| Literature DB >> 32139703 |
Jinhua Ding1,2, Weizhu Wu1,2, Jianjiang Fang3,4, Jing Zhao1,2, Li Jiang5,6.
Abstract
The differences in prognosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) by sex have been investigated in several previous studies, but the results have not been consistent. In addition, the impact of sex on the clinical and pathological characteristics, especially on central lymph node metastasis (CLNM), still remains unknown. To the best of our knowledge, the impact of sex on PTC has not been investigated in the Chinese PTC population. Therefore, our study retrospectively analysed the data of 1339 patients who were diagnosed with PTC and had received radical surgery at Ningbo Medical Center, Lihuili Hospital. In addition to cancer-specific death, structural recurrence and risk stratification, prognosis was also estimated by using three conventional prognostic systems: AMES (age, distant metastasis, extent, size), MACIS (distant metastasis, age, completeness of resection, local invasion, size) and the 8th version TNM (tumor, lymph node, metastasis) staging system. The clinical and pathological characteristics and above prognostic indexes were compared between male and female PTC patients. The results showed that there were higher rates of non-microcarcinoma PTC (nM-PTC), CLNM, lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM), advanced disease and bilateral disease, but there was a lower rate of concurrent Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT) in male PTC patients than in female PTC patients. Additionally, the rate of intermediate-risk, high-risk or advanced disease was higher in male PTC patients. The above findings indicate that PTC in men is a more aggressive disease and may have a worse prognosis; thus, it should be treated with more caution.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32139703 PMCID: PMC7058033 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-60199-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Surgical treatments of 1339 PTC patients.
| Surgical patterns | Number of patients | % |
|---|---|---|
| Lobectomy + isthmectomy + CLND | 665 | 49.7 |
| Total thyroidectomy + CLND | 454 | 33.9 |
| Lobectomy + isthmectomy + CLND + LLND | 18 | 1.3 |
| Total thyroidectomy + CLND + LLND | 202 | 15.1 |
PTC: papillary thyroid carcinoma; CLND: central lymph node dissection; LLND: lateral lymph node dissection.
Figure 1Flow chart of this study. PTC: papillary thyroid carcinoma; CLN: central lymph node.
Patients’ demographics features and clinicopathological characteristics.
| Variable | Number of patients | % |
|---|---|---|
| Case number | 1339 | |
| Age (mean ± SD, years) | 45.7 ± 11.2 | |
| Groups (<55 years vs ≥55 years) | 1016/323 | 75.9/24.1 |
| Gender (m/f) | 289/1050 | 21.6/78.4 |
| BMI (≤25 vs >25 Kg/m2) | 377/962 | 28.2/71.8 |
| Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (yes/no) | 233/1106 | 17.4/82.6 |
| Graves’ disease (yes/no) | 13/1326 | 1.0/99.0 |
| Nodular goiters (yes/no) | 421/918 | 31.4/68.6 |
| Basic disease (yes/no) | 133/1206 | 10.0/90.0 |
| Malignant tumor history | 13/1326 | 1.0/99.0 |
| Laterality (left/right/both sites) | 519/606/214 | 38.8/45.2/16.0 |
| TSH level (mIU/L, mean ± SD) | 2.9 ± 1.5 | — |
| Free-T3 level (pmol/L, mean ± SD) | 4.1 ± 1.6 | — |
| Free-T4 level (pmol/L, mean ± SD) | 16.2 ± 5.4 | — |
| Tumor size (≤10 mm vs >10 mm) | 941/398 | 70.3/29.7 |
| Multifocality (yes/no) | 177/1162 | 13.2/86.8 |
| Bilaterality (yes/no) | 214/1125 | 16.0/84.0 |
| Extrathyroid extension (yes/no) | 78/1261 | 5.8/94.2 |
| Number of CLNs removed | 5.8 ± 2.3 | — |
| Number of LLNs harvest | 23.8 ± 10.4 | — |
| Lymph node metastasis (yes/no) | 653/686 | 48.8/51.2 |
SD: standard deviation;
BMI: body-mass index; TSH: Thyroid Stimulating Hormone; Free-T3: free triiodothyroxine; Free-T4:free
tetraiodothyroxine; CLN: central lymph node; LLN: lateral lymph node.
