N-Fused heteroaromatic frameworks are an essential structural moiety in several effective pharmacological compounds and natural products.[1] Among them, 1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-a]pyridines which are considered as a unique category of N-bridged 5,6-bicyclic compounds have received substantial consideration for either their potential utility as bioactive precursors or for other industrial applications.[2,3] For example, they exhibit several pharmaceutical behaviors including, mGlu modulation,[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-. J. Med. Chem.. 2012 ">4] PHD-1 inhibition,[5] PDE10 inhibition,[6] and acting as an antioxidant.[7] In addition examples of these compounds have been utilized as herbicidal agents[8] and for treatment of diabetes (type-II),[9,10] cardiovascular disorders,[11] and hyperproliferative disorders.[12] Besides, such derivatives have been included in a variety of pharmaceutically effective compounds as dipeptidomimetics[13] and have been employed as effective ligands for various transition metals.[14-16] As a consequence of the above-mentioned applications, several approaches for the triazolopyridine assembly have been established over the past decades. The reported synthetic strategies for assembling triazolopyridines could be classified into three approaches depending on the reactants: triazoles, pyridines, and multiple components. The oxidative cyclization of N-(2-pyridyl)amidines is amongst the most simple protocols for developing the 1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-a]pyridines that have been accomplished via employing oxidants including Pb(OAc)4,[17] NaClO/base[18] and MnO2.[19] Nonetheless, there are several drawbacks associated with these procedures such as restricted scopes, lower yields, lack of regioselectivity, and multi-step synthetic strategies. Moreover, Ueda and Nagasawa[20] developed a method for achieving 2-aryl-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-a]pyridines from a copper-catalyzed cyclization reaction of aryl nitriles and 2-aminopyridines. Similarly, Zhao et al.[21] described a Cu–Zn/Al–Ti reusable catalyst for the same conversion. Further, Jianguang and co-workers successfully synthesized triaryl[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyridine derivatives via copper-catalyzed radical cyclization reaction of benzylidenmalononitriles and azines.[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-. Tetrahedron. 2018 ">22] More recently, Xia et al. presented the preparation of triazolopyridines through the copper-catalyzed oxidative cyclization of amidines or 2-aminopyridines with several nitriles.[23] Notwithstanding, these reactions are followed by certain drawbacks, such as using the catalysts in higher loads (5–20 mol%) and not being recyclable or reusable. Moreover, these metal catalysts could be interacted conveniently with the obtained products, since [1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyridines are reported to be coordinated effectively with transition metals producing stable complexes.[24,25] Such challenges are of particular economic and environmental concerns, limiting the utility of such protocols in large-scale productions, and hence in industrial purposes. Furthermore, access to [1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyridines has also been documented for certain metal-free synthetic procedures. For instance, Alizadeh et al. reported the synthesis of [1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyridine derivatives via iodine-catalyzed one-pot four-component reaction comprising malononitrile, dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate, aromatic aldehydes, and benzylidenehydrazines.[26] Even though, this approach could be implemented only to alkynes with powerful electron-deficient moieties. Also, Zhao and co-workers[27] recorded a PIFA-mediated conversion of amidines into 2-substituted triazolopyridine derivatives. On the other hand, Chang et al.[28] published a method for the preparation of 1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-a]pyridine derivatives employing I2/KI as a catalyst. Ashish et al.[29] also recorded the contraction of 1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-a]pyridines through oxidative cyclization of trichloroisocyanuric acid and benzamidine derivatives. In addition to more reported protocols,[30] however, in one aspect or another, the above reported protocols acquire several disadvantages, including the utility of costly catalysts, a restricted substrates scope, lower regioselectivity, and the isolation of by-products. Consequently, the development of creative and generalized protocols to access these unique heterocyclic categories is still in demand. Following on with our reported works[31-33] herein we describe an alternative, more effective, and environmentally friendly metal-free approach for assembling 1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-a]pyridines from 1-amino-2-imino-4-aryl-1,2-dihydropyridine-3-carbonitrile precursors via the formation of C–N bonds employing the microwave irradiation as a sustainable energy source.
