An efficient method has been developed for the synthesis of uniquely substituted pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridine and pyrido[1,2-b]indazole derivatives, which involves acetic acid and molecular oxygen promoted cross-dehydrogenative coupling reactions of respective β-ketoesters and β-diketones (like ethyl acetoacetate, ethyl benzoylacetate, methyl propionylacetate, acetylacetone, dimedone, 1,3-cyclohexanedione, and 1,3-cyclopentanedione) with N-amino-2-iminopyridines. The proposed tentative mechanism involves formal acetic acid-promoted oxidative C(sp3)-C(sp2) dehydrogenative coupling followed by dehydrative cyclization under a catalyst-free condition within high atom economy processes.
An efficient method has been developed for the synthesis of uniquely substituted pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridine and pyrido[1,2-b]indazole derivatives, which involves acetic acid and molecular oxygen promoted cross-dehydrogenative coupling reactions of respective β-ketoesters and β-diketones (like ethyl acetoacetate, ethyl benzoylacetate, methyl propionylacetate, acetylacetone, dimedone, 1,3-cyclohexanedione, and 1,3-cyclopentanedione) with N-amino-2-iminopyridines. The proposed tentative mechanism involves formal acetic acid-promoted oxidative C(sp3)-C(sp2) dehydrogenative coupling followed by dehydrative cyclization under a catalyst-free condition within high atom economy processes.
Fused nitrogencontaining
heterocyclic ring systems is a key structural
motif in many natural products and pharmaceutically active compounds.[1−3] As a result, these ring systems are often considered as important
backbones in the design of new drugs. Among fused N-heteroaromatic substances, those containing pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridine and pyrido[1,2-b]indazole ring
systems are medicinally important owing to their anti-viral,[4] -cancer,[5] -inflammatory,[6] -fungal,[7] and -tubercular
activities.[8,9] Moreover, the pyrazolopyridine ring system
is present in the known dopamine D3 agonist and D4 antagonist shown
in Figure .[5] Consequently, drugs containing this structural
framework have been developed for the treatment of many neurological
and central nervous system disorders like Parkinson’s disease,
schizophrenia, anxiety, unipolar major depression, and attention deficit
disorder.[10−12] In addition, substituted pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridines and pyrido[1,2-b]indazoles have been
observed to have potent antiherpetic[13] and
diuretic activities (Figure ).[14] Finally, several pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridine derivatives are known to be selective p38 inhibitors.[15]
Figure 1
Examples of biologically active pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridines and pyrido[1,2-b]indazoles.
Examples of biologically active pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridines and pyrido[1,2-b]indazoles.The elegant conceptual basis for and applications of cross-dehydrogenative
coupling (CDC) reactions has greatly expanded in recent years. As
a result, great progress has been made in developing new approaches
for forming different types of bonds that are difficult to construct
by using older classical methods.[16−25] The CDC concept has been employed to devise new strategies to construct
an assortment of bonds as part of sequences to generate complex organic
substances. An important example is C–C bond formation, which
can be carried out using intramolecular[26−29] or intermolecular[30−39] CDC reactions between two C–H bond bearing moieties. In addition,
CDC reactions have been developed for C–O,[40,41] C–N,[42−46] S–N,[47,48] C–S,[49,50] S-P,[51] and C–P[52,53] bond formation.In comparison with their traditional cross-coupling
counterparts,
cross-dehydrogenative coupling reactions are sustainable owing to
their green characteristics, including atom efficiency, step economy,
and lack of prefunctionalization.[54,55] C(sp2)–H–C(sp3)–H cross-dehydrogenative
coupling reactions are now among the most important methods for construction
of C–C bonds in a single step. However, the methods developed
for CDC to date usually require a catalyst to activate feebly reactive
C(sp3)–H bonds. The catalysts typically used for
this purpose include complexes of transition metals, like copper (Cu),[56] palladium (Pd),[57] gold (Au),[58] ruthenium (Ru),[23,59] iron (Fe),[60] iridium (Ir),,[61] vanadium (V),[62] and
cobalt (Co).[63] In addition, some of the
CDC processes are activated by nonmetal catalysts, such as iodine,[50,64] rose bengal,[65] 1,4-benzoquinone,[66] phenyliodonium diacetate,[67] and eosin.[68]In a continuation
of efforts aimed at developing methods for the
synthesis of novel fused N-heterocycles,[69−74] our recent attention became focused on members of the pharmaceutically
relevant pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridine and pyrido[1,2-b]indazole families. Particular attention was given to devising
novel aerobic, catalyst-free CDC processes that would produce these
targets in an efficient and atom economical manner. The investigation
described below demonstrates that simple cross-dehydrogenative coupling
reactions of N-amino-2-iminopyridine derivatives
with β-ketoesters and β-diketones, promoted by utilizing
the green oxidant molecular oxygen (O2) and the mild reagent
acetic acid, efficiently generate respective pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridines and pyrido[1,2-b]indazoles.
