| Literature DB >> 35495447 |
Huaqiang Mo1,2, Chenxing Fu1,2, Zhiye Wu1,2, Peng Liu1,2, Zhibo Wen3, Qingqing Hong1,2, Yanbin Cai1,2, Gongxin Li1,2.
Abstract
Vulnerable plaques of atherosclerosis (AS) are the main culprit lesion for the serious risk of acute cardiovascular disease (CVD). Therefore, developing new non-invasive methods to detect vulnerable plaques and to evaluate their stability effectively is of great value in the early diagnosis of CVD. IL-6 plays a vital role in the development and rupture of AS. In this study, IL-6-targeted superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (Anti-IL-6-USPIO) are synthesized by a chemical condensation reaction. An AS model was established by damaging rabbit abdominal aortic intima with Foley's tube in combination with a high cholesterol diet. The results confirm that Anti-IL-6-USPIO have excellent IL-6-targeting ability and usefulness in detecting vulnerable plaques in vitro and in vivo, which may provide a novel, non-invasive strategy for evaluating acute cardiovascular risk or exploiting anti-atherosclerotic drugs. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35495447 PMCID: PMC9052309 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra10509c
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 3.361
Scheme 1Schematic illustration of Anti-IL-6-USPIO for targeted MR imaging of atherosclerotic vulnerable plaques in rabbits.
Fig. 1TEM images of NC-USPIO (A) and Anti-IL-6-USPIO (B), saturation magnetization curve (C) of NC-USPIO and Anti-IL-6-USPIO, T2 MR images of Anti-IL-6-USPIO with different concentrations (D), and the correlation between different concentrations and 1/T2 in Anti-IL-6-USPIO and NC-USPIO (E).
Fig. 2Prussian blue staining of macrophages incubated with LPS or without LPS for 24 h before various USPIOs were added (A), T2 MR images of induced macrophages incubated with various USPIOs for 12 h (B) and comparison of their rSIs (C), (1) to (6) are respectively Anti-IL-6-USPIO, NC-USPIO, competitive inhibiton, IgG-USPIO, Gd-DTPA and water, *P < 0.05 compared with Anti-IL-6-USPIO.
Fig. 3T 2-weighted images at pre (A), 24 h (B) and 48 h (C) post injection of Anti-IL-6-USPIO. HE staining (D) shows the pathological section of the layer with plaque.
Fig. 4T 2-weighted images after administration of Anti-IL-6-USPIO and NC-USPIO for 24 h (A1 and A3) and 48 h (A2 and A4) respectively, T1-weighted images after Gd-DTPA enhancement scan (A5) and T2-weighted images after plain scan (A6). Comparison of SNR in abdominal aortic walls 24 h and 48 h after injection of Anti-IL-6-USPIO and NC-USPIO in experimental group (B), *P < 0.01 vs. NC-USPIO group. Comparison of atherosclerotic and vulnerable plaques detection rate in three contrast agents respectively shows in left and right bars (C).