Literature DB >> 23303150

Outcomes associated with resident involvement in partial colectomy.

James C Iannuzzi1, Aaron S Rickles, Andrew-Paul Deeb, Abhiram Sharma, Fergal J Fleming, John R T Monson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical cases that include trainees are associated with worse outcomes in comparison with those that include attending surgeons alone.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify whether resident involvement in partial colectomy was associated with worse outcomes when evaluated by surgical approach and resident experience.
DESIGN: This is a retrospective study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. SETTINGS: This study evaluates cases included in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. PATIENTS: All patients were included who underwent partial colectomy including both open and laparoscopic approaches.
INTERVENTIONS: Residents were involved. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were the association of resident involvement and major complication events, minor complication events, unplanned return to operating room, and operative time.
RESULTS: Cases with residents were associated with major complications (OR 1.18, CI 1.09-1.27, p < 0.001) on multivariate analysis. However, after including operative time in the model only open cases involving fifth year residents were still associated with major complications (OR 1.13, p = 0.037). Resident involvement was associated with increased likelihood of minor complications (OR 1.3, p < 0.001) and an increased risk of unplanned return to the operating room (OR 1.20, p < 0.001). Operative time was longer for cases with residents on average by 33.7 minutes and 27 minutes for open and laparoscopic cases. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective design and lack of data on teachings status, case complexity, and intraoperative evaluation of technique.
CONCLUSIONS: Resident involvement in partial colectomies is associated with an increased major complications, minor complications, likelihood of return to the operating room, and operative time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23303150     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318276862f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  10 in total

1.  Laparoscopic appendectomy as an index procedure for surgical trainees: clinical outcomes and learning curve.

Authors:  Alessandro Ussia; Samuele Vaccari; Gaetano Gallo; Ugo Grossi; Riccardo Ussia; Lodovico Sartarelli; Margherita Minghetti; Augusto Lauro; Paolo Barbieri; S Di Saverio; Maurizio Cervellera; Valeria Tonini
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-01-04

Review 2.  Effective teaching and feedback strategies in the or and beyond.

Authors:  Bradley J Champagne
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-12

3.  A little slower, but just as good: postgraduate year resident versus attending outcomes in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Samuel W Ross; Bindhu Oommen; Mimi Kim; Amanda L Walters; John M Green; B Todd Heniford; Vedra A Augenstein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The Presence of an Advanced Gastrointestinal (GI)/Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) Fellowship Program Does Not Impact Short-Term Patient Outcomes Following Fundoplication or Esophagomyotomy.

Authors:  Donald K Groves; Maria S Altieri; Brianne Sullivan; Jie Yang; Mark A Talamini; Aurora D Pryor
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Patients and hospital managers want laparoscopic simulation training to become mandatory before live operating: a multicentre qualitative study of stakeholder perceptions.

Authors:  Jessica Preshaw; Dimitrios Siassakos; Mark James; Timothy Draycott; Sanjay Vyas; Christy Burden
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2018-11-29

6.  Does resident experience affect outcomes in complex abdominal surgery? Pancreaticoduodenectomy as an example.

Authors:  Daniel M Relles; Richard A Burkhart; Michael J Pucci; Jocelyn Sendecki; Renee Tholey; Ross Drueding; Patricia K Sauter; Eugene P Kennedy; Jordan M Winter; Harish Lavu; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Resident involvement in laparoscopic procedures does not worsen clinical outcomes but may increase operative times and length of hospital stay.

Authors:  Jennifer Jolley; Daniel Lomelin; Anton Simorov; Carl Tadaki; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Patient outcomes following carotid endarterectomy are not adversely affected by surgical trainees' operative involvement: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Leo R Brown; Jamie Anderson; Vish Bhattacharya
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2019-01-21

9.  Postoperative Morbidity by Procedure and Patient Factors Influencing Major Complications Within 30 Days Following Shoulder Surgery.

Authors:  Edward Shields; James C Iannuzzi; Robert Thorsness; Katia Noyes; Ilya Voloshin
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2014-10-10

10.  Trainee performance in radical gastrectomy and its effect on outcomes.

Authors:  M Navidi; A Madhavan; S M Griffin; P Prasad; A Immanuel; N Hayes; A W Phillips
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-11-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.