| Literature DB >> 35494338 |
Abstract
The COrona VIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is an ongoing global pandemic that has claimed millions of lives till date. Detecting COVID-19 and isolating affected patients at an early stage is crucial to contain its rapid spread. Although accurate, the primary viral test 'Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction' (RT-PCR) for COVID-19 diagnosis has an elaborate test kit, and the turnaround time is high. This has motivated the research community to develop CXR based automated COVID-19 diagnostic methodologies. However, COVID-19 being a novel disease, there is no annotated large-scale CXR dataset for this particular disease. To address the issue of limited data, we propose to exploit a large-scale CXR dataset collected in the pre-COVID era and train a deep neural network in a self-supervised fashion to extract CXR specific features. Further, we compute attention maps between the global and the local features of the backbone convolutional network while finetuning using a limited COVID-19 CXR dataset. We empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. We provide a thorough ablation study to understand the effect of each proposed component. Finally, we provide visualizations highlighting the critical patches instrumental to the predictive decision made by our model. These saliency maps are not only a stepping stone towards explainable AI but also aids radiologists in localizing the infected area.Entities:
Keywords: AI for COVID-19; COVID-19 detection from limited data; COVID-19 detection using CXR; Chest radiography; Deep learning; Self-supervised learning
Year: 2022 PMID: 35494338 PMCID: PMC9035620 DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108867
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Soft Comput ISSN: 1568-4946 Impact factor: 8.263
Fig. 1Illustration of our proposed framework for COVID-19 detection using limited chest X-ray images.
Fig. 2Illustration of the attention mechanism.
Summarized description of CXR dataset.
| Split | Normal | non-COVID Pneumonia | COVID-19 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacterial | Viral | ||||
| Train | 1079 | 2030 | 1076 | 1726 | 5911 |
| Validation | 270 | 508 | 269 | 432 | 1479 |
| Test | 234 | 242 | 148 | 200 | 824 |
Comparison of performance of the proposed method on chest X-ray dataset against state-of-the-art methods.
| Method | Class label | Precision | Recall | F1-Score | Specificity | NPV | Overall accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CoroNet | Normal | 0.9106 | 0.9145 | 0.9126 | 0.9644 | 0.9660 | 0.8932 (0.8701, 0.9135) |
| Pneumonia Bacterial | 0.8606 | 0.8926 | 0.8763 | 0.9399 | 0.9546 | ||
| Pneumonia Viral | 0.9220 | 0.8784 | 0.8997 | 0.9837 | 0.9736 | ||
| COVID-19 | 0.8934 | 0.8800 | 0.8866 | 0.9663 | 0.9617 | ||
| COVIDNet | Normal | 0.9156 | 0.9274 | 0.9214 | 0.9661 | 0.9710 | 0.9078 (0.8859, 0.9266) |
| Pneumonia Bacterial | 0.8840 | 0.9132 | 0.8984 | 0.9502 | 0.9634 | ||
| Pneumonia Viral | 0.9362 | 0.8919 | 0.9135 | 0.9867 | 0.9766 | ||
| COVID-19 | 0.9082 | 0.8900 | 0.8990 | 0.9712 | 0.9650 | ||
| Teacher Student Attention | Normal | 0.9274 | 0.9134 | 0.9203 | 0.9712 | 0.9711 | 0.9138 (0.8926, 0.9321) |
| Pneumonia Bacterial | 0.8889 | 0.9256 | 0.9069 | 0.9519 | 0.9685 | ||
| Pneumonia Viral | 0.9371 | 0.9054 | 0.9210 | 0.9867 | 0.9794 | ||
| COVID-19 | 0.9128 | 0.8900 | 0.9013 | 0.9728 | 0.9650 | ||
| MAG-SD | Normal | 0.9399 | 0.9359 | 0.9379 | 0.9763 | 0.9746 | 0.9235 (0.9032, 0.9408) |
| Pneumonia Bacterial | 0.9036 | 0.9298 | 0.9165 | 0.9588 | 0.9704 | ||
| Pneumonia Viral | 0.9375 | 0.9122 | 0.9247 | 0.9867 | 0.9809 | ||
| COVID-19 | 0.9192 | 0.9100 | 0.9146 | 0.9744 | 0.9712 | ||
| Proposed Method | Normal | ||||||
| Pneumonia Bacterial | |||||||
| Pneumonia Viral | |||||||
| COVID-19 | |||||||
Fig. 3Confusion Matrix: The horizontal axis and the vertical axis correspond to the ground truth labels and the predicted classes respectively.
