Literature DB >> 35516821

'It is a different type of learning'. A survey-based study on how simulation educators see and construct observer roles.

Stephanie O'Regan1,2, Elizabeth Molloy3, Leonie Watterson1, Debra Nestel2.   

Abstract

Background: Simulation is reported as an appropriate replacement for a significant number of clinical hours in pregraduate programmes. To increase access for learners, educators have looked to understanding and improving learning in observer roles. Studies report equivalent learning outcomes and less stress in observer roles. However, reports on the prevalence, use and perceived value of observer roles from the educator's perspective are lacking.
Methods: An exploratory survey for Australian and New Zealand (ANZ) simulation educators based on literature findings was developed and piloted with a small sample (n=10) of like subjects for language, clarity, skip logic and completion time. The final survey comprised 36 questions. Quantitative data were analysed using Pearson's chi-squared test, Welch's ANOVA and exploratory factor analysis. Select qualitative data were analysed using content analysis and summarised with frequency counts and categorisation.
Results: Two hundred and sixty-seven surveys were completed, with 221 meeting criteria for analysis. The observer role is widely used in ANZ and most learners experience both hands-on and observer roles. The location of observers is dependent upon several factors including facility design, learner immersion, scenario design and observer involvement. Verbal briefings and/or other guides are provided to 89% of observers to direct their focus and 98% participate in the debrief. Educators value observer roles but tend to believe the best learning is hands-on. Conclusions: The learning in observer roles is less valued by educators than hands-on roles. Focused observation provides opportunities for noticing and attributing meaning, an essential skill for clinical practice. Learning spaces require consideration of scenario design and learning objectives. Scenario design should include objectives for observer roles and incorporate the observer into all phases of simulation. Attention to these areas will help promote the value of the different type of learning available in observer roles. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Simulation based education; Simulation based learning; Simulation faculty; Simulation in healthcare

Year:  2020        PMID: 35516821      PMCID: PMC8936736          DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn        ISSN: 2056-6697


  20 in total

Review 1.  How to interpret surveys in medical research: a practical approach.

Authors:  Colleen Y Colbert; Enrique Diaz-Guzman; John D Myers; Alejandro C Arroliga
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.321

2.  Likert scales, levels of measurement and the "laws" of statistics.

Authors:  Geoff Norman
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.853

3.  Enhancing Observers' Learning During Simulations.

Authors:  Gwen Leigh; Laura B Miller; Katherine B Ardoin
Journal:  J Contin Educ Nurs       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 1.224

4.  Tag team simulation: An innovative approach for promoting active engagement of participants and observers during group simulations.

Authors:  Tracy Levett-Jones; Patrea Andersen; Kerry Reid-Searl; Stephen Guinea; Margaret McAllister; Samuel Lapkin; Lorinda Palmer; Marian Niddrie
Journal:  Nurse Educ Pract       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 2.281

5.  Medical students' skills and needs for training in breaking bad news.

Authors:  Friedrich Stiefel; Céline Bourquin; Carine Layat; Sara Vadot; Raphael Bonvin; Alexandre Berney
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Simulation in healthcare: a taxonomy and a conceptual framework for instructional design and media selection.

Authors:  Gilles Chiniara; Gary Cole; Ken Brisbin; Dan Huffman; Betty Cragg; Mike Lamacchia; Dianne Norman
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 3.650

7.  Identifying Opportunities for Peer Learning: An Observational Study of Medical Students on Clinical Placements.

Authors:  Joanna H Tai; Benedict J Canny; Terry P Haines; Elizabeth K Molloy
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 2.414

8.  Vicarious learning during simulations: is it more effective than hands-on training?

Authors:  Karsten Stegmann; Florian Pilz; Matthias Siebeck; Frank Fischer
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.251

9.  A Mixed-methods Comparison of Participant and Observer Learner Roles in Simulation Education.

Authors:  Mark J Bullard; Anthony J Weekes; Randolph J Cordle; Sean M Fox; Catherine M Wares; Alan C Heffner; Lisa D Howley; Deborah Navedo
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2018-12-21

10.  The Association of Standardized Patient Educators (ASPE) Standards of Best Practice (SOBP).

Authors:  Karen L Lewis; Carrie A Bohnert; Wendy L Gammon; Henrike Hölzer; Lorraine Lyman; Cathy Smith; Tonya M Thompson; Amelia Wallace; Gayle Gliva-McConvey
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2017-06-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.