Literature DB >> 35474846

Sarcococca saligna Hydroalcoholic Extract Ameliorates Arthritis in Complete Freund's Adjuvant-Induced Arthritic Rats via Modulation of Inflammatory Biomarkers and Suppression of Oxidative Stress Markers.

Maryam Farrukh1, Uzma Saleem1, Bashir Ahmad2, Zunera Chauhdary1, Ifat Alsharif3, Maria Manan1, Muhammad Qasim4, Reem Hasaballah Alhasani5, Ghulam Mujtaba Shah6,7, Muhammad Ajmal Shah8,7.   

Abstract

Traditionally, Sarcococca saligna has been used for the treatment of arthritis and many other inflammatory disorders. The current study was planned to give scientific evidence to this traditional use of S. saligna. Phytochemical profiling of SSME was carried out by using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS). Complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA), 150 μL was injected in the subplantar region of the left hind paw to induce arthritis in rats. Aqueous methanolic extract of S. saligna (SSME) was administered orally at 250, 500, or 1000 mg/kg dose from the 7th day to the 28th day of the study to explore its anti-arthritic potential. Histopathological and radiographic assessment of joints and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analyses were performed. Determination of oxidative stress biomarkers in the serum was also carried out. ESI-MS/MS identified ten such phytoconstituents which have reported strong anti-inflammatory and anti-arthritic activity. The SSME extract considerably reduced paw inflammation and arthritic index, subdued cachexia, and significantly improved biochemical and hematological changes. Oxidative stress decreased in SSME administered rats dose-dependently. Histopathological and radiographic evaluations also showed the anti-arthritic activity of SSME, which was associated with the downregulation of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, nuclear factor (NF)-kB, COX-2, interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-1β and upregulation of I-kB, IL-4, and IL-10, in contrast to disease group rats. The outcomes of the study proposed that S. saligna have anti-arthritic potential, supporting its traditional use for rheumatoid arthritis treatment.
© 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35474846      PMCID: PMC9026066          DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c00619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Omega        ISSN: 2470-1343


Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic autoimmune condition that leads to chronic inflammation of the synovium. This disease mainly disturbs various joints, especially little diarthrodial joints linked with big joints and their surrounding extra-articular tissues. All these little progressions eventually conclude in the clinical representation of disease in terms of pain, swelling, inflexibility in the joints of the knee and ankle, and difficulty in movement, due to modified bone structure at later disease stages.[1] Internationally, the prevalence of RA is about 2–4%. This disorder has dynamic epidemiology and ethnicity throughout the world. Females are discriminately more vulnerable to this disorder compared to males.[2] However, the definite etiology and associated risk factors accelerating the progression of RA are still elusive. RA is associated with a pathologically raised level of pro-inflammatory mediators like interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), cyclooxygenases (COX), and lipo-oxygenase, with decreased level cytokines IL-10 and IL-4.[3] Pro-inflammatory transcription factor, nuclear-factor-kappa B (NF-κB), principally participates in immunological reactions like swelling and cell propagation and markedly elevates in an RA patient’s serum.[4] It is evident from previous findings that free radicals and reactive oxygen species (ROS) are also linked with the development of this disorder.[5] RA is a chronic persistent disorder usually immedicable and treated symptomatically by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS). The use of these medicines is generally linked with apparent adverse effects like ulceration, hypertension, and stroke. Therefore, safe alternative, natural treatment strategies are an unmet clinical need these days. Despite the progressive development in medical sciences and technology of the modern era, the global demand for plant-based therapeutics is on the rise.[6] S. saligna is a member of the Buxaceae family; it is also called the sweet box or Christmas box, native to northern Pakistan.[7] Whole plants of S. saligna and its various aerial portions are conventionally utilized for a variety of medical problems.[8] In Pakistan, people use this plant for the treatment of hyperactive states of the gastrointestinal tract, syphilis, infections, fever, pain, liver diseases, inflammation, and rheumatism.[9] It is also used for the treatment of malaria and many dermatological diseases.[10] The leaves and twigs are simmered and applied in the form of a poultice on swollen joints or to relieve pain. The syrup is made from roots and used to treat gonorrhea.[11] Usually, the leaves of S. saligna are applied as an aperient, a blood cleanser, and to treat myalgia.[7] Some therapeutic effects of this plant also have been stated in previous literature, like cardiosuppressants, vasodilators, tracheal relaxants, antispasmodics, antidiarrheals, calcium antagonists, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, and many others.[12] Previous literature has reported the existence of multiple bioactive alkaloids, flavonoids, and polyphenolics. These bioactive compounds as preliminary constituents are responsible for the therapeutic potential. However, the S. saligna remedial activities against arthritis are not substantially reported. The current study was intended to investigate the mechanistic pathways targeted by S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract to mitigate arthritis caused by complete Freund adjuvant (CFA) in the rodent model.

Results

Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry (ESI/MS/MS) of S. saligna Aqueous Methanolic Extract

The SSME was run in the fusion mixture of chloroform and methanol in a 1:1 percentage. Sample injection was directly inserted. The complete picture information by using the negative mode of ionization is shown in Figure . Ten phytochemical compounds were detected in negative ion mode. These identified compounds were then arranged in the mass spectra of high resolution based on their accurate masses and isotopic arrangement. Then, search outcomes were confirmed further based on their MS/MS patterns. In the meantime, the MS/MS arrays were explored in suitable ESI mass spectral data libraries like Pub Chem MS library, NIST MS library, and human metabolome database (HMDB) along with the comparison with accessible literature data (Figure , Table ).
Figure 1

ESI MS/MS spectrum of aqueous methanolic extract of S. saligna (SSME) in negative mode of ionization (mass range m/z 50–550).

