Literature DB >> 29308812

Using PEGylated magnetic nanoparticles to describe the EPR effect in tumor for predicting therapeutic efficacy of micelle drugs.

Ling Chen1, Fengchao Zang, Haoan Wu, Jianzhong Li, Jun Xie, Ming Ma, Ning Gu, Yu Zhang.   

Abstract

Micelle drugs based on a polymeric platform offer great advantages over liposomal drugs for tumor treatment. Although nearly all of the nanomedicines approved in the clinical use can passively target to the tumor tissues on the basis of an enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect, the nanodrugs have shown heterogenous responses in the patients. This phenomenon may be traced back to the EPR effect of tumor, which is extremely variable in the individuals from extensive studies. Nevertheless, there is a lack of experimental data describing the EPR effect and predicting its impact on therapeutic efficacy of nanoagents. Herein, we developed 32 nm magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (MION) as a T2-weighted contrast agent to describe the EPR effect of each tumor by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The MION were synthesized by a thermal decomposition method and modified with DSPE-PEG2000 for biological applications. The PEGylated MION (Fe3O4@PEG) exhibited high r2 of 571 mM-1 s-1 and saturation magnetization (Ms) of 94 emu g-1 Fe as well as long stability and favorable biocompatibility through the in vitro studies. The enhancement intensities of the tumor tissue from the MR images were quantitatively measured as TNR (Tumor/Normal tissue signal Ratio) values, which were correlated with the delay of tumor growth after intravenous administration of the PLA-PEG/PTX micelle drug. The results demonstrated that the group with the smallest TNR values (TNR < 0.5) displayed the best tumor inhibitory effect. In addition, there was a superior correlation between TNR value and relative tumor delay in individual mice. These analysis results indicated that the TNR value of the tumor region enhanced by Fe3O4@PEG (d = 32 nm) could be used to predict the therapeutic efficacy of the micelle drugs (d ≤ 32 nm) in a certain period of time. Fe3O4@PEG has a potential to serve as an ideal MRI contrast agent to visualize the EPR effect in patients for accurate medication guidance of micelle drugs in the future treatment of tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29308812     DOI: 10.1039/c7nr08319j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanoscale        ISSN: 2040-3364            Impact factor:   7.790


  11 in total

Review 1.  Radioresistance of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers and Therapeutic Perspectives.

Authors:  Mathieu Césaire; Juliette Montanari; Hubert Curcio; Delphine Lerouge; Radj Gervais; Pierre Demontrond; Jacques Balosso; François Chevalier
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 2.  The role of cell-penetrating peptides in potential anti-cancer therapy.

Authors:  Meiling Zhou; Xi Zou; Kexin Cheng; Suye Zhong; Yangzhou Su; Tao Wu; Yongguang Tao; Li Cong; Bin Yan; Yiqun Jiang
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2022-05

3.  IL-6-targeted ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for optimized MRI detection of atherosclerotic vulnerable plaques in rabbits.

Authors:  Huaqiang Mo; Chenxing Fu; Zhiye Wu; Peng Liu; Zhibo Wen; Qingqing Hong; Yanbin Cai; Gongxin Li
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.361

4.  Olaparib nanoparticles potentiated radiosensitization effects on lung cancer.

Authors:  Min Wu; Jing Liu; ChuanFei Hu; Dong Li; Juan Yang; ZhouXue Wu; LingLin Yang; Yue Chen; ShaoZhi Fu; JingBo Wu
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-12-11

5.  Nano-Delivery of a Novel Inhibitor of Polynucleotide Kinase/Phosphatase (PNKP) for Targeted Sensitization of Colorectal Cancer to Radiation-Induced DNA Damage.

Authors:  Sams M A Sadat; Melinda Wuest; Igor M Paiva; Sirazum Munira; Nasim Sarrami; Forughalsadat Sanaee; Xiaoyan Yang; Marco Paladino; Ziyad Binkhathlan; Feridoun Karimi-Busheri; Gary R Martin; Frank R Jirik; David Murray; Armin M Gamper; Dennis G Hall; Michael Weinfeld; Afsaneh Lavasanifar
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Size-dependent chemosensitization of doxorubicin-loaded polymeric nanoparticles for malignant glioma chemotherapy.

Authors:  Meng Gao; Yue Chen; Chenghu Wu
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.269

7.  Chelator-Free Copper-64-Incorporated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for PET/MR Imaging: Improved Radiocopper Stability and Cell Viability.

Authors:  Hye Min Jang; Myung Hwan Jung; Jae Sang Lee; Jun Sig Lee; In-Cheol Lim; Hyunsik Im; Sang Wook Kim; Sung-A Kang; Won-Je Cho; Jun Kue Park
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-14       Impact factor: 5.719

8.  Humanized bispecific antibody (mPEG × HER2) rapidly confers PEGylated nanoparticles tumor specificity for multimodality imaging in breast cancer.

Authors:  Yi-An Cheng; Tung-Ho Wu; Yun-Ming Wang; Tian-Lu Cheng; I-Ju Chen; Yun-Chi Lu; Kuo-Hsiang Chuang; Chih-Kuang Wang; Chiao-Yun Chen; Rui-An Lin; Huei-Jen Chen; Tzu-Yi Liao; En-Shuo Liu; Fang-Ming Chen
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 10.435

Review 9.  Micro/nano-bubble-assisted ultrasound to enhance the EPR effect and potential theranostic applications.

Authors:  Lei Duan; Li Yang; Juan Jin; Fang Yang; Dong Liu; Ke Hu; Qinxin Wang; Yuanbin Yue; Ning Gu
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 10.  Progress in cancer drug delivery based on AS1411 oriented nanomaterials.

Authors:  Xin Tong; Lu Ga; Jun Ai; Yong Wang
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 10.435

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.