudha R Pavuluri Quamme; Heather L Beasley; Douglas A Wiegmann
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Trainee participation is associated with adverse outcomes in emergency general surgery: an analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

Authors:  George Kasotakis; Aliya Lakha; Beda Sarkar; Hiroko Kunitake; Nicole Kissane-Lee; Tracey Dechert; David McAneny; Peter Burke; Gerard Doherty
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Operative laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of ectopic pregnancy: a prospective trial.

Authors:  A A Murphy; C W Nager; J J Wujek; L M Kettel; V A Torp; H G Chin
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Outcomes associated with resident involvement in partial colectomy.

Authors:  James C Iannuzzi; Aaron S Rickles; Andrew-Paul Deeb; Abhiram Sharma; Fergal J Fleming; John R T Monson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  The role of simulation in urological training - A quantitative study of practice and opinions.

Authors:  Abdullatif Aydin; Kamran Ahmed; Ahmed M A Shafi; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 2.392

Review 9.  Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with limited prior laparoscopic experience.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Myura Nagendran; Clare D Toon; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-03-01

Review 10.  Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Myura Nagendran; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Rajesh Aggarwal; Marilena Loizidou; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-08-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.