Table 1

Phytochemical Profiling of Aqueous Methanolic Extract of S. saligna (SSME) in Negative Mode of Ionization by ESI-MS/MS

probable compound namemolecular formulamolecular mass (g/mol)retention time (min)observed precursor (m/z)major fragmentation ms2 (m/z)pharmacological activities
Threonic acidC4H8O5135.200.9859, 71.08, 75, 87, 89, 98.92, 115, 117, 118.42, 135.08, 136.17, 161.08, 165.9251.84, 59.01, 71, 73.02, 75, 87, 135, 91.05anti-arthritic activity,[13] helps in early diagnosis of arthritis[14]
Cinnamic acidC9H8O2147.161.2257.17, 60.25, 71, 75, 85.08, 88.25, 101, 103, 115, 117.17, 129, 130.83, 147, 151.33146.8, 103Antioxidant activity,[15] anti-arthritic activity[16]
Caffeic acidC9H8O41791.7271.08, 75.08, 81.08, 87, 89, 99, 112.50, 120.92, 124.92, 135.08, 143, 156.17, 161.08, 163.92, 179.08, 188.17178.9, 134.9, 149.2, 179.2, 223, 135, 181.1, 161, 137, 135.1Anti-inflammatory activity,[17] antioxidant activity[18]
QuercetinC15H10O7301.202.4798.83, 99.42, 121, 122.58, 139, 151.08, 154.75, 183.08, 201.08, 213.17, 215.17, 239.08, 241.25, 247, 257.08, 265, 268.08, 283.25, 286.17, 301, 303.08106.97, 120.97, 150.92, 178.9, 192.94, 256.9, 272.92, 300.97, 110.9, 121.3, 151.1, 149.3, 163.3, 179.3, 201.1, 229.1, 301, 273.5, 184.9, 284.8, 257antioxidant activity,[19] anti-inflammatory activity,[20] anti-arthritic activity[21]
5-p-coumaroyl quinic acidC16H18O8337.202.93112.92, 129, 157, 175, 205.08, 218.83, 244.92, 265.25, 277.08, 301.17, 319.17, 337.08, 339.17163, 173.1, 275.3, 319, 337, 298.8, 173.1Antioxidant activity,[22] anti-inflammatory activity[23]
p-Coumaric acidC9H8O3164.166.8857.08, 60.92, 70.92, 75, 82.92, 166.33, 87, 93, 101.08, 104.92, 116.92, 121, 129, 134.92, 147, 153, 164.92117, 120.9, 163.5, 162Immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory activity[24]
PachyaximineC24H41NO359.63.4912.92, 153.25, 179.08, 187, 196.92, 209.08, 240.92, 255.17, 269.17, 297.17, 315.08, 323.25, 341.17, 359.25, 361.92285, 447, 287.05, 288.05, 289.05Anti-inflammatory activity, antinociceptors[25]
KaempferolC21H20O11448.44.35133.83, 153.08, 163, 177, 192.92, 207.08, 219.33, 236.67, 267.08, 285, 297.17, 315.17, 327.17, 341.17, 357.25, 386.92, 403.25, 411.25, 429, 447.17447.09, 285.03, 448.09, 192.92, 284.03, 286.04, 133.9, 284.8, 257Anti-inflammatory activity[26]
Ferulic acidC10H10O4194.187.26129, 71, 75, 85, 97, 99, 110.92, 122.83, 147, 141, 159.08, 164.83, 177, 179.08, 195.08, 197134.0, 178.02, 193.05, 149.05, 175.04, 135.03, 137.02Antioxidative and anti-inflammatory activity[27]
QuercitrinC21H20O11447.308.76152, 177.08, 285.08, 315.17, 341.17, 403.25, 411.25, 429.25300.02, 447.09, 301.03, 271.0, 243.03, 151.80Anti-inflammatory and anti-arthritic activity[28]
ESI MS/MS spectrum of aqueous methanolic extract of S. saligna (SSME) in negative mode of ionization (mass range m/z 50–550).

In Vivo Evaluation of Anti-Arthritic Potential of SSME

Determination of Inflammation of Paw

Injection of the inducing agent in the subplantar region produced marked inflammation after 1 week. Paw volume and swelling in the disease group were persistently increased from day 8 to day 28. Treatment with aqueous methanolic extract of plant significantly decreased (p < 0.001) paw inflammation in rats in contrast to rats of the disease group. The best results were obtained with a 1000 mg/kg dose (Figure ).
Figure 2

Effects of S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract on paw diameter of CFA-induced arthritic rats. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5) and analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-test.“a” and “b” show the statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) as compared to disease and standard group, respectively.

Effects of S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract on paw diameter of CFA-induced arthritic rats. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5) and analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-test.“a” and “b” show the statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) as compared to disease and standard group, respectively.