Results
and Discussion
The most commonly utilized synthetic protocol
to prepare pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridines involves intermolecular
[3 + 2] cycloaddition
of N-iminopyridinium ylides with alkenes or alkynes
as dipolarophiles (Scheme a).[75] Also, synthesis of these
substances has been accomplished via intramolecular cyclizations of
transient nitrenes[15b,76] and ethynylpyridines.[77,78] We envisaged that a novel and potentially more simple strategy for
synthesis of substituted pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridines
and related pyrido[1,2-b]indazoles would involve
cross-dehydrogenative coupling reactions between N-amino-2-iminopyridine derivatives and β-ketoesters and β-diketones
(Scheme b).
Scheme 1
Previous
(a) and Newly Developed (b) Routes for the Synthesis of
Substituted Pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridines
In an initial study designed to assess the viability of
this approach,
we explored the CDC reaction between N-aminopyridine 1a and ethyl acetoacetate (2a). We observed that
the reaction of 1-amino-2-imino-4-phenyl-1,2-dihydropyridine-3-carbonitrile
(1a) (3 mmol) and 2a (3 mmol) in refluxing
ethanol (10 mL) under an air atmosphere for up to 48 h leads to quantitative
recovery of the starting materials. Also, no reaction takes place
between 1a with 2a under the same conditions
when either Pd(OAc)2 (10 mol %) or Cu(OAc)2 is
present. A screening effort showed that no reaction occurs between 1a and 2a when various other solvents, including
acetonitrile, methanol, dioxane, propanol, H2O, and toluene,
are employed. Interestingly, when acetic acid or DMF is used as solvent
and Pd(OAc)2 (10 mol %) is employed as catalyst, reactions
do take place to form the respective triazolo[1,5-a]pyridine derivatives 3a (72%) and 3b (74%).
These substances presumably arise by reaction of the N-amino-2-iminopyridine 1a with either acetic acid or
DMF, Scheme .
Scheme 2
Reactions of N-aminopyridine 1a and
Ethyl acetoacetate (2a) in HOAc and DMF in the Presence
of Pd(OAc)2 To Form Triazolo[1,5-a]pyridines 3a and 3b, Respectively
Rewardingly, when acetic acid (0.36 g, 2 equiv) is present, the
reaction of 1a and 2a in ethanol under an
air atmosphere does take place to form the desired 7-amino-6-cyano-2-methyl-5-phenylpyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridine-3-carboxylic acid ethyl ester (4a, 34%) (Table ) (Table , entry 1). The structure
of 4a was assigned using spectroscopic methods and comparisons
of the data to those of related substances that are characterized
by using X-ray crystallographic analysis (see below). For example,
the 1H NMR spectrum of 4a contains resonances
corresponding to ethyl (1.32 ppm, t) and (4.30 ppm, q), CH3 (2.62 ppm, s), H-5 pyridine (7.20 ppm, s), NH2 (7.76 ppm, s), and phenyl [7.48–7.54 (3H, m) and 7.58–7.59
(2H, m)] moieties. Moreover, as anticipated for 4a, the 13C NMR spectrum contains 16 characteristic resonances and
the HRMS contains a mass peak at m/z 320.1268 associated with the molecular formula C18H16N4O2.
Table 1
Reaction
of N-aminopyridine 1a and Ethyl acetoacetate
(2a) in Ethanol Containing
Acetic Acid To Form Pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridine 4aa
entry
molar equiv.
acid
atmosphere
percent yield 4a
1
(HOAc) 2
air
34
2
(HOAc) 4
air
52
3
(HOAc) 6
air
74
4
(HOAc) 6
O2
94
5
(HOAc) 6
Ar
6
6
(p-TSA) 1
O2
39
7
(p-TSA) 2
O2
41
8
(TFA) 1
O2
48
9
(TFA) 2
O2
55
Reaction conditions: N-amino-2-imino-pyridine 1a (3 mmol), ethyl
acetoacetate
(2a) (3 mmol), in ethanol (10 mL), under an atmosphere
of air or O2 1 atm at 130 °C for 18 h.
