Literature DB >> 17471067

Superadditivity in multisensory integration: putting the computation in context.

Terrence R Stanford1, Barry E Stein.   

Abstract

Single-neuron studies have highlighted dramatic enhancements in neural activity consequent to multisensory integration. Most notable are 'superadditive' enhancements in which the multisensory response exceeds the sum of those evoked by the modality-specific stimulus components individually. Although all multisensory enhancements may have perceptual/behavioral consequences, superadditivity, which suggests a nonlinear combination of modality-specific influences, seems to have had a disproportionate influence within the multisensory literature. This influence has been reinforced by the increasing application of noninvasive techniques such as functional imaging and event-related potential recording, which depend on response nonlinearities to demonstrate underlying multisensory processes. In promoting the idea that many multisensory behaviors may not rely on superadditivity, we consider more recent single-neuron studies that place its incidence in context.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17471067     DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3280c1e315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  46 in total

1.  Incorporating cross-modal statistics in the development and maintenance of multisensory integration.

Authors:  Jinghong Xu; Liping Yu; Benjamin A Rowland; Terrence R Stanford; Barry E Stein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The development of audiovisual multisensory integration across childhood and early adolescence: a high-density electrical mapping study.

Authors:  Alice B Brandwein; John J Foxe; Natalie N Russo; Ted S Altschuler; Hilary Gomes; Sophie Molholm
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Multisensory Processing of Gustatory Stimuli.

Authors:  S A Simon; I E de Araujo; J R Stapleton; M A L Nicolelis
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.833

4.  Multisensory integration affects ERP components elicited by exogenous cues.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Rob H J Van der Lubbe; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli; Albert Postma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Spatial heterogeneity of cortical receptive fields and its impact on multisensory interactions.

Authors:  Brian N Carriere; David W Royal; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  TMS modulation of visual and auditory processing in the posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Nadia Bolognini; Carlo Miniussi; Silvia Savazzi; Emanuela Bricolo; Angelo Maravita
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Impact of response duration on multisensory integration.

Authors:  Dipanwita Ghose; Zachary P Barnett; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Capturing spatial attention with multisensory cues.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Cristy Ho; Charles Spence
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

9.  Auditory, somatosensory, and multisensory insular cortex in the rat.

Authors:  Krista M Rodgers; Alexander M Benison; Andrea Klein; Daniel S Barth
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Enhanced effectiveness in visuo-haptic object-selective brain regions with increasing stimulus salience.

Authors:  Sunah Kim; Thomas W James
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.