Determination of Body Weight

The decline in the values was determined to be caused by inflammation in the disease group from the first week until the fourth week, while SSME extract (dose-dependently) and diclofenac sodium considerably (p < 0.001) restored the weight of animals (Figure ).
Figure 3

Effects of S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract on body weight of CFA-induced arthritic rats. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5) and analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-test. “a” and “b” show the statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) as compared to disease and standard group, respectively.

Effects of S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract on body weight of CFA-induced arthritic rats. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5) and analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-test. “a” and “b” show the statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) as compared to disease and standard group, respectively.

Arthritic Index

In the control group, swelling or inflammatory symptoms were not observed, while the consistent increase in the arthritic index in the disease group was noted (Figure ). Administration of SSME and diclofenac sodium markedly (p < 0.001) reduced the values of the arthritic index in contrast to disease group animals. The highest value of arthritic index was observed on day 28 in disease group animals (5.80 ± 0.20), with decreased value by SSME at dose of 1000 mg/kg (1.00 ± 0.00), 500 mg/kg (1.20 ± 0.20), and 250 mg/kg (1.80 ± 0.20) and diclofenac sodium (2.20 ± 0.20) treatments.
Figure 4

Effects of S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract on the arthritic index of CFA-induced arthritic rats. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5) and analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-test. “a” and “b” show the statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) as compared to disease and standard group, respectively.

Effects of S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract on the arthritic index of CFA-induced arthritic rats. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5) and analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-test. “a” and “b” show the statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) as compared to disease and standard group, respectively.

Histopathological Evaluation of Joints

Histopathological assessment of joints revealed the significant pannus development and hyperplasia of synovial space. Cartilage annihilation, migration of inflammatory cells, and attrition of bones in disease group rats were noted compared to control group animals. SSME (250, 500, and 1000 mg/kg) treatment mitigated the pathological changes like pannus development, migration, or undefined movement of inflammatory cells, hyperplasia of synovial space, and erosion of bones compared with disease group animals (Figure ). The effect of the highest dose of SSME (1000 mg/kg) on bone destruction, pannus development, and paw inflammation was comparable with diclofenac sodium.
Figure 5

Effects of S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract on histopathological analysis of ankle joints in arthritic rats injected by complete Freund’s adjuvant at 40× and 20× magnification. (A) control; (B) disease; (C) rats treated with the standard drug; (D– F) paw histology of rats administered with aqueous methanolic extract at 250, 500, and 1000 mg/kg, respectively.

Effects of S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract on histopathological analysis of ankle joints in arthritic rats injected by complete Freund’s adjuvant at 40× and 20× magnification. (A) control; (B) disease; (C) rats treated with the standard drug; (D– F) paw histology of rats administered with aqueous methanolic extract at 250, 500, and 1000 mg/kg, respectively.

Radiographic Findings

Radiographic examination (Figure ) showed severe soft tissue swelling, obvious joint space congestion, stiffened connective tissue, rigorous bone attrition, joint abnormality, and resorption in the disease group in contrast to the control group. Diclofenac sodium administered rats exhibited the recovery of soft tissue inflammation, bone resorption and corrosion, congestion of joint spacing, and significant development of surrounding muscles of the joint. Similarly, changes observed in radiography evaluation were amended in SSME groups. SSME at 1000 mg/kg dose exhibited better results.
Figure 6

Radiographic assessment of limbs of CFA-induced rats treated with aqueous methanolic extract of S. saligna (A) control; (B) disease; (C) rats treated with the standard drug diclofenac sodium; (D–F) rats treated with aqueous methanolic plant extract at 250, 500, and 1000 mg/kg, respectively.

Radiographic assessment of limbs of CFA-induced rats treated with aqueous methanolic extract of S. saligna (A) control; (B) disease; (C) rats treated with the standard drug diclofenac sodium; (D–F) rats treated with aqueous methanolic plant extract at 250, 500, and 1000 mg/kg, respectively.

Hematological and Biochemical Analysis

The CFA injection markedly elevated the concentrations of ESR, platelets, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), blood urea nitrogen, urea, creatinine, ALP, ALT, CRP, and RF. SSME treatment considerably (p < 0.001) recovered the concentration of these parameters. The levels of RF and CRP variables were considerably raised (37.6 ± 3.04 and 12.98 ± 0.36, respectively) in the disease group rats (Table ), although SSME treatment decreased RF and CRP values in SSME (1000 mg/kg) treated rats (21 ± 1.81 and 3.26 ± 0.27). Platelets, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), blood urea nitrogen, urea, creatinine, ALP, and ALT were significantly elevated in disease group rats. However, SSME significantly reduced the levels of these parameters in rats with SSM at 1000 mg/kg. RBCs, eosinophils and Hb levels were reduced in disease group rats in comparison with control group animals. SSME dose-dependently ameliorated the abnormal hematological and biochemical parameters (Table ).
Table 2

