| Literature DB >> 35755067 |
Maya Pavlova1, Naomi Terhljan1, Audrey G Chung2,3, Andy Zhao1, Siddharth Surana4, Hossein Aboutalebi2,4, Hayden Gunraj1, Ali Sabri5,6, Amer Alaref7,8, Alexander Wong1,2,3.
Abstract
As the COVID-19 pandemic devastates globally, the use of chest X-ray (CXR) imaging as a complimentary screening strategy to RT-PCR testing continues to grow given its routine clinical use for respiratory complaint. As part of the COVID-Net open source initiative, we introduce COVID-Net CXR-2, an enhanced deep convolutional neural network design for COVID-19 detection from CXR images built using a greater quantity and diversity of patients than the original COVID-Net. We also introduce a new benchmark dataset composed of 19,203 CXR images from a multinational cohort of 16,656 patients from at least 51 countries, making it the largest, most diverse COVID-19 CXR dataset in open access form. The COVID-Net CXR-2 network achieves sensitivity and positive predictive value of 95.5 and 97.0%, respectively, and was audited in a transparent and responsible manner. Explainability-driven performance validation was used during auditing to gain deeper insights in its decision-making behavior and to ensure clinically relevant factors are leveraged for improving trust in its usage. Radiologist validation was also conducted, where select cases were reviewed and reported on by two board-certified radiologists with over 10 and 19 years of experience, respectively, and showed that the critical factors leveraged by COVID-Net CXR-2 are consistent with radiologist interpretations.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; chest X-ray; computer aided diagnosis; computer vision; deep neural networks
Year: 2022 PMID: 35755067 PMCID: PMC9226387 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.861680
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
Figure 1Example chest X-ray images from the benchmark dataset: (1) SARS-CoV-2 negative patient cases and (2) SARS-CoV-2 positive patient cases.
Figure 2Image-level distribution of benchmark dataset for SARS-CoV-2 negative and positive cases. (Left) Number of training images, (Right) number of test images.
Figure 3Patient distribution of benchmark dataset for SARS-CoV-2 negative and positive cases. (Left) Number of training patients, (Right) number of test patients.
Summary of demographic variables and imaging protocol variables of CXR data in the benchmark dataset. Age and sex statistics are expressed on a patient level, while imaging view statistics are expressed on an image level.
|
| ||
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| ||
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| ||
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Figure 4The proposed COVID-Net CXR-2 architecture design. The COVID-Net design exhibits high architectural diversity and sparse long-range connectivity, with macro and microarchitecture designs tailored specifically for the detection of COVID-19 from chest X-ray images. The network design leverages light-weight design patterns in the form of projection-replication-projection-expansion (PRPE) patterns to provide enhanced representational capabilities while maintaining low architectural and computational complexities.
Architectural and computational complexity of COVID-Net CXR-2 network in comparison to COVID-Net (14) and other state-of-the-art computer vision architectures. Best results highlighted in bold.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| InceptionResNetV2 ( | 54.34 | 35.4 |
| ResNet-50 ( | 24.97 | 17.75 |
| InceptionV3 ( | 21.81 | 15.32 |
| DenseNet201 ( | 18.33 | 19.82 |
| COVID-Net ( | 11.8 | 7.5 |
| COVID-Net CXR-2 |
|
|
Quantitative analysis. Sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), area under receiver operator curve (AUC), and accuracy of COVID-Net CXR-2 on the test data from the CXR benchmark dataset in comparison to COVID-Net (14) and other state-of-the-art computer vision architectures. Best results highlighted in bold.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| InceptionResNetV2 ( | 90.5 | 86.2 | 94.3 | 88.0 |
| ResNet-50 ( | 85.3 | 95.4 | 96.0 | 89.8 |
| InceptionV3 ( | 89.5 | 94.2 | 96.2 | 92.0 |
| DenseNet201 ( | 92.0 | 88.9 | 94.7 | 90.3 |
| COVID-Net ( | 93.5 |
| 99.2 | 94.0 |
| COVID-Net CXR-2 |
| 97.0 |
|
|
Confusion matrix of COVID-Net CXR-2 network.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Negative | 194 | 6 |
| Positive | 9 | 191 |
Figure 5Quantitative analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for COVID-Net CXR-2 SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative CXR classification, with a computed area under curve (AUC) of 99.41%.
Figure 6Examples of patient cases and the associated critical factors (highlighted in red) as identified by GSInquire (59) during explainability-driven performance validation as what drove the decision-making behavior of COVID-Net CXR-2. Radiologist analysis was conducted on (top-left) Case 1 and (top-right) Case 2. Radiologist validation showed that several of the critical factors identified are consistent with radiologist interpretation.