| Literature DB >> 35480841 |
Rajani Bhat1, Leanna L Foster2, Garima Rani3, Satyavani Vemparala4,5, Kenichi Kuroda1,2.
Abstract
Herein we report the synthesis of ternary statistical methacrylate copolymers comprising cationic ammonium (amino-ethyl methacrylate: AEMA), carboxylic acid (propanoic acid methacrylate: PAMA) and hydrophobic (ethyl methacrylate: EMA) side chain monomers, to study the functional role of anionic groups on their antimicrobial and hemolytic activities as well as the conformation of polymer chains. The hydrophobic monomer EMA was maintained at 40 mol% in all the polymers, with different percentages of cationic ammonium (AEMA) and anionic carboxylate (PAMA) side chains, resulting in different total net charge for the polymers. The antimicrobial and hemolytic activities of the copolymer were determined by the net charge of +3 or larger, suggesting that there was no distinct effect of the anionic carboxylate groups on the antimicrobial and hemolytic activities of the copolymers. However, the pH titration and atomic molecular dynamics simulations suggest that anionic groups may play a strong role in controlling the polymer conformation. This was achieved via formation of salt bridges between cationic and anionic groups, transiently crosslinking the polymer chain allowing dynamic switching between compact and extended conformations. These results suggest that inclusion of functional groups in general, other than the canonical hydrophobic and cationic groups in antimicrobial agents, may have broader implications in acquiring functional structures required for adequate antimicrobial activity. In order to explain the implications, we propose a molecular model in which formation of intra-chain, transient salt bridges, due to the presence of both anionic and cationic groups along the polymer, may function as "adhesives" which facilitate compact packing of the polymer chain to enable functional group interaction but without rigidly locking down the overall polymer structure, which may adversely affect their functional roles. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35480841 PMCID: PMC9034112 DOI: 10.1039/d1ra02730a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1Structures of monomer units in the cationic amphiphilic polymers with anionic groups.
Fig. 2Synthesis of propionate monomer from t-butyl-3-hydroxypropanoate.
Fig. 3Synthesis of ternary statistical copolymers. The statistical copolymers were prepared by free-radical polymerization in the presence of thiol chain transfer agent methyl 3-mercaptopropionate. The Boc and t-butyl groups were removed using trifluoroacetic acid at room temperature.
Composition and sequence of groups in the model polymers
| Model | DP | Monomer sequence (A: AEMA, P: PAMA, E: EMA) |
|---|---|---|
| M1 | 20 | A–E–P–A–E–P–E–A–E–P–E–A–A–E–A–E–A–A–E–P |
| M2 | 20 | A–E–A–A–E–P–E–A–E–P–E–A–A–E–P–E–A–P–E–A |
Please refer to Fig. 1 for structures of monomer units.
Characterization of ternary polymers
| Polymer | The average number of monomers/polymer chains | DP (NMR) |
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEMA | PAMA | EMA | ||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||
| AE00PA55E45 | 0.0 | 10.5 | 8.7 | 19.6 | 2770 | 4750 | 6800 | 1.43 |
| AE07PA47E46 | 1.2 | 7.1 | 7.0 | 15.3 | 2190 | 2860 | 3880 | 1.36 |
| AE21PA42E37 | 3.2 | 6.1 | 5.5 | 14.8 | 2130 | 2540 | 3690 | 1.45 |
| AE29PA27E44 | 5.1 | 4.7 | 7.3 | 17.1 | 2360 | 3210 | 3860 | 1.20 |
| AE37PA24E39 | 5.7 | 3.6 | 6.2 | 15.3 | 2140 | 2930 | 3770 | 1.29 |
| AE37PA22E41 | 5.7 | 3.3 | 6.3 | 15.4 | 2100 | 2820 | 5290 | 1.87 |
| AE39PA17E44 | 6.7 | 2.8 | 7.5 | 16.9 | 2290 | 3000 | 5100 | 1.70 |
| AE46PA12E42 | 8.5 | 2.3 | 7.8 | 18.6 | 2480 | 2250 | 3090 | 1.37 |
| AE59PA00E41 | 8.5 | 0.0 | 5.9 | 14.4 | 1900 | 2630 | 3500 | 1.33 |
The polymers are denoted as AEPAE where the numbers x, y, and z represent the average mole percentages of AEMA, PAMA, and EMA in the polymer chain determined by 1H NMR analysis, respectively.
M n (NMR) was calculated based on the monomer compositions and DP determined by 1H NMR analysis using the molecular weights of monomers and MMP. The molecular weight is based on the chemical formula of copolymer without TFA salt.
The Mn, Mw, and Đ were measured for the protected copolymers in THF solvent.