Ablation studies to understand the impact of each training component.
| Training components | Class label | Performance metrics | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pretrained on | Self-supervised learning on CheXpert | Attention | Precision | Recall | F1 | Specificity | NPV | Overall accuracy | |
| No | No | No | Normal | 0.8628 | 0.8333 | 0.8478 | 0.9475 | 0.9348 | 0.8483 |
| Pneumonia Bacterial | 0.8772 | 0.8264 | 0.8511 | 0.9519 | 0.9295 | ||||
| Pneumonia Viral | 0.8217 | 0.8716 | 0.8459 | 0.9586 | 0.9715 | ||||
| COVID-19 | 0.8216 | 0.875 | 0.8474 | 0.9391 | 0.9591 | ||||
| Yes | No | No | Normal | 0.8811 | 0.8547 | 0.8676 | 0.9542 | 0.943 | 0.8786 |
| Pneumonia Bacterial | 0.897 | 0.8636 | 0.88 | 0.9588 | 0.9442 | ||||
| Pneumonia Viral | 0.8571 | 0.8919 | 0.8742 | 0.9675 | 0.9761 | ||||
| COVID-19 | 0.8714 | 0.915 | 0.8927 | 0.9567 | 0.9723 | ||||
| Yes | No | Yes | Normal | 0.8991 | 0.8761 | 0.8874 | 0.961 | 0.9513 | 0.8956 |
| Pneumonia Bacterial | 0.9056 | 0.8719 | 0.8884 | 0.9622 | 0.9475 | ||||
| Pneumonia Viral | 0.8671 | 0.9256 | 0.8954 | 0.9689 | 0.9835 | ||||
| COVID-19 | 0.9024 | 0.925 | 0.9136 | 0.9679 | 0.9758 | ||||
| No | Yes | No | Normal | 0.908 | 0.9274 | 0.9175 | 0.9627 | 0.9709 | 0.915 |
| Pneumonia Bacterial | 0.9177 | 0.9215 | 0.9196 | 0.9656 | 0.9673 | ||||
| Pneumonia Viral | 0.9241 | 0.9054 | 0.9147 | 0.9837 | 0.9794 | ||||
| COVID-19 | 0.9137 | 0.9 | 0.9068 | 0.9728 | 0.9681 | ||||
| No | Yes | Yes | Normal | 0.9163 | 0.9359 | 0.926 | 0.9661 | 0.9744 | 0.9345 |
| Pneumonia Bacterial | 0.9574 | 0.9298 | 0.9434 | 0.9828 | 0.9711 | ||||
| Pneumonia Viral | 0.9388 | 0.9324 | 0.9356 | 0.9867 | 0.9852 | ||||
| COVID-19 | 0.9261 | 0.94 | 0.9330 | 0.976 | 0.9807 | ||||
| Yes | Yes | No | Normal | 0.9212 | 0.9487 | 0.9347 | 0.9678 | 0.9794 | 0.9454 |
| Pneumonia Bacterial | |||||||||
| Pneumonia Viral | 0.9392 | ||||||||
| COVID-19 | 0.9495 | 0.9400 | 0.9447 | 0.9808 | |||||
| Yes | Yes | Yes | Normal | 0.9816 | |||||
| Pneumonia Bacterial | 0.9617 | 0.9339 | 0.9476 | 0.9845 | 0.9728 | ||||
| Pneumonia Viral | 0.9216 | 0.9369 | 0.9822 | ||||||
| COVID-19 | |||||||||
Fig. 4Visualization of different cases (Bacterial Pneumonia, Viral Pneumonia, and COVID-19) considered in this study and their associated critical factors in decision making by our proposed method. In each subfigure, the left figure presents the input to the model and its ground truth label; the right figure presents the predicted probabilities for each class and highlight the factors critical corresponding to the top predicted class. We have used jet colormap to colorize heatmap.