Results and discussion
The strategy utilized to construct 1-amino-2-imino-pyridine derivatives 3a–e includes two sequentially steps that start with the synthesis of enaminonitriles 2a–e, by reacting dimethylformamide dimethylacetal (DMF–DMA) with the respective ethylidenemalononitriles 1a–e (Scheme 1). Enaminonitrile derivatives (2a–e) could then be converted to their corresponding targets 3a–e through thermally mediated reaction with hydrazine hydrate in EtOH (Scheme 1).[33]
Scheme 1
Synthesis of 1-amino-2-imino-pyridines 3a–e.[33]
Our initial investigation commenced by the reaction of 1-amino-2-imino-pyridine derivative (3a) with acetic acid (as a solvent and reactant) at reflux for 3 h. Interestingly, the formation of the required product (5a) has been detected, albeit in a good yield of 74%, as a preliminary endeavor (Table 1, entry 1). Encouraged by the obtained results, the reaction conditions such as solvents, energy sources, and temperature have been evaluated to improve both reaction rate and yield (Table 1). Thereby, the reaction of 3a with acetic acid (1 equiv.) was investigated utilizing various solvents such as polar protic (EtOH, MeOH, and propanol), polar aprotic (CH3CN, and dioxane), and nonpolar (toluene) solvents at different times using various energy sources (heating, US, and MW irradiations). Unfortunately, none of them could afford the required product (Table 1, entries 2–13). Then the model reaction (Table 1) was also examined in 10.0 mL of ethanol comprising 5 equiv. of acetic acid to investigate its efficiency in the production of derivative 5a. Interestingly, compound 5a was crystalline out from the reaction mixture in 3 h of refluxing in 80% yield (Table 1, entry 14). Next, the molar ratio of acetic acid employed has also assessed. It was found that employing a mixture of ethanol/acetic acid (10 equiv.), not only improved the reaction yield to 85% but also provided a cleaner and lighter color product (Table 1, entry 15). Increasing the equivalents of acetic acid more than 10 equiv., neither improves the reaction rate nor the yield (Table 1, entry 16). Due to the versatility, efficiency, and selectivity of microwave irradiation, the model reaction (Scheme 1) was also investigated under the microwave irradiation conditions. The required product 5a was obtained in 89% in 25 min under microwave irradiation at 80 °C (Table 1, entry 17). On reducing the reaction duration to 15 min and increasing the temperature to 100 °C, the isolated yield was enhanced to be 92% (Table 1, entry 18). Increasing the temperature more than 100 °C did not improve the reaction (Table 1, entry 19). Thus, employing the model reaction (Table 1) using 3.0 mmol of derivative 3a in ethanol (10.0 mL) containing acetic acid (10 equiv.) and irradiation under microwave for 15 min at 100 °C has been identified as the optimal conditions (Table 1, entry 18). A reasonable reaction mechanism for the synthesis of 1,2,4-triazole derivative (5a) was described in Table 1, based on experimental evidences and our reported studies.[31-33] As outlined in Table 1, the transformation of the non-isolable intermediate (A) to the target compound (5a) occurred under metal-free conditions.
Optimization of the reaction condition between N-aminopyridine 3a and acetic acid 4aa
Entry
Solvent
Method
Time
Yield (%)
1
AcOH
Heating
3 h
74
2
EtOH
Heating
12 h
NRb
3
EtOH
MW
45 min
NR
4
MeOH
Heating
12 h
NR
5
MeOH
MW
45 min
NR
6
CH3CN
Heating
12 h
NR
7
CH3CN
MW
45 min
NR
8
Propanol
Heating
12 h
NR
9
Propanol
MW
45 min
NR
10
1,4-Dioxane
Heating
12 h
NR
11
1,4-Dioxane
MW
45 min
NR
12
Toluene
Heating
12 h
NR
13
Toluene
US
45 min (80 °C)
NR
14
EtOH/AcOH (5 equiv.)
Heating
3 h
80
15
EtOH/AcOH (10 equiv.)
Heating
3 h
85
16
EtOH/AcOH (15 equiv.)
Heating
3 h
85
17
EtOH/AcOH (10 equiv.)