Effects of Aqueous Methanolic Extract of S. saligna on Hematological and Biochemical Parameters in CFA-Induced Arthritic Ratsa

parameterscontrol groupdisease groupstandard groupSSME (250 mg/dL)SSME (500 mg/dL)SSME (1000 mg/dL)
Hb (g/dL)13.02 ± 0.34a10.8 ± 0.51b13.94 ± 0.37a11.3 ± 0.2b12.6 ± 0.18a14.875 ± 0.42a
ESR (mm/first hour)9 ± 0.54a24.92 ± 0.55b15.8 ± 0.86a18.2 ± 0.25a7.8 ± 0.2a7.8 ± 0.66a
RBCs (×106/L)7.46 ± 0.49a4.55 ± 0.26b8.57 ± 0.38a5.274 ± 0.19b5.622 ± 0.33b8.18 ± 0.412832a
Eosinophil (%)3.2 ± 0.73a6.8 ± 0.37b3.4 ± 0.50a3.8 ± 0.37a3.4 ± 0.4a3.2 ± 0.58a
Platelets (×109/L)658.2 ± 2.83ab1876 ± 17.52b875.8 ± 15.81a1764.2 ± 45.55ab1568.6 ± 22.42ab1091.8 ± 21.74ab
AST (U/L)82.6 ± 0.87a211.6 ± 0.87b113.6 ± 0.81a129.6 ± 1.07ns121 ± 0.31ns115.8 ± 0.8a
ALP (U/L)226 ± 5.66ab414.8 ± 1.71b230.6 ± 13.13a318.6 ± 2.48ab291.4 ± 6.18a229.6 ± 4.37a
ALT (U/L)34 ± 1a57.2 ± 2.67b38 ± 1.87a47.8 ± 1.82ab41.2 ± 1.15a39.6 ± 1.50a
Urea (mg/dL)13 ± 0.44a29.8 ± 0.86b14.8 ± 0.37a17.8 ± 1.06b15.6 ± 0.24a14.8 ± 0.37a
Creatinine (mg/dL)0.584 ± 0.06ab1.93 ± 0.02b0.364 ± 0.02a0.834 ± 0.01b0.698 ± 0.05ab0.362 ± 0.02a
CRP(mg/L)5.8 ± 0.52a12.98 ± 0.36b4.32 ± 0.22a10.22 ± 0.66b7.88 ± 1.74a3.26 ± 0.27a
RF (IU/mL)15.76 ± 0.56a37.6 ± 3.04b22.4 ± 1.50a30.4 ± 1.43b28.6 ± 0.74a21 ± 1.81a
BUN (mg/dL)16.2 ± 0.37a2 9.9 ± 0.70b17.4 ± 0.24a26.2 ± 0.2ab18.6 ± 0.24a9.2 ± 0.2a

Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5) and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test. “a” and “b” shows the statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) as compared to disease and standard group, respectively. Hb: hemoglobin; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; RBCs: red blood cells; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; ALP: alkaline phosphatase; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; CRP: C reactive protein; RF: rheumatoid factor; BUN: blood urea nitrogen; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; SSME: S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract.

Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5) and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test. “a” and “b” shows the statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) as compared to disease and standard group, respectively. Hb: hemoglobin; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; RBCs: red blood cells; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; ALP: alkaline phosphatase; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; CRP: C reactive protein; RF: rheumatoid factor; BUN: blood urea nitrogen; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; SSME: S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract.

Effect on Serum Concentration of BCl2, HSP-70, IL-6, and TNF-α

Marked elevation (p < 0.001) in the level of IL-6 (728.68 ± 16.50 pg/mL) was observed in animals of the disease group, and decrease in values (351.31 ± 22.57 pg/mL) were noted at SSME 1000 mg/kg. The raised level of BCl2 (p < 0.001) has been observed in the disease group (27.28 ± 1.28 ng/mL), but it was considerably reduced in the 1000 mg/kg SSME treatment group (13.71 ± 0.22 ng/mL) and standard drug (14.99 ± 0.95 ng/mL). Similarly, a marked rise (p < 0.001) in the serum level of HSP-70 has been determined in the disease group (1.09 ± 0.12 ng/mL); however, SSME 1000 mg/kg (0.152 ± 0.004 ng/mL) and standard drug (0.17 ± 0.004 ng/mL) significantly reduced HSP-70 level. The results showed an elevated serum concentration (p < 0.001) of TNF-α in the rats of the disease group (521.56 ± 8.39 pg/mL) with a considerable decrease by SSME treatment dose (Figure ).
Figure 7

Effect of S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract on inflammatory mediators: BCl2, HSP-70, IL-6, and TNF-α. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5) and analyzed by Tukey’s multiple comparison post-test and two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s. “a” and “b” show the statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) as compared to disease and standard group, respectively. SSME, S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract.

Effect of S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract on inflammatory mediators: BCl2, HSP-70, IL-6, and TNF-α. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5) and analyzed by Tukey’s multiple comparison post-test and two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s. “a” and “b” show the statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) as compared to disease and standard group, respectively. SSME, S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract.

Effect of SSME on mRNA Expression of Inflammatory Biomarkers

The gene expression study was performed after the completion of the experiment by taking blood samples. The mRNA expression levels of NF-kB, COX-2, IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β were significantly elevated (p < 0.001) in CFA treated animals (Figure ). SSME treatment similar to diclofenac sodium considerably ameliorated the raised level of these inflammatory biomarkers, dose-dependently.
Figure 8

Effect of S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract on mRNA expression: NF-kB, COX-2, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-4, IL-10, and I-kB. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5) and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test. “a” and “b” shows statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) as compared to disease and standard group, respectively; SSME, S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract.

Effect of S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract on mRNA expression: NF-kB, COX-2, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-4, IL-10, and I-kB. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5) and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test. “a” and “b” shows statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) as compared to disease and standard group, respectively; SSME, S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract. However, CFA treatment notably (p < 0.001) decreased the expression level of IL-4, IL-10 and I-kB in the disease group. SSME treatment produced a dose-dependent effect and recovered the decline in these markers similar to diclofenac sodium in the treatment groups (Figure ).