Antimicrobial and hemolytic activity of the ternary copolymers and their net charge
| Polymer | MIC (μg mL−1) | HC50 (μg mL−1) | Net charge | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Monomer composition | Corrected | ||
| AE0PA55E45 | >1000 | >1000 | n.d. | −10.5 | n.d. |
| AE7PA47E46 | >1000 | >1000 | >1000 (−0.7 ± 0.8%) | −5.9 | n.d. |
| AE21PA42E37 | >1000 | >1000 | >1000 (1.6 ± 1.1%) | −2.9 | −3.0 |
| AE29PA27E44 | >1000 | >1000 | >1000 (4.0 ± 1.7%) | +0.4 | +0.1 |
| AE37PA24E39 | 250 | >1000 | >1000 (3.7 ± 1.0%) | +2.1 | n.d. |
| AE37PA22E41 | 125 | >1000 | >1000 (14.1 ± 4.0%) | +2.4 | +2.0 |
| AE39PA17E44 | 31 | 500 | 740 ± 110 | +3.9 | +3.1 |
| AE46PA12E42 | 31 | 250 | 320 ± 130 | +6.2 | +3.4 |
| AE59PA0E41 | 31 | 125 | n.d. | +8.5 | +6.3 |
| AE34HE29E37 [ref. [ | 31 | 1000 | 1000 | +6.5 | n.d. |
Expected net charge of polymers in solution pH 7.4.
Net charge is reported as the difference in average number of monomers of AEMA and PAMA in a polymer chain determined by 1H NMR.
Corrected net charge calculated using equation based on the pKa values of AEMA and PAMA of the corresponding copolymer. The pKa values were determined by the titration curve of each copolymer (Fig. 4A and Table 4). “n.d.” indicates that titration curves were not obtained because of low solubility of polymers or low availability.
Fig. 4Antimicrobial and hemolytic activities activity of the copolymers. The MIC and HC50 values were plotted as a function of corrected net charges on the polymer. The MIC values for the polymers that measured above the highest polymer concentration used (>1000 μg mL−1) were denoted by (- -●- -). The values HC50 >1000 μg mL−1 were denoted by (- -▲- -).
Fig. 5(A) Representative potentiometric titration curves of copolymers AE21PA42E37 (○), AE29PA27E44 (▲), AE37PA22E41 (◆), AE46PA12E42 (■) and AE59PA0E41 (●) with NaOH (0.1 N) at 25 °C in 150 mM NaCl solution. (B) pKa values of PAMA (pKa1) (-■-) and AEMA (pKa2) (-●-) in the polymer side chains as a function of mole fraction of AEMA monomer relative to the total number of monomers defined as AEMA/(AEMA + PAMA).
pKa and net charges of selected copolymers. The titration was carried out in triplicate
| Polymers | p | p | Net charge | Corrected net charge | +/− ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AE21PA42E37 | 5.10 ± 0.16 | 8.70 ± 0.18 | −2.9 | −3.0 | 0.7 |
| AE29PA27E44 | 4.54 ± 0.06 | 8.59 ± 0.03 | +0.4 | +0.1 | 1.1 |
| AE37PA22E41 | 4.75 ± 0.03 | 8.49 ± 0.06 | +2.4 | +2.0 | 1.7 |
| AE39PA17E44 | 4.56 ± 0.06 | 8.31 ± 0.06 | +3.9 | +3.1 | 2.3 |
| AE46PA12E42 | 4.78 ± 0.04 | 7.98 ± 0.10 | +5.2 | +3.4 | 3.8 |
| AE59PA0E41 | — | 7.98 ± 0.02 | +8.5 | +6.3 | — |
Titration was measured at polymer concentration of 0.5 mg mL−1 due to low availability.
Fig. 6Polymer structure and conformations. (A) Chemical structure of EMA, AEMA and PAMA groups considered in the model polymers. The constituent functional groups of the polymer are illustrated as – hydrophobic (EMA, red); cationic (AEMA, green); anionic (PAMA, magenta). (B) Radius of gyration (Rg) for the model polymers (M1) as a function of simulation time. Representative snapshots to illustrate the conformations of the polymers are also presented, with arrows indicating the corresponding simulation time and Rg values. (C) Total electrostatic energy between the anionic PAMA groups and cationic AEMA groups is plotted as a function of time. (D) Time evolution of distance between the nitrogen atom of NH3+ in AEMA group (N1) and the carboxyl oxygen atoms of COO– (C20). A representative snapshot of the polymer is shown with arrows pointing to the corresponding distance between nitrogen (shown as green ball) and oxygen atoms (shown as magenta balls) and simulation time.
Fig. 7Salt bridge formation between C10 and cationic ammonium groups.
Fig. 8Multiple salt bridge formation.