MW
25 min (80 °C, 250 W)
89
18
EtOH/AcOH (10 equiv.)
MW
15 min (100 °C, 250 W)
92
19
EtOH/AcOH (10 equiv.)
MW
15 min (120 °C, 250 W)
92
Reaction conditions: a mixture of 1-amino-2(1H)-pyridine-2-imine derivatives (3a) (3.0 mmol) and acetic acid 4a (as reported) in solvent (10.0 mL) was heated or irradiated by microwave or ultrasound for the given time.
NR: no reaction.
Reaction conditions: a mixture of 1-amino-2(1H)-pyridine-2-imine derivatives (3a) (3.0 mmol) and acetic acid 4a (as reported) in solvent (10.0 mL) was heated or irradiated by microwave or ultrasound for the given time.NR: no reaction.Now, the limitations and scope of the aforesaid reaction have then investigated. Therefore the reaction of 1-amino-2(1H)-pyridine-2-imines (3a–d) with various carboxylic acid derivatives (4a–g, 10 equiv.) in EtOH (10.0 mL) was scrutinized under microwave irradiation. It was observed that these reactions did not proceed smoothly without using additives, as in the case of acetic acid. After several optimization trials, the optimal reaction condition for acids (4b–g) other than acetic acid was established to be 3.0 mmol of 1-amino-pyridine-2-imines 3a–d with 4.0 mmol of carboxylic acid derivatives (4b–g) in EtOH (10.0 mL) containing acetic acid (5 equiv.) as catalyst, under microwave irradiation (Table 2). It is worth mentioning that, the amount of acetic acid should not exceed 5 equiv., otherwise the reaction between 1-amino-pyridine-2-imines (3a–d) and acetic acid will have occurred. As displayed in Table 2, the summarized results demonstrate that all the proposed reactions yielded their corresponding products (5a–k) in outstanding isolated yields without detecting by-products. Also, all the reactions were effectively afforded the desired products regardless of the substitution pattern of the aromatic moiety (Ar, Table 2). Further, the influence of the R-groups on reaction efficiency was also been investigated (Table 2). In this regard, electron-donating and electron-deficient groups are both acceptable in the present process. For instance, the substrates comprising cyano groups (Table 2, entries 4–6) were easily converted to the corresponding products in excellent yields. Besides, the current protocol has shown a good tolerance for both aromatic and aliphatic carboxylic acids (Table 2).
Electronic effects of the substrates in the reaction
Entry
Ar
R
Products
Yielda (%)
1
C6H5
CH3
92b
2
p-ClC6H4
CH3
87b
3
p-ClC6H4
Cl–CH2
91c
4
C6H5
NC–CH2
96c
5
p-ClC6H4
NC–CH2
97c
6
p-MeOC6H4
NC–CH2
94c
7
p-MeOC6H4
93c
8
p-MeOC6H4
C6H5
83c
9
p-ClC6H4
C6H5
86c
10
p-ClC6H4
87c
11
p-ClC6H4
84c
Isolated yield.
Reaction conditions: a mixture of 1-amino-2(1H)-pyridine-2-imine derivatives (3a–d) (3.0 mmol) and acetic acid 4a (10 equiv.) in ethanol (10.0 mL) was charged in the glass tube of the microwave tube and irradiated at 100 °C for 15 min.
Reaction conditions: a mixture of 1-amino-2(1H)-pyridine-2-imine derivatives (3a–d) (3.0 mmol) and different carboxylic acids (4b–g) (4.0 mmol) in ethanol (10.0 mL), acetic acid (5 equiv.), was charged in the glass tube of the microwave tube and irradiated at 80 °C for 15 min.