Effect on Oxidative Stress

Figure depicted that CFA injection significantly increased oxidative stress (p < 0.001) by decreasing the levels of SOD and CAT (18.22 ± 1.12 and 48.16 ± 2.0 U/mg protein) in the disease group, SSME, and diclofenac sodium treated groups. An increased level of MDA was also noticed in the rats of the disease group (0.56 ± 0.02 μM/g protein) at p < 0.0001 in contrast to the control group (0.13 ± 0.01 μM/g protein); however, the level of MDA was considerably decreased by standard drug, 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg dose of SSME in arthritic animals.
Figure 9

Effect of S. saligna on oxidative stress biomarkers: SOD (superoxide dismutase), catalase, and MDA (malondialdehyde). Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5) and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. “a” and “b” show the statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) as compared to disease and standard group, respectively. SSME, S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract.

Effect of S. saligna on oxidative stress biomarkers: SOD (superoxide dismutase), catalase, and MDA (malondialdehyde). Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5) and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. “a” and “b” show the statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) as compared to disease and standard group, respectively. SSME, S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract.

Discussion

Rheumatoid arthritis is clinically expressed through a series of persistent chronic progressions such as leukocyte infiltration, pannus development, and extreme mutilation of bone and cartilage. Conventional methods of RA treatment have improved this condition in terms of efficacy. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs like etoricoxib; disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs such as hydroxyl chloroquine, leflunomide, sulphasalazine, and methotrexate; and corticosteroids like methylprednisolone and prednisolone have severe side effects.[29] Traditional or herbal therapies are being used extensively by people in the whole world because they produce better results with fewer side effects.[30] In the current study phytochemical analysis of S. saligna was done by using ESI-MS/MS. The anti-arthritic and anti-inflammatory potential of plant extracts probably linked with their phenolic compounds was also monitored. The extract was produced by using aqueous and acidified concentrations of methanol. MS displayed ten phenolics including threonic acid, kaempferol, quercetin, caffeic acid, 5-P-coumaroyl quinic acid, pachyximine-A, p-cumaric acid, ferulic acid, and cinnamic acid. p-Cumaric acid, 5-P-coumaroyl quinic acid, and Pachyximine-A decrease the pain by inhibiting the production of IL-6 and TNF-α.[31] Ferulic acid, caffeic acid, and cinnamic acid have the potential of anti-inflammatory and antioxidant ability by delaying activation of NF-κB and expression of TNF-α.[32] Quercetin acid has the potency to reduce the clinical presentation of inflammation. It prevents the production of NO, IL-6, and PGE2. It also reduces the level of CRP.[33] Kaempherol belongs to flavonol, and it shows a potent anti-inflammatory effect.[26] Previous animal studies have shown that rheumatoid arthritis occurs when protein denaturation starts at the site of administration of CFA which leads to the generation of auto-antigens and showed symptoms like paw edema, joint pain, alteration in joint structure, and reduction in weight.[34] Arthritis produced by CFA is a dual-phase process; the first phase is called the acute phase or induction phase, which remains for 10 days, and in this state the release of prostaglandins G, serotonin, and histamine by the immune system occurs, but there is no validation of synovitis. Later, in the chronic phase, which remains for 11 to 28 days, the disturbance in pro-and anti-inflammatory mediators is expressed as infiltration, synovitis, hypertrophy, and bone erosion.[35] Paw edema is related to vascular penetrability, cellular permeation, and increased fluid discharge in the affected area of inflammation.[36] Assessment of paw diameter is a common tool for estimation of efficacy of anti-arthritic medicines.[37] The reduction in paw diameter demonstrates reduced release of inflammatory mediators which is a key sign of anti-inflammatory action of a medicine or plant extract.[38] In the disease group, inflammation was sustained for 4 weeks due to cellular incursion and persistent fluid and salt accumulation. SSME presented a prominent reduction in paw thickness compared to disease group animals. Results were compared with the previously performed studies where the use of B. calliobotrys and P. amarus extracts decreased the paw size.[39] Similarly, reduced arthritic scoring (also called arthritic index) manifested its anti-inflammatory immunosuppressive activities.[40] Our results of the arthritic index are similar to previously performed research work by Uttra et al., who determined that the maximum decrease in the scoring of arthritis was seen when aqueous ethanolic plant extract was used.[34a] RA is related to reduced body weight during the disease course which is called RA associated cachexia.[41] Previous published data suggested that reduction in body weight is linked with swelling because it obstructs absorption through the gut, while treatment with drugs that lower the inflammation initiates better absorption. S. saligna extract improves body weight through downregulation of TNF-α and by decreasing swelling.[42] The high levels of TNF-α, HSP-70, BCl2, and IL-6 were observed in the serum samples of disease group animals, while these mediators were considerably decreased in SSME and standard drug diclofenac sodium groups after treatment.[43] Many studies have proposed that in the pathogenesis of RA HSP-70, BCl2 plays an important role. BCl2 is mainly involved in the apoptosis process of RA, while TNF-α, IL-1α, and IL-6 induce hsp70 expression during the disease.