| Literature DB >> 35474846 |
Maryam Farrukh1, Uzma Saleem1, Bashir Ahmad2, Zunera Chauhdary1, Ifat Alsharif3, Maria Manan1, Muhammad Qasim4, Reem Hasaballah Alhasani5, Ghulam Mujtaba Shah6,7, Muhammad Ajmal Shah8,7.
Abstract
Traditionally, Sarcococca saligna has been used for the treatment of arthritis and many other inflammatory disorders. The current study was planned to give scientific evidence to this traditional use of S. saligna. Phytochemical profiling of SSME was carried out by using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS). Complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA), 150 μL was injected in the subplantar region of the left hind paw to induce arthritis in rats. Aqueous methanolic extract of S. saligna (SSME) was administered orally at 250, 500, or 1000 mg/kg dose from the 7th day to the 28th day of the study to explore its anti-arthritic potential. Histopathological and radiographic assessment of joints and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analyses were performed. Determination of oxidative stress biomarkers in the serum was also carried out. ESI-MS/MS identified ten such phytoconstituents which have reported strong anti-inflammatory and anti-arthritic activity. The SSME extract considerably reduced paw inflammation and arthritic index, subdued cachexia, and significantly improved biochemical and hematological changes. Oxidative stress decreased in SSME administered rats dose-dependently. Histopathological and radiographic evaluations also showed the anti-arthritic activity of SSME, which was associated with the downregulation of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, nuclear factor (NF)-kB, COX-2, interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-1β and upregulation of I-kB, IL-4, and IL-10, in contrast to disease group rats. The outcomes of the study proposed that S. saligna have anti-arthritic potential, supporting its traditional use for rheumatoid arthritis treatment.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35474846 PMCID: PMC9026066 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c00619
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1ESI MS/MS spectrum of aqueous methanolic extract of S. saligna (SSME) in negative mode of ionization (mass range m/z 50–550).
Phytochemical Profiling of Aqueous Methanolic Extract of S. saligna (SSME) in Negative Mode of Ionization by ESI-MS/MS
| probable compound name | molecular formula | molecular mass (g/mol) | retention time (min) | observed
precursor ( | major
fragmentation
ms2 ( | pharmacological activities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threonic acid | C4H8O5 | 135.20 | 0.98 | 59, 71.08, 75, 87, 89, 98.92, 115, 117, 118.42, 135.08, 136.17, 161.08, 165.92 | 51.84, 59.01, 71, 73.02, 75, 87, 135, 91.05 | anti-arthritic activity,[ |
| Cinnamic acid | C9H8O2 | 147.16 | 1.22 | 57.17, 60.25, 71, 75, 85.08, 88.25, 101, 103, 115, 117.17, 129, 130.83, 147, 151.33 | 146.8, 103 | Antioxidant activity,[ |
| Caffeic acid | C9H8O4 | 179 | 1.72 | 71.08, 75.08, 81.08, 87, 89, 99, 112.50, 120.92, 124.92, 135.08, 143, 156.17, 161.08, 163.92, 179.08, 188.17 | 178.9, 134.9, 149.2, 179.2, 223, 135, 181.1, 161, 137, 135.1 | Anti-inflammatory activity,[ |
| Quercetin | C15H10O7 | 301.20 | 2.47 | 98.83, 99.42, 121, 122.58, 139, 151.08, 154.75, 183.08, 201.08, 213.17, 215.17, 239.08, 241.25, 247, 257.08, 265, 268.08, 283.25, 286.17, 301, 303.08 | 106.97, 120.97, 150.92, 178.9, 192.94, 256.9, 272.92, 300.97, 110.9, 121.3, 151.1, 149.3, 163.3, 179.3, 201.1, 229.1, 301, 273.5, 184.9, 284.8, 257 | antioxidant activity,[ |
| 5- | C16H18O8 | 337.20 | 2.93 | 112.92, 129, 157, 175, 205.08, 218.83, 244.92, 265.25, 277.08, 301.17, 319.17, 337.08, 339.17 | 163, 173.1, 275.3, 319, 337, 298.8, 173.1 | Antioxidant activity,[ |
| C9H8O3 | 164.16 | 6.88 | 57.08, 60.92, 70.92, 75, 82.92, 166.33, 87, 93, 101.08, 104.92, 116.92, 121, 129, 134.92, 147, 153, 164.92 | 117, 120.9, 163.5, 162 | Immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory
activity[ | |
| Pachyaximine | C24H41NO | 359.6 | 3.49 | 12.92, 153.25, 179.08, 187, 196.92, 209.08, 240.92, 255.17, 269.17, 297.17, 315.08, 323.25, 341.17, 359.25, 361.92 | 285, 447, 287.05, 288.05, 289.05 | Anti-inflammatory
activity,
antinociceptors[ |
| Kaempferol | C21H20O11 | 448.4 | 4.35 | 133.83, 153.08, 163, 177, 192.92, 207.08, 219.33, 236.67, 267.08, 285, 297.17, 315.17, 327.17, 341.17, 357.25, 386.92, 403.25, 411.25, 429, 447.17 | 447.09, 285.03, 448.09, 192.92, 284.03, 286.04, 133.9, 284.8, 257 | Anti-inflammatory activity[ |
| Ferulic acid | C10H10O4 | 194.18 | 7.26 | 129, 71, 75, 85, 97, 99, 110.92, 122.83, 147, 141, 159.08, 164.83, 177, 179.08, 195.08, 197 | 134.0, 178.02, 193.05, 149.05, 175.04, 135.03, 137.02 | Antioxidative and anti-inflammatory
activity[ |
| Quercitrin | C21H20O11 | 447.30 | 8.76 | 152, 177.08, 285.08, 315.17, 341.17, 403.25, 411.25, 429.25 | 300.02, 447.09, 301.03, 271.0, 243.03, 151.80 | Anti-inflammatory and anti-arthritic
activity[ |
Figure 2Effects of S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract on paw diameter of CFA-induced arthritic rats. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5) and analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-test.“a” and “b” show the statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) as compared to disease and standard group, respectively.
Figure 3Effects of S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract on body weight of CFA-induced arthritic rats. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5) and analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-test. “a” and “b” show the statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) as compared to disease and standard group, respectively.
Figure 4Effects of S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract on the arthritic index of CFA-induced arthritic rats. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5) and analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-test. “a” and “b” show the statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) as compared to disease and standard group, respectively.
Figure 5Effects of S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract on histopathological analysis of ankle joints in arthritic rats injected by complete Freund’s adjuvant at 40× and 20× magnification. (A) control; (B) disease; (C) rats treated with the standard drug; (D– F) paw histology of rats administered with aqueous methanolic extract at 250, 500, and 1000 mg/kg, respectively.
Figure 6Radiographic assessment of limbs of CFA-induced rats treated with aqueous methanolic extract of S. saligna (A) control; (B) disease; (C) rats treated with the standard drug diclofenac sodium; (D–F) rats treated with aqueous methanolic plant extract at 250, 500, and 1000 mg/kg, respectively.
Effects of Aqueous Methanolic Extract of S. saligna on Hematological and Biochemical Parameters in CFA-Induced Arthritic Ratsa
| parameters | control group | disease group | standard group | SSME (250 mg/dL) | SSME (500 mg/dL) | SSME (1000 mg/dL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hb (g/dL) | 13.02 ± 0.34a | 10.8 ± 0.51b | 13.94 ± 0.37a | 11.3 ± 0.2b | 12.6 ± 0.18a | 14.875 ± 0.42a |
| ESR (mm/first hour) | 9 ± 0.54a | 24.92 ± 0.55b | 15.8 ± 0.86a | 18.2 ± 0.25a | 7.8 ± 0.2a | 7.8 ± 0.66a |
| RBCs (×106/L) | 7.46 ± 0.49a | 4.55 ± 0.26b | 8.57 ± 0.38a | 5.274 ± 0.19b | 5.622 ± 0.33b | 8.18 ± 0.412832a |
| Eosinophil (%) | 3.2 ± 0.73a | 6.8 ± 0.37b | 3.4 ± 0.50a | 3.8 ± 0.37a | 3.4 ± 0.4a | 3.2 ± 0.58a |
| Platelets (×109/L) | 658.2 ± 2.83ab | 1876 ± 17.52b | 875.8 ± 15.81a | 1764.2 ± 45.55ab | 1568.6 ± 22.42ab | 1091.8 ± 21.74ab |
| AST (U/L) | 82.6 ± 0.87a | 211.6 ± 0.87b | 113.6 ± 0.81a | 129.6 ± 1.07ns | 121 ± 0.31ns | 115.8 ± 0.8a |
| ALP (U/L) | 226 ± 5.66ab | 414.8 ± 1.71b | 230.6 ± 13.13a | 318.6 ± 2.48ab | 291.4 ± 6.18a | 229.6 ± 4.37a |