Isolated yield.Reaction conditions: a mixture of 1-amino-2(1H)-pyridine-2-imine derivatives (3a–d) (3.0 mmol) and acetic acid 4a (10 equiv.) in ethanol (10.0 mL) was charged in the glass tube of the microwave tube and irradiated at 100 °C for 15 min.Reaction conditions: a mixture of 1-amino-2(1H)-pyridine-2-imine derivatives (3a–d) (3.0 mmol) and different carboxylic acids (4b–g) (4.0 mmol) in ethanol (10.0 mL), acetic acid (5 equiv.), was charged in the glass tube of the microwave tube and irradiated at 80 °C for 15 min.Moreover, the proposed approach could also be successfully applied for carboxylic acid esters. For example when the diethyl oxalate (3.0 mmol) allowed to react with N-amino-2-iminopyridines (3a–e, 3.0 mmol) using 5 equiv. of acetic acid in EtOH (10.0 mL) under microwave irradiation at 100 °C for 15 min, the desired products (5l–p) were received in excellent yields (85–93%, Scheme 2). In these cyclization reactions, both electron-deficient and electron-rich Ar groups are also applicable. The cyclization reaction of electron-rich bearing substrates and diethyl oxalate, proceeded smoothly to produce the corresponding products (5m and 5n) in good yields (87 and 85% yield, respectively, Scheme 2). Similarly, in comparison to the unsubstituted aromatic derivative (5l), electron-deficient derivatives provided the respective products (5o and 5p) in excellent yields (92 and 93% yield, respectively, Scheme 2, Fig. 1 and 2).
Scheme 2
Substrate scope for the reaction of 1-amino-2-imino-pyridine derivatives (3a–e) with diethyl oxalate.
Fig. 1
X-ray single crystal data determined for 5m.
Fig. 2
X-ray single crystal data determined for 5p.
Notably, 1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-a]pyridine-8-carbonitrile derivatives (5) could also be obtained through the cyclization reaction of derivatives 3c–d with either the corresponding aldehydes (6a–f) or with their arylidene malononitriles (7a–f) (Table 3, Fig. 3 and 4). These reactions were effectively performed with several aromatic aldehydes and their arylidenes comprising electron-withdrawing or electron-donating groups and afforded the corresponding products in comparable yields (Table 3). Also, aliphatic aldehydes such as chloroacetaldehyde yielded the targeted product in slightly lower yield in parallel to aromatic aldehydes (Table 3, entry 1). In comparison to carboxylic acids, the aldehydes or their arylidene malononitriles underwent the cyclization reaction at a fast rate with much more yields. Moreover, derivative 5t could be also obtained via refluxing of (E)-1-methyl-4-(2-nitrovinyl)benzene (8) with derivative 3d in CH3CN/DMF mixture (Scheme 3).
Reaction of 1-amino-2-imino-pyridine derivatives (3c–d) with aldehydes (6) and arylidene malononitriles (7)
Likewise, compounds 5d–f could be also acquired via the cyclization reaction of derivatives 3a,c,d with (E)-3-(piperidin-1-yl)acrylonitrile (9) or with (E)-3-(dimethylamino)acrylonitrile (10) in superb yield (Scheme 4). Besides, this active methylene derivatives 5d–f underwent condensation reaction either with DMF–DMA or benzaldehyde easily to afford the isolable enamines 11a,b and arylidenes 12a,b, respectively (Scheme 4).
Scheme 4
Alternative preparation of 5d–f and their reactions with DMF–DMA and PhCHO.
Further, the present approach was effectively applied also to isothiocyanate derivatives under moderate conditions. Thus, under microwave irradiation, 1,2-dihydropyridine-3-carbonitrile derivative (3d) underwent cyclization reaction when treated with phenyl isothiocyanate providing the unreported [1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyridine-8-carbonitrile derivative (5v) in excellent yield (90%) (Scheme 5). In the course of this reaction, the sulfur of the isothiocyanate moiety gets lost presumably in the form of hydrogen sulfide gas. Therefore, the reaction may be started by the nucleophilic addition of the amino group of derivative 3d onto azomethine motif of phenyl isothiocyanate. Then, hydrogen sulfide was removed, possibly via an addition–elimination reaction, which results in a [1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyridine ring formation (Scheme 5, Fig. 5). Moreover, by boiling pyridine derivatives (3a,b,d) in DMF or glyoxalic acid, the unsubstituted triazole derivatives (5w–y) have been achieved in superb yields (89–91%, Scheme 5). In the latter reactions, the aldehydic group might be involved in cyclization reaction followed by the loss of dimethylamine (in case of DMF) or carbon dioxide (in the case of glyoxalic acid).
