PURPOSE: To introduce a two-dimensional MR fingerprinting (MRF) technique for quantification of T1 , T2 , and M0 in myocardium. METHODS: An electrocardiograph-triggered MRF method is introduced for mapping myocardial T1 , T2 , and M0 during a single breath-hold in as short as four heartbeats. The pulse sequence uses variable flip angles, repetition times, inversion recovery times, and T2 preparation dephasing times. A dictionary of possible signal evolutions is simulated for each scan that incorporates the subject's unique variations in heart rate. Aspects of the sequence design were explored in simulations, and the accuracy and precision of cardiac MRF were assessed in a phantom study. In vivo imaging was performed at 3 Tesla in 11 volunteers to generate native parametric maps. RESULTS: T1 and T2 measurements from the proposed cardiac MRF sequence correlated well with standard spin echo measurements in the phantom study (R2 > 0.99). A Bland-Altman analysis revealed good agreement for myocardial T1 measurements between MRF and MOLLI (bias 1 ms, 95% limits of agreement -72 to 72 ms) and T2 measurements between MRF and T2 -prepared balanced steady-state free precession (bias, -2.6 ms; 95% limits of agreement, -8.5 to 3.3 ms). CONCLUSION: MRF can provide quantitative single slice T1 , T2 , and M0 maps in the heart within a single breath-hold. Magn Reson Med 77:1446-1458, 2017.
PURPOSE: To introduce a two-dimensional MR fingerprinting (MRF) technique for quantification of T1 , T2 , and M0 in myocardium. METHODS: An electrocardiograph-triggered MRF method is introduced for mapping myocardial T1 , T2 , and M0 during a single breath-hold in as short as four heartbeats. The pulse sequence uses variable flip angles, repetition times, inversion recovery times, and T2 preparation dephasing times. A dictionary of possible signal evolutions is simulated for each scan that incorporates the subject's unique variations in heart rate. Aspects of the sequence design were explored in simulations, and the accuracy and precision of cardiac MRF were assessed in a phantom study. In vivo imaging was performed at 3 Tesla in 11 volunteers to generate native parametric maps. RESULTS: T1 and T2 measurements from the proposed cardiac MRF sequence correlated well with standard spin echo measurements in the phantom study (R2 > 0.99). A Bland-Altman analysis revealed good agreement for myocardial T1 measurements between MRF and MOLLI (bias 1 ms, 95% limits of agreement -72 to 72 ms) and T2 measurements between MRF and T2 -prepared balanced steady-state free precession (bias, -2.6 ms; 95% limits of agreement, -8.5 to 3.3 ms). CONCLUSION: MRF can provide quantitative single slice T1 , T2 , and M0 maps in the heart within a single breath-hold. Magn Reson Med 77:1446-1458, 2017.
Authors: Marcelo Souto Nacif; Evrim B Turkbey; Neville Gai; Saman Nazarian; Rob J van der Geest; Radwa A Noureldin; Christopher T Sibley; Martin Ugander; Songtao Liu; Andrew E Arai; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-09-23 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Craig R Butler; AnaMaria Savu; Jeffrey A Bakal; Mustafa Toma; Richard Thompson; Kelvin Chow; Harris Wang; Daniel H Kim; Michael Mengel; Mark Haykowsky; Glen J Pearson; Padma Kaul; Ian Paterson Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2015-01-08 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Chul Hwan Park; Eui-Young Choi; Hyuck Moon Kwon; Bum Kee Hong; Byoung Kwon Lee; Young Won Yoon; Pil-Ki Min; Andreas Greiser; Mun Young Paek; Wei Yu; Yon Mi Sung; Sung Ho Hwang; Yoo Jin Hong; Tae Hoon Kim Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-06-14 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Stefan K Piechnik; Vanessa M Ferreira; Erica Dall'Armellina; Lowri E Cochlin; Andreas Greiser; Stefan Neubauer; Matthew D Robson Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2010-11-19 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Alois M Sprinkart; Julian A Luetkens; Frank Träber; Jonas Doerner; Jürgen Gieseke; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Georg Schmitz; Daniel Thomas; Rami Homsi; Wolfgang Block; Hans Schild; Claas P Naehle Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Dan Ma; Vikas Gulani; Nicole Seiberlich; Kecheng Liu; Jeffrey L Sunshine; Jeffrey L Duerk; Mark A Griswold Journal: Nature Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Peter Kellman; Joel R Wilson; Hui Xue; W Patricia Bandettini; Sujata M Shanbhag; Kirk M Druey; Martin Ugander; Andrew E Arai Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2012-09-11 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Yun Jiang; Dan Ma; Himanshu Bhat; Huihui Ye; Stephen F Cauley; Lawrence L Wald; Kawin Setsompop; Mark A Griswold Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-12-26 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Yong Chen; Ananya Panda; Shivani Pahwa; Jesse I Hamilton; Sara Dastmalchian; Debra F McGivney; Dan Ma; Joshua Batesole; Nicole Seiberlich; Mark A Griswold; Donna Plecha; Vikas Gulani Journal: Radiology Date: 2018-10-30 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Charlie Yi Wang; Simone Coppo; Bhairav Bipin Mehta; Nicole Seiberlich; Xin Yu; Mark Alan Griswold Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-10-30 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Zhengwei Zhou; Pei Han; Bill Zhou; Anthony G Christodoulou; Jaime L Shaw; Zixin Deng; Debiao Li Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 4.668