Literature DB >> 9180149

Family history and the risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

P D Pharoah1, N E Day, S Duffy, D F Easton, B A Ponder.   

Abstract

An increased risk of breast cancer in women with a family history of breast cancer has been demonstrated by many studies using a variety of study designs. However, the extent of this risk varies according to the nature of the family history (type of relative affected, age at which relative developed breast cancer and number of relatives affected) and may also vary according to age of the individual. The aim of our study was to identify all the published studies which have quantified the risk of breast cancer associated with a family history of the disease, and to summarise the evidence from these studies, with particular emphasis on age-specific risks according to subject and relative age. Seventy-four published studies were identified. The pooled estimate of relative risk (RR) associated with various family histories was as follows: any relative, RR = 1.9 (95% CI, 1.7-2.0); a first-degree relative, RR = 2.1 (CI = 2.0, 2.2); mother, RR = 2.0 (CI = 1.8, 2.1); sister, RR = 2.3 (CI = 2.1, 2.4); daughter, RR = 1.8 (CI = 1.6, 2.0); mother and sister, RR = 3.6 (CI = 2.5, 5.0); and a second-degree relative, RR = 1.5 (CI = 1.4, 1.6). Risks were increased in subjects under age 50 and when the relative had been diagnosed before age 50.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9180149     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19970529)71:5<800::aid-ijc18>3.0.co;2-b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  184 in total

1.  After BRCA1 and BRCA2-what next? Multifactorial segregation analyses of three-generation, population-based Australian families affected by female breast cancer.

Authors:  J Cui; A C Antoniou; G S Dite; M C Southey; D J Venter; D F Easton; G G Giles; M R McCredie; J L Hopper
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-12-27       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Genetic testing: a conceptual exploration.

Authors:  R L Zimmern
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Evaluating breast cancer risk projections for Hispanic women.

Authors:  Matthew P Banegas; Mitchell H Gail; Andrea LaCroix; Beti Thompson; Maria Elena Martinez; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Esther M John; F Allan Hubbell; Shagufta Yasmeen; Hormuzd A Katki
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Annual vs Biennial Screening: Diagnostic Accuracy Among Concurrent Cohorts Within the Ontario Breast Screening Program.

Authors:  Anna M Chiarelli; Kristina M Blackmore; Lucia Mirea; Susan J Done; Vicky Majpruz; Ashini Weerasinghe; Linda Rabeneck; Derek Muradali
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Performance Measures of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Plus Mammography in the High Risk Ontario Breast Screening Program.

Authors:  Anna M Chiarelli; Kristina M Blackmore; Derek Muradali; Susan J Done; Vicky Majpruz; Ashini Weerasinghe; Lucia Mirea; Andrea Eisen; Linda Rabeneck; Ellen Warner
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  The association between metabolic health, obesity phenotype and the risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Yong-Moon Mark Park; Alexandra J White; Hazel B Nichols; Katie M O'Brien; Clarice R Weinberg; Dale P Sandler
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  ChMP: A collaborative medical history portal.

Authors:  Noah H Zimmerman; Noah Zimmerman; Chirag Patel; David P Chen; David Pei-Ann Chen
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2008-11-06

8.  Impact of familial risk and mammography screening on prognostic indicators of breast disease among women from the Ontario site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry.

Authors:  Meghan J Walker; Lucia Mirea; Kristine Cooper; Mitra Nabavi; Gord Glendon; Irene L Andrulis; Julia A Knight; Frances P O'Malley; Anna M Chiarelli
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Predicting breast cancer risk: implications of a "weak" family history.

Authors:  Elaine Anderson; Jonathan Berg; Roger Black; Nicola Bradshaw; Joyce Campbell; Roseanne Cetnarskyj; Sarah Drummond; Rosemarie Davidson; Jacqueline Dunlop; Alison Fordyce; Barbara Gibbons; David Goudie; Helen Gregory; Kirstie Hanning; Susan Holloway; Mark Longmuir; Lorna McLeish; Vicky Murday; Zosia Miedzybrodska; Donna Nicholson; Pauline Pearson; Mary Porteous; Marta Reis; Sheila Slater; Karen Smith; Elizabeth Smyth; Lesley Snadden; Michael Steel; Diane Stirling; Cathy Watt; Catriona Whyte; Dorothy Young
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Causal attributions to epidemiological risk factors and their associations to later psychological adjustment among Japanese breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Shino Oba; Naoyoshi Takatsuka; Chisato Nagata; Yasuko Nagao; Satoru Yamamoto; Chiken Shibuya; Yoshitomo Kashiki; Hiroyuki Shimizu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.