[44] Our outcomes of PCR are similar to the findings of Hassan et al., which showed significant downregulation of important inflammatory biomarkers by using different fractions and extract formulations of plant and piroxicam.[45] Similarly, significantly decreased levels of IL-4, IL-10, and I-kB and significant upregulation of COX-2, TNF-α, IL-1β, and NF-kB were detected in disease group animals. Administration of methanol and aqueous extracts of M. rivae and piroxicam changed the concentrations of these mediators in favor of treatment of RA.[54] IL-1β excites the production of enzymes like matrix metalloproteinase and osteoclast stimulation and causes bone damage.[46] It also promotes the resorption of bone and the production of autoantibodies.[47] Osteoclast stimulation is produced by NF-kB that provokes synovial apoptosis and erosion of bone. It also acts as an immunoregulator by regulating IL-6, IL-1β, and nitric oxide synthase. High levels of NF-kB intensify arthritic symptoms.[48] The level of I-kB was reduced while there was an increase in the concentration of NF-kB in rats of the disease group; however, the reverse response was detected in SSME treated rats. NF-kB antagonists have curing activity against RA.[49] Inflammatory mediators promote COX-2 and lead to high PGE2 levels at the synovium.[50] SSME decreased angiogenesis and synovitis via the low level of COX-2 and PGE2. IL-4 antagonizes the production of Th1 and favors the development of the Th2 cell.[49] IL-10 blocks Th1 cell-mediated cytokines and prevents the mRNA expression of IL-18. It is also involved in compromised functions of antigen-presenting cells and maintains the joint stability.[42b] SSME significantly decreased the levels of NF-kB, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β, and COX-2, but innocently upregulated I-kB, IL-10, and IL-4 concentrations. So, increased levels of immune-regulatory cytokines decreased concentrations of inflammatory mediators, and breakdown of arachidonic acid might be a mechanism liable for the SSME anti-arthritic activity. Changes in biochemical and hematological parameters were also seen during this study. The low concentrations of Hb and RBC generally lead to anemia. The mechanism behind this is bone marrow defect, low concentration of erythropoietin, and erythrocyte loss produced by the increased level of IL-1β in arthritic animals.[51]S. saligna and the standard drug remarkably improved the levels of these parameters by reducing the levels of IL-1β. Moreover, the increase in platelet level is due to stimulation of the immune process which is linked with the development of TNF-α and IL-1β in the disease group. The reduction of these biomarkers in the SSME treatment groups showed the immunoregulatory function of S. saligna. Correspondingly, an increased level of CRP and RF was measured in the arthritic rats, while standard drug and S. saligna produced a reduction in these parameters, which showed the shielding effect of the extract.[52] Previously performed research work has acknowledged that cytokines like IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β stimulate the development of RF and CRP, while SSME decreased the concentration of these, leading to improvement in RA condition.[53] Increased ALP, AST, and ALT concentrations are connected with raised bradykinin levels which leads to liver damage,[54] and the role of ALP is related to the destruction of the bone and is a parameter to assess lysosomal integrity. SSME and diclofenac sodium significantly decreased the values of these parameters, which may enhance the integrity of lysosomes and inhibit bone annihilation, as shown by radiographic analysis in the present study.[1] Increase in the levels of urea and creatinine was noticed in diseased rats because of the compromised function of the kidneys.[55] The histopathological analysis also revealed that S. saligna decreased infiltration of cells and improved vascularity with less inflammation and synovium width. Uttra et al. showed in their study that animals administered with C. cassia extract showed substantial relief from RA symptoms, and these findings mirrored our current results.[43] Thus, histopathological and radiographic assessment of rats showed that SSME decelerated RA associated joint and bone injury. It was determined that CAT and SOD concentrations were reduced, while MDA level was increased in disease group rats. However, diclofenac sodium and SSME recovered (p < 0.001) the levels of SOD, CAT, and MDA in arthritic rats compared to arthritic rats. Similarly, a previously reported study presented that the level of these parameters was moved to normal levels in rats treated with extract of S. anacardium. Oxidative stress disturbs gene transcription. CFA enhances the level of inflammatory mediators and increases oxidative stress that leads to stimulation of immune cells and generates enzymes and cytokines to aggravate RA.[56] The results of the CFA-induced arthritis model such as the decrease in paw diameter, arthritic index, improvement in hematological and biochemical factors, and histopathological and radiographic study along with the outcomes of ELISA and qRT-PCR are in favor of the plant’s anti-inflammatory and anti-arthritic activity.

Conclusion

SSME improved the symptoms of RA by amending the body weight of rats, pannus development, edema, bone destruction, and anemia. It has markedly reduced the arthritic index. The synovitis and articular harm were decreased by upregulation of anti-inflammatory markers: IL-4, I-κB, and IL-10. The pro-inflammatory mediators COX-2, PGE2, IL-1β and IL-6, NF-κB, and TNF-α were downregulated in the treatment groups. Almost ten bioactive phytoconstituents were identified with mass spectrometry which might be attributed to the anti-arthritic activity of SSME. The undertaken study suggests that SSME could be a potential therapeutic remedy for arthritis after clinical and safety evaluation.

