| Literature DB >> 35473554 |
Zheng Zhang1, Xin Zhang1, Yifei Yin2, Shuangshuang Zhao1, Keke Wang1, Mengyuan Shang1, Baoding Chen3, Xincai Wu4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The advantages of prophylactic central lymph node dissection (CLND) for clinically node-negative patients remained a great deal of controversies. Our research was aimed to analyze the relationship between cervical central lymph node metastasis (CLNM) and BRAFV600E mutation, ultrasonic and clinicopathologic characterizes in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: In current study, a total of 112 consecutive PTC patients who experienced thyroidectomy plus cervical central neck dissection were included in our research. All PTC were pre-operatively analyzed by ultrasonic features, including tumor size, multifocality or not, tumor location, internal components, echogenicity, microcalcification, margins, orientation, taller than wide shape, and internal vascularity. The presence of clinicopathologic factors, including age, sex, T stage, Hashimoto's thyroiditis, and BRAFV600E mutation was then investigated. Univariate and multivariate analysis were conducted to check into the relationship between predictive factors and cervical CLNM in PTC patients, and then a predictive model was also established.Entities:
Keywords: BRAFV600E mutation; Cervical central lymph node metastases; Clinicopathologic factors; Papillary thyroid carcinoma; Ultrasonic features
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35473554 PMCID: PMC9044661 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09550-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.638
Clinicopathologic and US features of cervical CLNM in PTC patients. N = number of papillary thyroid carcinoma; CLNM = central lymph node metastasis; PTC = papillary thyroid carcinoma
| Characteristics | Total PTC with or without cervical LNM( | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Positive ( | Negative ( | ||
| 39.82 ± 10.29 | 47.28 ± 11.44 | ||
| < 55 years | 56 (86.2%) | 30 (63.8%) | |
| ≥ 55 years | 9 (13.8%) | 17 (36.2%) | |
| Male | 21 (32.3%) | 14 (29.8%) | |
| Female | 44 (67.7%) | 33 (70.2%) | |
| 12 ± 4.6 mm | 9.8 ± 4.6 mm | ||
| > 10 mm | 42 (64.6%) | 15 (31.9%) | |
| ≤ 10 mm | 23 (35.4%) | 32 (68.1%) | |
| Multifocal | 18 (27.7%) | 12 (25.5%) | |
| Unifocal | 47 (72.3%) | 35 (74.5%) | |
| Left | 35 (53.8%) | 21 (44.7%) | |
| Right | 26 (40%) | 23 (48.9%) | |
| Isthmus | 4 (6.2%) | 3 (6.4%) | |
| Solid | 61 (93.8%) | 44 (93.6%) | |
| Cystic | 4 (6.2%) | 3 (6.4%) | |
| Present | 55 (84.6%) | 40 (85.1%) | |
| Absent | 10 (15.4%) | 7 (14.9%) | |
| Present | 51 (78.5%) | 25 (53.2%) | |
| Absent | 14 (21.5%) | 22 (46.8%) | |
| Irregular/lobulated | 42 (64.6%) | 27 (57.4%) | |
| Regular | 23 (35.4%) | 20 (42.6%) | |
| Non-parallel | 21 (32.3%) | 14 (29.8%) | |
| Parallel | 44 (67.7%) | 33 (70.2%) | |
| Present | 28 (43.1%) | 22 (46.8%) | |
| Absent | 37 (56.9%) | 25 (53.2%) | |
| T1 | 29 (44.6%) | 29 (61.7%) | |
| T2 | 35 (53.8%) | 17 (36.2%) | |
| T3/T4 | 1 (1.5%) | 1 (2.1%) | |
| Concomitant | 7 (10.8%) | 15 (31.9%) | |
| Non-concomitant | 58 (89.2%) | 32 (68.1%) | |
| Present | 27 (41.5%) | 18 (38.3%) | |
| Absent | 38 (58.5%) | 29 (61.7%) | |
| Positive | 40 (61.5%) | 16 (34.0%) | |
| Negative | 25 (38.5%) | 31 (66.0%) | |
Multivariate logistic regression analysis in predicting cervical CLNM in PTC patients. CLNM = central lymph node metastasis; PTC = papillary thyroid carcinoma
| PTC characteristics | β Coefficient | Odds ratio | 95% Confidence Interval | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age < 55 years | 1.284 | 3.609 | 1.212–10.750 | 0.021 |
| Tumor size > 10 mm | 1.241 | 3.457 | 1.328–9.002 | 0.011 |
| Microcalcification | 1.143 | 3.137 | 1.155–8.521 | 0.025 |
| Non-Hashimoto’s thyroiditis | 2.097 | 8.138 | 2.326–28.468 | 0.001 |
| BRAF mutation | 1.628 | 5.095 | 1.764–14.713 | 0.003 |
Fig. 1Forest plot of the risk factors of cervical CLNM in PTC patients
Fig. 2Ultrasonic image showing a 17-mm papillary thyroid cancer in a 22 years-old woman harboring cervical CLNM. a The papillary thyroid cancer with tumor size > 10 mm and microcalcification on US. b Blood flow is shown on color doppler image. c Pathologic examination confirmed the diagnosis of metastatic central lymph node (hematoxylin–eosin stain, × 100). d Another PTC participant without cervical CLNM. Pathologic examination confirmed the diagnosis of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (hematoxylin–eosin stain, × 100)
Fig. 3Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of (a) age < 55 years old (area under the ROC curve [AUROC] = 0.664), tumor size > 10 mm (AUROC = 0.612), microcalcification (AUROC = 0.626), non-concomitant Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (AUROC = 0.606) and BRAFV600E mutation (AUROC = 0.637), respectively. (b) Equation (AUROC = 0.845) for the prediction of cervical CLNM
ROC analysis of the independent factors and equation for predicting cervical CLNM in PTC patients. CI = confidence interval; CLNM = central lymph node metastasis; N = number of papillary thyroid carcinoma; PTC = papillary thyroid carcinoma
| Az | 95% CI | Cutoff value | Sensitivity | Specificity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall ( | |||||
| Age < 55y | 0.612 | 0.504–0.720 | Age < 55y | 0.862 | 0.362 |
| Tumor size > 10 mm | 0.664 | 0.561–0.766 | Tumor size > 10 mm | 0.646 | 0.681 |
| Microcalcification | 0.626 | 0.520–0.733 | Microcalcification | 0.785 | 0.468 |
| Non-Hashimoto’s thyroiditis | 0.606 | 0.497–0.714 | Non-Hashimoto’s thyroiditis | 0.892 | 0.319 |
| BRAF mutation | 0.637 | 0.533–0.742 | BRAF mutation | 0.615 | 0.660 |
| Predictive equation | 0.845 | 0.771–0.918 | 0.593 | 0.738 | 0.851 |