Reaction conditions: N-amino-2-imino-pyridine 1a (3 mmol), ethyl
acetoacetate
(2a) (3 mmol), in ethanol (10 mL), under an atmosphere
of air or O2 1 atm at 130 °C for 18 h.Experiments were conducted to determine
the effect of acetic acid
loading on the efficiency of the 4a forming reaction
of 1a and 2a under an air atmosphere. The
results (Table , entries
2 and 3) show that increasing the loading of acetic acid from 2 to
4 to 6 equivalents leads to increases in the yield of 4a from 34 to 52 to 74%, respectively. Moreover, using higher amounts
of acetic acid (e. g., 8 equivalent) causes the process to become
complicated by competitive formation of triazolo[1,5-a]pyridine derivatives 3a. As a result, the maximum loading
of acetic acid was maintained at 6 equivalents to prevent the formation
of the undesired by-product (compound 3a). Importantly,
the reaction between 1a and 2a carried out
under molecular oxygen rather than an air atmosphere (1 atm) takes
place to form 4a in near quantitative yield (94%, Table , entry 4). As expected,
the yield of this process is significantly diminished (6%, Table , entry 5) when an
Ar atmosphere is utilized. This implies that the reaction is mostly
driven by oxygen, thus confirming the proposed oxidative CDC route.
Furthermore, utilizing a catalytic amount of strong Brønsted
acids like p-toluenesulfonic acid (p-TSA) or trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) was found to be less effective
under the optimal condition (Table , entries 6–9). It is worth mentioning that
increasing the loading of TFA above 2 equivalents leads also to a
side reaction between TFA and N-aminopyridine 1a.A study of the CDC reaction was conducted to explore
its substrate
scope. For this purpose, an assortment of N-amino-2-iminopyridines,
including 1a–f, and β-dicarbonyl compounds,
including ethyl acetoacetate (2a), ethyl benzoylacetate
(2b), methyl propionylacetate (2c), and
acetylacetone (2d) were subjected to the optimal reaction
conditions uncovered in the exploratory investigation (entry 4, Table ). The results (Table ) show that reactions
between 1a–f and 2a–d generate the corresponding pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridines 4a–v and that the presence
of either electron-withdrawing or electron-donating substituents on
the aryl moiety in the N-amino-2-iminopyridine substrate
does not have a remarkable effect on the course of the CDC process.
In addition, because of their crystalline nature, 4i and 4r were subjected to X-ray crystallographic analysis, the
results of which confirm their assigned structures (cf. Figures and 3).
Table 2
Acetic Acid-Promoted CDC Reactions
of N-Amino-2-iminopyridines 1a–f and β-Ketoesters/β-Diketones 2a–da
Reaction conditions: N-amino-2-iminopyridine 1a–f (3 mmol),
β-ketoesters/β-diketones 2a–d (3 mmol), in ethanol (10 mL) containing acetic acid (6 equiv),
under an O2 atmosphere (1 atm) at 130 °C for 18 h.
Figure 2
Plot of X-ray crystallographic data for 4i.
Figure 3
Plot of X-ray crystallographic data for 4r.
Plot of X-ray crystallographic data for 4i.Plot of X-ray crystallographic data for 4r.Reaction conditions: N-amino-2-iminopyridine 1a–f (3 mmol),
β-ketoesters/β-diketones 2a–d (3 mmol), in ethanol (10 mL) containing acetic acid (6 equiv),
under an O2 atmosphere (1 atm) at 130 °C for 18 h.The results of further studies
demonstrated that the CDC reaction
also occurs when cyclic 1,3-diketones are utilized as substrates.
For example, the reaction of N-amino-2-iminopyridine 1a and 5,5-dimethylcyclohexane-1,3-dione (dimedone, 5a) under the optimized reaction conditions described above
produces 7-aminotetrahydropyrido[1,2-b]indazole-8-carbonitrile
(6a) in 83% yield. The structure of 6a was
unambiguously assigned using spectrometric and X-ray crystallographic
analysis (Figure ).
Moreover, tetrahydropyrido[1,2-b]indazoles 6b–e are efficiently formed (79–87%)
in reactions of the respective N-aminopyridines 1b and 1d–f with dimedone
(5a), and analogous CDC reactions take place between
1,3-cyclohexanedione (5b) and N-amino-2-iminopyridines 1a, 1d, 1e, and 1f to form the corresponding
tetrahydropyrido[1,2-b]indazoles6f–j in high yields (80–90%) (Table ). The structures of two of these products, 6c and 6d, were assigned using X-ray crystallographic
methods (Figures and 6). Finally, N-amino-2-iminopyridines 1a and 1b react with 1,3-cyclopentanedione 7 and 3-oxo-3-phenylpropionitrile 9 under CDC
reaction conditions to form the corresponding 2,3-dihydrocyclopenta[3,4]pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridin-1-ones 8a and 8b (72
and 74% respective yields) and pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridine-3,6-dicarbonitrile 10 (Scheme ). Although the preparation of tetrahydropyrido[1,2-b]indazoles has been reported previously,[79] to the best of our knowledge, the CDC process developed in the current
effort is the first to generate these substances in a direct (single
step), versatile (large substrate scope), and environmentally friendly
manner.
Figure 4
Plot of X-ray crystallographic data for 6a.
