Matthew F Buas1, Haiwei Gu2, Danijel Djukovic2, Jiangjiang Zhu2, Charles W Drescher1, Nicole Urban1, Daniel Raftery3, Christopher I Li4. 1. Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA. 2. Northwest Metabolomics Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. 3. Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA; Northwest Metabolomics Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. Electronic address: draftery@uw.edu. 4. Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA. Electronic address: cili@fredhutch.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Serous ovarian carcinoma (OC) represents a leading cause of cancer-related death among U.S. women. Non-invasive tools have recently emerged for discriminating benign from malignant ovarian masses, but evaluation remains ongoing, without widespread implementation. In the last decade, metabolomics has matured into a new avenue for cancer biomarker development. Here, we sought to identify novel plasma metabolite biomarkers to distinguish serous ovarian carcinoma and benign serous ovarian tumor. METHODS: Using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, we conducted global and targeted metabolite profiling of plasma isolated at the time of surgery from 50 serous OC cases and 50 serous benign controls. RESULTS: Global lipidomics analysis identified 34 metabolites (of 372 assessed) differing significantly (P<0.05) between cases and controls in both training and testing sets, with 17 candidates satisfying FDR q<0.05, and two reaching Bonferroni significance. Targeted profiling of ~150 aqueous metabolites identified a single amino acid, alanine, as differentially abundant (P<0.05). A multivariate classification model built using the top four lipid metabolites achieved an estimated AUC of 0.85 (SD=0.07) based on Monte Carlo cross validation. Evaluation of a hybrid model incorporating both CA125 and lipid metabolites was suggestive of increased classification accuracy (AUC=0.91, SD=0.05) relative to CA125 alone (AUC=0.87, SD=0.07), particularly at high fixed levels of sensitivity, without reaching significance. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide insight into metabolic changes potentially correlated with the presence of serous OC versus benign ovarian tumor and suggest that plasma metabolites may help differentiate these two conditions.
OBJECTIVE:Serous ovarian carcinoma (OC) represents a leading cause of cancer-related death among U.S. women. Non-invasive tools have recently emerged for discriminating benign from malignant ovarian masses, but evaluation remains ongoing, without widespread implementation. In the last decade, metabolomics has matured into a new avenue for cancer biomarker development. Here, we sought to identify novel plasma metabolite biomarkers to distinguish serous ovarian carcinoma and benign serous ovarian tumor. METHODS: Using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, we conducted global and targeted metabolite profiling of plasma isolated at the time of surgery from 50 serous OC cases and 50 serous benign controls. RESULTS: Global lipidomics analysis identified 34 metabolites (of 372 assessed) differing significantly (P<0.05) between cases and controls in both training and testing sets, with 17 candidates satisfying FDR q<0.05, and two reaching Bonferroni significance. Targeted profiling of ~150 aqueous metabolites identified a single amino acid, alanine, as differentially abundant (P<0.05). A multivariate classification model built using the top four lipid metabolites achieved an estimated AUC of 0.85 (SD=0.07) based on Monte Carlo cross validation. Evaluation of a hybrid model incorporating both CA125 and lipid metabolites was suggestive of increased classification accuracy (AUC=0.91, SD=0.05) relative to CA125 alone (AUC=0.87, SD=0.07), particularly at high fixed levels of sensitivity, without reaching significance. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide insight into metabolic changes potentially correlated with the presence of serous OC versus benign ovarian tumor and suggest that plasma metabolites may help differentiate these two conditions.
Authors: Mirjam J A Engelen; Henrike E Kos; Pax H B Willemse; Jan G Aalders; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Michael Schaapveld; Renee Otter; Ate G J van der Zee Journal: Cancer Date: 2006-02-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Teresa C Longoria; Frederick R Ueland; Zhen Zhang; Daniel W Chan; Alan Smith; Eric T Fung; Donald G Munroe; Robert E Bristow Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2013-09-18 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Nathalie Scholler; Meghan Crawford; Alicia Sato; Charles W Drescher; Kathy C O'Briant; Nancy Kiviat; Garnet L Anderson; Nicole Urban Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-04-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Vincent M Asiago; Leiddy Z Alvarado; Narasimhamurthy Shanaiah; G A Nagana Gowda; Kwadwo Owusu-Sarfo; Robert A Ballas; Daniel Raftery Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-10-19 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Richard G Moore; D Scott McMeekin; Amy K Brown; Paul DiSilvestro; M Craig Miller; W Jeffrey Allard; Walter Gajewski; Robert Kurman; Robert C Bast; Steven J Skates Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2008-10-12 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Arun Sreekumar; Laila M Poisson; Thekkelnaycke M Rajendiran; Amjad P Khan; Qi Cao; Jindan Yu; Bharathi Laxman; Rohit Mehra; Robert J Lonigro; Yong Li; Mukesh K Nyati; Aarif Ahsan; Shanker Kalyana-Sundaram; Bo Han; Xuhong Cao; Jaeman Byun; Gilbert S Omenn; Debashis Ghosh; Subramaniam Pennathur; Danny C Alexander; Alvin Berger; Jeffrey R Shuster; John T Wei; Sooryanarayana Varambally; Christopher Beecher; Arul M Chinnaiyan Journal: Nature Date: 2009-02-12 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Robert E Bristow; Alan Smith; Zhen Zhang; Daniel W Chan; Gillian Crutcher; Eric T Fung; Donald G Munroe Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Jialing Zhang; Wendong Yu; Seung Woo Ryu; John Lin; Gerardo Buentello; Robert Tibshirani; James Suliburk; Livia S Eberlin Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Li Chen; Shiqi Zhang; Xiaowei Sun; Joshua D McDonald; Richard S Bruno; Jiangjiang Zhu Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2021-03-15 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Elena Ioana Braicu; Silvia Darb-Esfahani; Wolfgang D Schmitt; Kaisa M Koistinen; Laura Heiskanen; Päivi Pöhö; Jan Budczies; Marc Kuhberg; Manfred Dietel; Christian Frezza; Carsten Denkert; Jalid Sehouli; Mika Hilvo Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-10-26