Literature DB >> 35508780

Projected environmental benefits of replacing beef with microbial protein.

Florian Humpenöder1, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky2,3, Isabelle Weindl2, Hermann Lotze-Campen2,4, Tomas Linder5, Alexander Popp2.   

Abstract

Ruminant meat provides valuable protein to humans, but livestock production has many negative environmental impacts, especially in terms of deforestation, greenhouse gas emissions, water use and eutrophication1. In addition to a dietary shift towards plant-based diets2, imitation products, including plant-based meat, cultured meat and fermentation-derived microbial protein (MP), have been proposed as means to reduce the externalities of livestock production3-7. Life cycle assessment (LCA) studies have estimated substantial environmental benefits of MP, produced in bioreactors using sugar as feedstock, especially compared to ruminant meat3,7. Here we present an analysis of MP as substitute for ruminant meat in forward-looking global land-use scenarios towards 2050. Our study complements LCA studies by estimating the environmental benefits of MP within a future socio-economic pathway. Our model projections show that substituting 20% of per-capita ruminant meat consumption with MP globally by 2050 (on a protein basis) offsets future increases in global pasture area, cutting annual deforestation and related CO2 emissions roughly in half, while also lowering methane emissions. However, further upscaling of MP, under the assumption of given consumer acceptance, results in a non-linear saturation effect on reduced deforestation and related CO2 emissions-an effect that cannot be captured with the method of static LCA.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35508780     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04629-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  23 in total

Review 1.  Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people.

Authors:  H Charles J Godfray; John R Beddington; Ian R Crute; Lawrence Haddad; David Lawrence; James F Muir; Jules Pretty; Sherman Robinson; Sandy M Thomas; Camilla Toulmin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Livestock production and the global environment: consume less or produce better?

Authors:  Henning Steinfeld; Pierre Gerber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers.

Authors:  J Poore; T Nemecek
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  An attributional life cycle assessment of microbial protein production: A case study on using hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria.

Authors:  Natasha Järviö; Netta-Leena Maljanen; Yumi Kobayashi; Toni Ryynänen; Hanna L Tuomisto
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 5.  Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems.

Authors:  Walter Willett; Johan Rockström; Brent Loken; Marco Springmann; Tim Lang; Sonja Vermeulen; Tara Garnett; David Tilman; Fabrice DeClerck; Amanda Wood; Malin Jonell; Michael Clark; Line J Gordon; Jessica Fanzo; Corinna Hawkes; Rami Zurayk; Juan A Rivera; Wim De Vries; Lindiwe Majele Sibanda; Ashkan Afshin; Abhishek Chaudhary; Mario Herrero; Rina Agustina; Francesco Branca; Anna Lartey; Shenggen Fan; Beatrice Crona; Elizabeth Fox; Victoria Bignet; Max Troell; Therese Lindahl; Sudhvir Singh; Sarah E Cornell; K Srinath Reddy; Sunita Narain; Sania Nishtar; Christopher J L Murray
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Microbes: Food for the Future.

Authors:  Matilde Ciani; Antonio Lippolis; Federico Fava; Liliana Rodolfi; Alberto Niccolai; Mario R Tredici
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-04-28

7.  Mycoprotein: The Future of Nutritious Nonmeat Protein, a Symposium Review.

Authors:  Tim J A Finnigan; Benjamin T Wall; Peter J Wilde; Francis B Stephens; Steve L Taylor; Marjorie R Freedman
Journal:  Curr Dev Nutr       Date:  2019-04-04

Review 8.  Plant-based and cell-based approaches to meat production.

Authors:  Natalie R Rubio; Ning Xiang; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  Bringing cultured meat to market: Technical, socio-political, and regulatory challenges in cellular agriculture.

Authors:  Neil Stephens; Lucy Di Silvio; Illtud Dunsford; Marianne Ellis; Abigail Glencross; Alexandra Sexton
Journal:  Trends Food Sci Technol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 12.563

Review 10.  Cellular agriculture in the UK: a review.

Authors:  Neil Stephens; Marianne Ellis
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2020-10-12
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Mycelium vs. Fruiting Bodies of Edible Fungi-A Comparison of Metabolites.

Authors:  Ralf G Berger; Sven Bordewick; Nina-Katharina Krahe; Franziska Ersoy
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-07-08

Review 2.  Fungal-Derived Mycoprotein and Health across the Lifespan: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Emma Derbyshire
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-22

3.  Environmental Impacts of Large-Scale Spirulina (Arthrospira platensis) Production in Hellisheidi Geothermal Park Iceland: Life Cycle Assessment.

Authors:  Asaf Tzachor; Asger Smidt-Jensen; Alfons Ramel; Margrét Geirsdóttir
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 3.727

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.