Scheme 5
Reaction of 1-amino-2-imino-pyridine with PhNCS and DMF.
Fig. 5
X-ray single crystal data determined for 5v.
The aforesaid protocol also applied successfully for the bi-function aromatic aldehydic compounds. For example, the synthesis of bis-triazolopyridine derivatives (13a–c) was achieved through the cyclization reaction of the commercially available terephthalaldehyde with N-amino-2-imino-pyridine derivatives (3b,d,e) in 2 : 1 molar ratio (Scheme 6). Whereas, the mono-triazolopyridine derivative (5z), could be received on conducting the reaction between terephthalaldehyde and derivative 3d in 1 : 1 molar ratio (Scheme 6). Interestingly, the bis-derivative (13b) could be also synthesized via the reaction of the mono-derivative (5z), with another batch of 3d (1.0 mmol) (13b, Scheme 6).
Scheme 6
Reaction of 1-amino-2-imino-pyridines with terephthalaldehyde.
Ultimately, the nicotinonitrile derivative (14) was produced under microwave irradiation in excellent yield (98%, Scheme 7, Fig. 6) on boiling compound 3d in EtOH containing a catalytic amount of TEA (triethylamine) or DBU (1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene).
Scheme 7
Conversion 1-amino-2-imino-pyridine derivative (3d) to 2-aminopyridine derivative (14).
Fig. 6
X-ray single crystal data determined for 14.
The suggested structures of the synthesized mono- and bis-triazolopyridines have been verified based on several techniques of spectrometric analyses including 1H NMR and 13C NMR, in addition to the mass and accurate mass assignment. Moreover, the above structures were assured without any doubt through the X-ray single-crystal structure determination in some representative examples.
Conclusion
A microwave metal-free protocol towards the assembly of mono- and bis-[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyridines has been established from the cyclization reaction of 1-amino-2-imino-pyridine derivatives with readily available carboxylic acids and diesters. Moreover, the utility and versatility of the present procedure are also established for a diverse range of other substrates, such as mono-aldehydes, di-aldehydes, phenyl isothiocyanate, acrylonitriles, and glyoxalic acid. The essential strengths of the current procedure are operational efficiency, conveniently accessible substrates, inexpensive reagents, good to excellent yields, broad functional group tolerance, and chromatography-free procedure. Therefore, we believe that such an environmentally friendly strategy paves the way for the design of biologically important scaffolds and provides practical alternatives to the design of these hybrid molecules.
Experimental
General
Melting points were recorded on a Griffin melting point apparatus and are uncorrected. IR spectra were recorded using KBr disks using Jasco FT-IR-6300 spectrophotometer. 1H NMR (400 MHz) or (600 MHz) and 13C NMR (100 MHz) or (150 MHz) spectra were recorded at 25 °C using DMSO-d (or CDCl3) as a solvent with TMS as internal standard on a Bruker DPX 400 or 600 super-conducting NMR spectrometer. Chemical shifts are reported in ppm. Low-resolution electron impact mass spectra [MS (EI)] and high-resolution electron impact mass spectra [HRMS (EI)] were performed using a high-resolution GC-MS (DFS) thermo spectrometer at 70.1 eV and a magnetic sector mass analyzer. Follow up of the reactions and checking homogeneity of the prepared compounds was made by using thin-layer chromatography (TLC). Microwave heating was carried out with a single mode cavity Explorer Microwave synthesizer (CEM Corporation, NC, USA), producing continuous irradiation and equipped with simultaneous external air-cooling system. The X-ray crystal structures were determined by using a Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer and Bruker X8 Prospector and the collection of single-crystal data was made at room temperature by using Cu-Kα radiation. The structures were solved by using direct methods and expanded using Fourier techniques. The non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. The structures were solved and refined using the Bruker SHELXTL Software Package (Structure solution program-SHELXS-97 and Refinement program-SHELXL-97).[34] Data were corrected for the absorption effects using the multi-scan method (SADABS). The N-amino-2-iminopyridines 3a–e were prepared according to the literature procedure.[33]
General procedure for the preparation of 1-amino-2-imino-4-aryl-1,2-dihydropyridine-3-carbonitrile 3a–e[33]
A mixture of the enaminonitriles 2a–e (20.0 mmol) and hydrazine hydrate (1.5 mL, 30.0 mmol) in 60.0 mL of EtOH was stirred at reflux for 1 h. The mixture was concentrated in vacuo giving a solid that was crystallized from the appropriate solvent to give 3 as pure product.