Relationship between sex and clinicopathological characteristics in 1339 PTC patients PTC: papillary thyroid carcinoma; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; BMI: body-mass index; TSH: thyroid stimulating hormone; CLNM: central lymph node metastasis; LLNM: lateral lymph node metastasis.
| Variables | Male (n) | Female (n) | P value | OR | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <55 years | 224 | 792 | 0.258 | 1.123 | 0.824–1.530 |
| ≥55years | 65 | 258 | |||
| ≤25 | 205 | 757 | 0.712 | 0.945 | 0.709–1.259 |
| >25 | 84 | 293 | |||
| Left | 114 | 423 | 0.291 | — | — |
| Right | 135 | 516 | |||
| Left+Right | 40 | 111 | |||
| ≤ 2.9 | 162 | 612 | 0.502 | 0.913 | 0.702–1.187 |
| > 2.9 | 127 | 438 | |||
| Yes | 23 | 210 | <0.001 | 0.346 | 0.220–0.544 |
| No | 266 | 840 | |||
| ≤ 10 | 184 | 745 | 0.036 | 0.739 | 0.561–0.973 |
| >10 | 105 | 305 | |||
| Yes | 49 | 128 | 0.039 | 1.471 | 1.027–2.105 |
| No | 240 | 922 | |||
| Yes | 62 | 152 | 0.005 | 1.614 | 1.161–2.243 |
| No | 227 | 898 | |||
| Yes | 49 | 149 | 0.241 | 1.235 | 0.868–1.757 |
| No | 240 | 901 | |||
| Yes | 158 | 458 | 0.001 | 1.559 | 1.200–2.025 |
| No | 131 | 592 | |||
| Yes | 61 | 149 | 0.005 | 1.618 | 1.161–2.254 |
| No | 228 | 901 | |||
Multivariate logistic regression analysis by sex.
| Variable | B | S.E. | Wals | df | Sig. | Exp (B) | 95%CI for Exp (B) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||||||
| Tumor size | 0.624 | 0.174 | 12.527 | 1 | <0.001 | 1.762 | 1.298 | 2.392 |
| Bilaterality | −0.408 | 0.180 | 5.117 | 1 | 0.024 | 0.665 | 0.467 | 0.947 |
| Multifocality | −0.173 | 0.195 | 0.790 | 1 | 0.374 | 0.841 | 0.574 | 1.232 |
| HT | 1.104 | 0.232 | 22.590 | 1 | <0.001 | 3.015 | 1.913 | 4.752 |
| CLNM | −0.496 | 0.176 | 7.941 | 1 | 0.005 | 0.609 | 0.431 | 0.860 |
| LLNM | −0.427 | 0.182 | 5.506 | 1 | 0.019 | 0.652 | 0.457 | 0.932 |
CI: confidence interval; HT: Hoshimoto’s thyroiditis; CLNM: central lymph node metastasis; LLNM: lateral lymph node metastasis. B: regression coefficient. S.E: standard error. Wals: a statistic of test, which is numerically equal to the square of B divided by S.E. df: degree of freedom. Sig: significance. Exp (B): odds ratio.
Structural recurrences in19 PTC patients.
| Recurrence site | Number of patients | % |
|---|---|---|
| Thyroid bed | 1 | 5.0 |
| Central compartment | 1 | 5.0 |
| Level 1 | 1 | 5.0 |
| Level 2 | 2 | 10.0 |
| Level 3 | 8 | 40.0 |
| Level 4 | 6 | 30.0 |
| Level 5 | 1 | 5.0 |
Evaluation of the expectant prognostic outcome using different staging system or scoring system.
| Staging | Male (n) | Female (n) | P value | OR | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High risk | 12 | 30 | 0.339 | 1.473 | 0.744–2.915 |
| Low risk | 277 | 1020 | |||
| Mean | 4.32 ± 0.80 | 4.28 ± 0.82 | 0.562 | ||
| <6 | 271 | 1002 | 0.282 | 0.721 | 0.413–1.260 |
| ≥6 | 18 | 48 | |||
| Stage I | 246 | 941 | 0.033 | 0.663 | 0.453–0.969 |
| Stage II/III/IV | 43 | 109 | |||
AJCC:American Joint Committee on Cancer; TNM: tumor size, involved lymph node, distant metastasis. *Stage I is calculated as early disease, stage II, III and IV are calculated together as advanced disease.