Materials and Methods

Plant Collection and Extraction

Fresh plant S. saligna was collected in September 2020 from the area of Abaspur, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan. The plant was identified and authenticated by Dr Irfan Mehmood, associate professor at boys degree college Abaspur AJK. Voucher sample AJKH-21021 had been issued for the crude plant to the Azad Jammu Kashmir Medicinal & Aromatic Plants Herbarium for future reference. The aerial parts of the plant were rinsed with tap water and dried under shade for 1 week, and then ground to a fine powder. Microwave extraction technology was used for the preparation of plant extract. This procedure has three main phases. The voltage of the microwave was set at 9000 W. In the first phase, 750 mL of aqueous methanol (20:80) was poured into a 1000 mL beaker that had 100 g of plant powder. The beaker was put into the oven for 2 min, and then for 30 s, its door was kept open. This process was repeated five times. Two more cycles were performed using the same procedure with 500 mL aqueous methanol (20:80) in the beaker. The extract was filtered first with the muslin cloth; then Whatman filter paper was used. Excess solvent was removed from the filtrate with rotary evaporation at 40 °C. The S. saligna aqueous methanolic extract (SSME) was stored in an amber-colored bottle until analysis.[57]

Experimental Animals

Thirty healthy male and female Wistar rats (weighing 150 to 200 g) were kept in the animal house of the Govt. College University, Faisalabad-Pakistan. The standard laboratory conditions, i.e., temperature: 25 ± 2 °C, humidity: 55 ± 5%, and 12 h dark and light cycles, were maintained in the animal house. They had free access to food and water.

Ethical Approval

The experimental work was carried out after getting approval from the institutional review board, Government College University, Faisalabad (GCUF). The reference number issued was GCUF/ERC/2200. This study was conducted under the recommendations of the National Institute of Health regarding laboratory rodent ethics.

Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry Study

ESI-MS/MS was carried out by using a Linear Ion Trap Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, USA) equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI) machine. The test sample was investigated by direct injection into the syringe pump at a 13 μL/min flow rate in the negative mode of ionization of ESI source. The temperature of the capillary was set at 198 °C. A comprehensive scan of mass spectrum data was attained in the mass range of 50–2000 m/z. The final ionization produced was confiscated in the ion source and fragmented by collision-induced dissociation energies (CID) in the 16–32 range based on the constancy of the obvious forerunner ions identified for cyclic mass spectrometry.[58]

In Vivo Assessment of the Anti-Arthritic Potential of SSME against Complete Freund’s Adjuvant (CFA)-Induced Arthritis

Experimental Design for Anti-Arthritic Activity

Arthritis was induced by injecting 150 μL CFA in the subplantar region of the left hind paw in all the rat groups except the normal control group. Oral administration of the standard drug and the extract was started after the 7th day of CFA injection until the 28th day. LD50 of SSME was greater than 1000 mg/kg.[59] Thirty rats were randomly divided into six groups (n = 5). Group I served as control and received only vehicle. Group II served as disease. Group III was designated as standard, and diclofenac sodium (10 mg/kg/day) was administered orally. Groups IV–VI were treatment groups, receiving aqueous methanolic plant extract at 250, 500, and 1000 mg/kg doses orally, respectively.

Evaluation of Arthritis by Physical Parameters

The weight of animals was noted before starting the study, on the 3rd day, and then weekly until the 28th day of study, and paw thickness was determined in terms of paw diameter by using a digital Vernier caliper and recorded on days 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 after CFA injection.

Arthritis Index

The intensity of the disease was determined in the hind paw and scored from 0 to 4; i.e., 0 = no inflammation, while 1 to 4 are expressed as minimal swelling, swelling of the ankle and surrounding joints, intense swelling of ankle joints, and swelling of the entire paw.[60]

Histopathological Analysis

For histopathological analysis, the ankle joints were excised and kept in 10% formalin.[60]

Radiography

The hind limbs of slaughtered animals had been detached from knee joints and were subjected to radiographic examination.[51]

Haematological and Biochemical Analyses

After the completion of the study after 4 weeks, the rats were killed through slight chloroform anesthesia, and blood was collected through a cardiac puncture. An automatic hemocytometer was used to evaluate blood parameters like hemoglobin (Hb), white and red blood cells, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and platelet count, whereas the biochemical parameters like Aspartate transaminase (AST), Alanine transaminase (ALT), urea, Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), creatinine, C-reactive protein (CRP), and Rheumatoid factor (RF) were determined by following the equipment manufacturer’s instructions of the auto analyzer.

Effect on Serum Concentration of BCl2, HSP, IL-6, and TNF-α

ELISA was performed for quantitative analysis of TNF-α (Elabscience, catalogue number E-EL-H0109, HSP-70 (Elabscience, catalogue number E-EL-R0479), BCl2 (Elabscience, catalogue number E-EL-R0096), and IL-6 (Elabscience, catalogue number E-EL-H0102) by using commercial relevant kits. ELISA reader (BI, 800TS-UV) was used to measure the absorbance at 450 nm.

Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)

Quantitative assessment of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators and metabolic enzymes in the blood samples of experimental rats was performed by qRT-PCR. Blood was taken from animals and kept in tubes containing EDTA, and the TRIzol process was applied to isolate RNA from samples of blood. The purity and final yield were determined by Nanodrop. The cDNA was developed via reverse transcription by applying the protocol of the kit manufacturer. For magnification and quantitative analysis, the Sybr green master mix (2×) kit standard procedure was used on qRT-PCR on the Bio-Rad machine. 1 μL each pair of primers, 7 μL nuclease-free water, 1 μL cDNA, and 10 μL Sybr mix were poured into the individual microplate well. Then, it was shifted to a machine called thermal cycler set at 45 cycles of denaturation at the temperature of 95 °C, annealing at 60 °C and termination at 72 °C. Housekeeping gene and primers were formulated by using primer 3, primer quest, and Genbank.[61] The list of primers used in qRT-PCR is shown in Table .
Table 3

List of Primers Used in qRT-PCR

biomarkersforward/reversesequencegene accession no.
COX-2Forward5-ATCAGGTCATCGGTGGACAG-3′S67722.1
 Reverse5-CTCGTCATCCCACTCAGGAT-3′ 
NF-kBForward5-AAGATGTGGTGGAGGACTTG-3′NM_001276711.1
 Reverse5-GGTGGTTGATAAGGAGTGCT-3′ 
IL-1βForward5-AGTCTGCACAGTTCCCCAAC-3′NM-031512.2
 Reverse5-GAGACCTGACTTGGCAGAGG-3′ 
IL-6Forward5-TCACAGAAGGAGTGGCTAAGM26744.1
 Reverse5-TCTGACCACAGTGAGGAATG-3′ 
IL-10Forward5-CAGGTTGCTCCTTCCATGAT-3′L02926.1
 Reverse5-AACAATACGCCATTCCCAAG-3′ 
1-kβForward5-GCAGGAGTGTTGGTGACTGA-3′NM-030867.2
 Reverse5-TAGCTGCAGCCTCCAATCTT-3′ 
IL-4Forward5-AGCTATTGATGGGTCTCAGC-3′NM-201270.1
 Reverse5-TGACCTGGTTCAAAGTGTTG-3′ 
TNF-αForward5-GGTGTCTTTACAGACCCGAAG-3X66539.1
 Reverse5-TCTACATAGTCAGCCAAACAGC-3 
GAPDHForward5-GCCTCCAAGGAGTAAGAAAC-3′AF106860.2
 Reverse5-GATGGTATTCGAGAGAAGGG-3′ 

Determination of Oxidative Stress Biomarkers

The blood was taken and serum was separated for the evaluation of the oxidative stress biomarkers by using suitable kits like CAT (Elabscience, catalogue number E-BC-K106), SOD (Elabscience, catalogue number E-BC-K020), and MDA (Elabscience, catalogue number E-EL-0060). ELISA reader model number BI, 800TS-UV was used to determine the absorbance.

Statistical Analysis

All results were expressed as mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed with GraphPad Prism version 5.00. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test was applied to analyze inflammatory mediators measured by ELISA, the mRNA gene expression of inflammatory biomarkers, and oxidative stress biomarkers. Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posthoc-test was applied to assess the paw diameter, scoring, body weight, and hematological and biochemical analysis of CFA induced arthritis.
  54 in total

1.  New steroidal alkaloids from Sarcococca saligna.

Authors:  M I Choudhary; M R Khan; S Anjum; A Farooq; M Z Iqbal
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.050

2.  New steroidal alkaloids from Sarcococca saligna.

Authors:  Fareeda Feroz; Sarfraz A Nawaz; M Riaz Khan; M Iqbal Choudhary
Journal:  Nat Prod Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.861

Review 3.  The expanding family of interleukin-1 cytokines and their role in destructive inflammatory disorders.

Authors:  H E Barksby; S R Lea; P M Preshaw; J J Taylor
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Studies on cardio-suppressant, vasodilator and tracheal relaxant effects of Sarcococca saligna.

Authors:  Muhammad Nabeel Ghayur; Anwarul Hassan Gilani
Journal:  Arch Pharm Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.946

5.  Current and future therapeutic targets of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Yuan Ming Di; Zhi-Wei Zhou; Chun Guang Li; Shu-Feng Zhou
Journal:  Antiinflamm Antiallergy Agents Med Chem       Date:  2011

6.  Ephedra gerardiana aqueous ethanolic extract and fractions attenuate Freund Complete Adjuvant induced arthritis in Sprague Dawley rats by downregulating PGE2, COX2, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, NF-kB and upregulating IL-4 and IL-10.

Authors:  Ambreen Malik Uttra; Muhammad Shahzad; Arham Shabbir; Shah Jahan
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.360

7.  In vivo quercitrin anti-inflammatory effect involves release of quercetin, which inhibits inflammation through down-regulation of the NF-kappaB pathway.

Authors:  Mònica Comalada; Desirée Camuesco; Saleta Sierra; Isabel Ballester; Jordi Xaus; Julio Gálvez; Antonio Zarzuelo
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  Prospective 7 year follow up imaging study comparing radiography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis finger joints.

Authors:  A K Scheel; K-G A Hermann; S Ohrndorf; C Werner; C Schirmer; J Detert; M Bollow; B Hamm; G A Müller; G R Burmester; M Backhaus
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Diagnostic properties of metabolic perturbations in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Rasmus K Madsen; Torbjörn Lundstedt; Jon Gabrielsson; Carl-Johan Sennbro; Gerd-Marie Alenius; Thomas Moritz; Solbritt Rantapää-Dahlqvist; Johan Trygg
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 5.156

Review 10.  Inhibitory mechanism against oxidative stress of caffeic acid.

Authors:  Farhan Ahmed Khan; Aneela Maalik; Ghulam Murtaza
Journal:  J Food Drug Anal       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 6.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.