Table 3
CDC Reaction of N-amino-2-iminopyridines 1a–f with
Cyclic β-Diketones 5a,ba
Reaction conditions: N-amino-2-iminopyridine 1a–f (3 mmol),
cyclic β-diketones 5a,b (3 mmol), in ethanol (10
mL) containing acetic acid (6 equiv), under an O2 atmosphere
(1 atm) at 130 °C for 18 h.
Figure 5
Plot of X-ray crystallographic data for 6c.
Figure 6
Plot of X-ray crystallographic data for 6d.
Scheme 3
CDC Reactions of N-amino-2-iminopyridines 1a and 1b with 1,3-Cyclopentanedione (7) and 3-Oxo-3-phenylpropionitrile 9
Plot of X-ray crystallographic data for 6a.Plot of X-ray crystallographic data for 6c.Plot of X-ray crystallographic data for 6d.Reaction conditions: N-amino-2-iminopyridine 1a–f (3 mmol),
cyclic β-diketones 5a,b (3 mmol), in ethanol (10
mL) containing acetic acid (6 equiv), under an O2 atmosphere
(1 atm) at 130 °C for 18 h.A plausible mechanistic pathway for the CDC coupling reactions[80] described above is illustrated in Scheme . In one possible route, proton
transfer from acetic acid activates N-amino-2-iminopyridine 1 for nucleophilic addition of the enol form of the β-dicarbonyl
substrates 2 or 5. The resulting adduct A then undergoes oxidative dehydrogenation via a reaction
with molecular oxygen to form intermediate B, which cyclizes
to generate C that loses water to produce the pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridine 4 or pyrido[1,2-b]indazole 6 product. In an alternative mechanistic route,
dehydration/cyclization of A precedes oxidative dehydrogenation.
Scheme 4
Plausible Mechanistic Pathway for the Formation of Pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridines 4 and Pyrido[1,2-b]indazoles 6
Conclusions
In summary, the investigation described above led to the development
of a unique CDC reaction between N-amino-2-iminopyridines
derivatives and 1,3-dicarbonylcompounds. The process, which takes
place under mild environmentally compatible conditions, is promoted
by the Bronstead acid catalyst AcOH and uses O2 as the
oxidant. Significantly, the new CDC reaction exhibits many features
required for classification as a green process, including high atom
economy, superior substrates scope, lack of toxic or harsh reagents,
and simple purification and work-up procedures. Owing to the frequent
occurrence of pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridine and pyrido[1,2-b]indazole ring systems in drugs, the new methodology could
have significance in the context of developing new pharmaceutically
active substances.
Experimental Section
General
Melting
points were recorded on a Griffin melting
point apparatus and are uncorrected. IR spectra were recorded using
KBr disks using a Jasco FT-IR-6300 spectrophotometer. 1H NMR (600 MHz) and 13C NMR (150 MHz) spectra were recorded
at 25 °C using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)-d6 as solvent with TMS as an internal standard on a Bruker DPX
600 superconducting NMR spectrometer. Chemical shifts are reported
in ppm. Low-resolution electron impact mass spectra [MS (EI)] and
high-resolution electron impact mass spectra [HRMS (EI)] were performed
using a high-resolution gas chromatography-MS (DFS) thermo-spectrometer
at 70.1 eV and a magnetic sector mass analyzer. Monitoring reactions
and checking the homogeneity of compounds were performed using thin
layer chromatography. X-ray crystal structures were determined using
a Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer and Bruker X8 Prospector, and
the collection of single crystal data was made at room temperature
by using Cu Kα radiation. The structures were solved by using
direct methods and expanded using Fourier techniques. The nonhydrogen
atoms were refined anisotropically. The structures were solved and
refined using the Bruker SHELXTL Software Package (Structure solution
program- SHELXS-97 and Refinement program- SHELXL-97).[81] Data were corrected for the absorption effects
using the multiscan method (SADABS). N-amino-2-iminopyridines 1a–f were prepared according to the literature
procedure.[75d,82]
General Procedure for the
Preparation of Pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridines 4a–v, 10, Pyrido[1,2-b]indazoles
6a–i and Cyclopenta[3,4]pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridin-1-one 8a,b
Independent solutions
of 1-amino-2-imino-pyridines 1a–f (3 mmol), and the 1,3-dicarbonylcompounds 2a–d, 5a,b, 7, or 3-oxo-3-phenylpropionitrile 9 (3 mmol), in ethanol (10 mL) containing acetic acid (1.08
g, 6 equiv) under an O2 atmosphere (1 atm) were stirred
at 130 °C for 18 h. Crystals formed upon cooling to room temperature
were collected by filtration and recrystallized from an appropriate
solvent to give pure pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridines 4a–v, 10, pyrido[1,2-b]indazoles 6a–i, and cyclopenta[3,4]pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridin-1-one 8a,b.