General procedure for the preparation of triazolo[1,5-a]pyridine derivatives 5a–k
For acetic acid
Independent mixtures of 1-amino-2-imino-pyridine 3a,d (3.0 mmol), and acetic acid (10 equiv.) in EtOH (10 mL).
For other acids
Independent mixtures of 1-amino-2-imino-pyridine 3a–d (3.0 mmol), and the appropriate carboxylic acids (4a–g) (4.0 mmol), in EtOH (10.0 mL) containing acetic acid (0.90 g, 5 equiv.), were charged in the glass tube of the microwave tube and irradiated by focused microwave using a single-mode cavity explorer microwave synthesizer (CEM Corporation, NC, USA) for 15 min at 100 °C, and 250 W. The build-up of pressure in the closed reaction vessel was carefully monitored. After the irradiation, the reaction tube was cooled through an inbuilt system in the instrument until the temperature had fallen below 50 °C. The reaction was controlled by TLC and continued until the starting substrates were completely consumed. The solid products that formed on standing at room temperature were collected by filtration, washed with ethanol and recrystallized from the proper solvent (see below), to give 5a–k as pure products.
Method B for 5d–g
Independent mixtures of 1-amino-2-imino-pyridine (3.0 mmol), cyanoacetic acid or 4-nitrophenylacetic acid (3.0 mmol) in acetic anhydride (8.0 mL) were charged in the glass tube of the microwave tube and irradiated by focused microwave using a single-mode cavity explorer microwave synthesizer (CEM Corporation, NC, USA) for 5 min at 120 °C, the formed solid was collected by filtration and recrystallized from the appropriate solvent (see below).
General procedure for the preparation of triazolo[1,5-a]pyridine derivatives (5l–z and 11–14)
Independent mixtures of 1-amino-2-imino-pyridine 3a–e (3.0 mmol), and the appropriate reactant (3.0 mmol) in ethanol (10.0 mL) containing acetic acid (0.90 g, 5 equiv.), were charged in the glass tube of the microwave tube and irradiated by focused microwave using a single-mode cavity explorer microwave synthesizer (CEM Corporation, NC, USA) for 15 min at 100 °C, and 250 W. The build-up of pressure in the closed reaction vessel was carefully monitored. After the irradiation, the reaction tube was cooled through an inbuilt system in the instrument until the temperature had fallen below 50 °C. The reaction was controlled by TLC and continued until the starting substrates were completely consumed. The solid products that formed on standing at room temperature were collected by filtration, washed with ethanol and recrystallized from the proper solvent (see below), to give pure products. But in the case of 14 TEA or DBU was added instead of acetic acid.
Authors: Scott D Edmondson; Anthony Mastracchio; Robert J Mathvink; Jiafang He; Bart Harper; You-Jung Park; Maria Beconi; Jerry Di Salvo; George J Eiermann; Huaibing He; Barbara Leiting; Joseph F Leone; Dorothy A Levorse; Kathryn Lyons; Reshma A Patel; Sangita B Patel; Aleksandr Petrov; Giovanna Scapin; Jackie Shang; Ranabir Sinha Roy; Aaron Smith; Joseph K Wu; Shiyao Xu; Bing Zhu; Nancy A Thornberry; Ann E Weber Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2006-06-15 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Saleh Ahmed; Andrew Ayscough; Greg R Barker; Hannah E Canning; Richard Davenport; Robert Downham; David Harrison; Kerry Jenkins; Natasha Kinsella; David G Livermore; Susanne Wright; Anthony D Ivetac; Robert Skene; Steven J Wilkens; Natalie A Webster; Alan G Hendrick Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2017-06-24 Impact factor: 7.446