| ALT (U/L) | 34 ± 1a | 57.2 ± 2.67b | 38 ± 1.87a | 47.8 ± 1.82ab | 41.2 ± 1.15a | 39.6 ± 1.50a |
| Urea (mg/dL) | 13 ± 0.44a | 29.8 ± 0.86b | 14.8 ± 0.37a | 17.8 ± 1.06b | 15.6 ± 0.24a | 14.8 ± 0.37a |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.584 ± 0.06ab | 1.93 ± 0.02b | 0.364 ± 0.02a | 0.834 ± 0.01b | 0.698 ± 0.05ab | 0.362 ± 0.02a |
| CRP(mg/L) | 5.8 ± 0.52a | 12.98 ± 0.36b | 4.32 ± 0.22a | 10.22 ± 0.66b | 7.88 ± 1.74a | 3.26 ± 0.27a |
| RF (IU/mL) | 15.76 ± 0.56a | 37.6 ± 3.04b | 22.4 ± 1.50a | 30.4 ± 1.43b | 28.6 ± 0.74a | 21 ± 1.81a |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 16.2 ± 0.37a | 2 9.9 ± 0.70b | 17.4 ± 0.24a | 26.2 ± 0.2ab | 18.6 ± 0.24a | 9.2 ± 0.2a |
Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5) and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test. “a” and “b” shows the statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) as compared to disease and standard group, respectively. Hb: hemoglobin; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; RBCs: red blood cells; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; ALP: alkaline phosphatase; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; CRP: C reactive protein; RF: rheumatoid factor; BUN: blood urea nitrogen; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; SSME: S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract.
Figure 7Effect of S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract on inflammatory mediators: BCl2, HSP-70, IL-6, and TNF-α. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5) and analyzed by Tukey’s multiple comparison post-test and two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s. “a” and “b” show the statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) as compared to disease and standard group, respectively. SSME, S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract.
Figure 8Effect of S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract on mRNA expression: NF-kB, COX-2, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-4, IL-10, and I-kB. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5) and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test. “a” and “b” shows statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) as compared to disease and standard group, respectively; SSME, S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract.
Figure 9Effect of S. saligna on oxidative stress biomarkers: SOD (superoxide dismutase), catalase, and MDA (malondialdehyde). Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5) and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. “a” and “b” show the statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) as compared to disease and standard group, respectively. SSME, S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract.
List of Primers Used in qRT-PCR
| biomarkers | forward/reverse | sequence | gene accession no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| COX-2 | Forward | 5-ATCAGGTCATCGGTGGACAG-3′ | S67722.1 |
| Reverse | 5-CTCGTCATCCCACTCAGGAT-3′ | ||
| NF-kB | Forward | 5-AAGATGTGGTGGAGGACTTG-3′ | NM_001276711.1 |
| Reverse | 5-GGTGGTTGATAAGGAGTGCT-3′ | ||
| IL-1β | Forward | 5-AGTCTGCACAGTTCCCCAAC-3′ | NM-031512.2 |
| Reverse | 5-GAGACCTGACTTGGCAGAGG-3′ | ||
| IL-6 | Forward | 5-TCACAGAAGGAGTGGCTAAG | M26744.1 |
| Reverse | 5-TCTGACCACAGTGAGGAATG-3′ | ||
| IL-10 | Forward | 5-CAGGTTGCTCCTTCCATGAT-3′ | L02926.1 |
| Reverse | 5-AACAATACGCCATTCCCAAG-3′ | ||
| 1-kβ | Forward | 5-GCAGGAGTGTTGGTGACTGA-3′ | NM-030867.2 |
| Reverse | 5-TAGCTGCAGCCTCCAATCTT-3′ | ||
| IL-4 | Forward | 5-AGCTATTGATGGGTCTCAGC-3′ | NM-201270.1 |
| Reverse | 5-TGACCTGGTTCAAAGTGTTG-3′ | ||
| TNF-α | Forward | 5-GGTGTCTTTACAGACCCGAAG-3 | X66539.1 |
| Reverse | 5-TCTACATAGTCAGCCAAACAGC-3 | ||
| GAPDH | Forward | 5-GCCTCCAAGGAGTAAGAAAC-3′ | AF106860.2 |
| Reverse | 5-GATGGTATTCGAGAGAAGGG-3′ |