Literature DB >> 22989134

Vicarious learning during simulations: is it more effective than hands-on training?

Karsten Stegmann1, Florian Pilz, Matthias Siebeck, Frank Fischer.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Doctor-patient communication skills are often fostered by using simulations with standardised patients (SPs). The efficiency of such experiences is greater if student observers learn at least as much from the simulation as do students who actually interact with the patient.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate whether the type of simulation-based learning (learning by doing versus vicarious learning) and the order in which these activities are carried out (learning by doing → vicarious learning versus vicarious learning → learning by doing) have any effect on the acquisition of knowledge on effective doctor-patient communication strategies. In addition, we wished to examine the extent to which an observation script and a feedback formulation script affect knowledge acquisition in this domain.
METHODS: The sample consisted of 200 undergraduate medical students (126 female, 74 male). They participated in two separate simulation sessions, each of which was 30 minutes long and was followed by a collaborative peer feedback phase. Half of the students first performed (learning by doing) and then observed (vicarious learning) the simulation, and the other half participated in the reverse order. Knowledge of doctor-patient communication was measured before, between and after the simulations.
RESULTS: Vicarious learning led to greater knowledge of doctor-patient communication scores than learning by doing. The order in which vicarious learning was experienced had no influence. The inclusion of an observation script also enabled significantly greater learning in students to whom this script was given compared with students who were not supported in this way, but the presence of a feedback script had no effect.
CONCLUSIONS: Students appear to learn at least as much, if not more, about doctor-patient communication by observing their peers interact with SPs as they do from interacting with SPs themselves. Instructional support for observing simulations in the form of observation scripts facilitates both vicarious learning and learning by doing. An observation script may focus learners' attention on the important aspects of doctor-patient communication and increase the content-related accuracy of peer feedback. © Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22989134     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04344.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  17 in total

1.  Sequential learning of psychomotor and visuospatial skills for laparoscopic suturing and knot tying-a randomized controlled trial "The Shoebox Study" DRKS00008668.

Authors:  Felix Nickel; Jonathan D Hendrie; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Thomas Bruckner; Carly R Garrow; Maisha Mantel; Hannes G Kenngott; Philipp Romero; Lars Fischer; Beat P Müller-Stich
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  'It is a different type of learning'. A survey-based study on how simulation educators see and construct observer roles.

Authors:  Stephanie O'Regan; Elizabeth Molloy; Leonie Watterson; Debra Nestel
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2020-09-04

3.  An application of the caritative caring approach - nursing students' experiences of practising caring and uncaring encounters by simulation at a clinical training centre.

Authors:  Susanne Knutsson; Johanna Axelsson; Gunilla Lindqvist
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2022-12

4.  Improving patient safety through better teamwork: how effective are different methods of simulation debriefing? Protocol for a pragmatic, prospective and randomised study.

Authors:  Julia Freytag; Fabian Stroben; Wolf E Hautz; Dorothea Eisenmann; Juliane E Kämmer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Palliative care in the emergency department: an educational investigation and intervention.

Authors:  Jessica M Goldonowicz; Michael S Runyon; Mark J Bullard
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.234

6.  A Mixed-methods Comparison of Participant and Observer Learner Roles in Simulation Education.

Authors:  Mark J Bullard; Anthony J Weekes; Randolph J Cordle; Sean M Fox; Catherine M Wares; Alan C Heffner; Lisa D Howley; Deborah Navedo
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2018-12-21

7.  Towards a measurement of internalization of collaboration scripts in the medical context - results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Jan Kiesewetter; Martin Gluza; Matthias Holzer; Barbara Saravo; Laura Hammitzsch; Martin R Fischer
Journal:  GMS Z Med Ausbild       Date:  2015-08-17

8.  A simulated night shift in the emergency room increases students' self-efficacy independent of role taking over during simulation.

Authors:  Fabian Stroben; Therese Schröder; Katja A Dannenberg; Anke Thomas; Aristomenis Exadaktylos; Wolf E Hautz
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Sequential learning of psychomotor and visuospatial skills for laparoscopic suturing and knot tying - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial "The shoebox study".

Authors:  Jonathan D Hendrie; Felix Nickel; Thomas Bruckner; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Carly R Garrow; Maisha Mantel; Philipp Romero; Beat P Müller-Stich
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Observer roles that optimise learning in healthcare simulation education: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie O'Regan; Elizabeth Molloy; Leonie Watterson; Debra Nestel
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.