Literature DB >> 3549043

Prophylactic antiarrhythmic therapy of high-risk survivors of myocardial infarction: lower mortality at 1 month but not at 1 year.

S H Gottlieb, S C Achuff, E D Mellits, G Gerstenblith, K L Baughman, L Becker, N C Chandra, S Henley, J O Humphries, C Heck.   

Abstract

To determine whether prophylactic antiarrhythmic therapy influences mortality in high-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction, 143 such patients were randomized in a double-blind individually dose-adjusted, placebo-controlled trial an average of 14 +/- 7 days after myocardial infarction and followed for 1 year. Patients were judged to be at high risk on the basis of (1) ejection fraction less than 40% (n = 60), (2) arrhythmias of Lown class 3 or higher (n = 26), or (3) both (n = 57). Aprindine was chosen because of its long half-life, few side effects, and antiarrhythmic efficacy. Baseline characteristics in the treatment arms did not differ. Holter-detected arrhythmias were reduced in aprindine-treated patients at 3 months (p less than .001) and at 1 year (p less than .001). One patient was lost to follow-up; in the remaining patients 1 year mortality was 20% (28/142; 12 aprindine and 16 placebo). There was no significant difference between the two study arms in overall mortality and sudden death. However, among those who died, median duration of survival was longer in aprindine-treated patients (86 vs 21.5 days) (p = .04). Although antiarrhythmic treatment with aprindine of high-risk patients after myocardial infarction does not affect 1 year survival, mortality appears to be delayed; thus there may be a role for short-term treatment before more definitive therapy such as surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3549043     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.75.4.792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  6 in total

Review 1.  Antiarrhythmic drug classifications. A critical appraisal of their history, present status, and clinical relevance.

Authors:  S Nattel
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of antiarrhythmic drugs. Rationale and current status.

Authors:  R Latini; A P Maggioni; A Cavalli
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Assessment of the risk-benefit ratio for antiarrhythmic drug use.

Authors:  R W Campbell
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Programmed ventricular stimulation after myocardial infarction does not help reduce the risk of ventricular events.

Authors:  B Brembilla-Perrot; L Jacquemin; A Terrier de la Chaise; D Beurrier
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.727

5.  Spiral waves and reentry dynamics in an in vitro model of the healed infarct border zone.

Authors:  Marvin G Chang; Yibing Zhang; Connie Y Chang; Linmiao Xu; Roland Emokpae; Leslie Tung; Eduardo Marbán; M Roselle Abraham
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 6.  Arrhythmia prophylaxis after acute myocardial infarction: a decade of controversy.

Authors:  D C Harrison
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.727

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.