| Literature DB >> 35469250 |
Patrick Buchanan1, David W Lee2, Ashley Comer3, Zohra Hussaini4, Casey Grillo5, Shashank Vodapally6, Natalie H Strand7, Dawood Sayed4, Timothy R Deer3.
Abstract
Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is a common cause of low back pain. Traditionally, treatment for SIJ joint pain and dysfunction has consisted of physical therapy, medication management, SIJ injections, and SIJ ablations. Improved recognition of the SIJ as an etiology for back pain has led to advances in treatment options. Radiofrequency of the lateral sacral branches has been shown to be effective, though evidence is fraught with inconsistent patient selection, study design and procedural technique. It also does not directly address the mechanical dysfunction of the SIJ. In order to create a more enduring approach SIJ fusion has become an attractive option to reduce pain and to improve function. This method of SI joint treatment requires guidance in the perioperative phase of care from both the physicians and advanced practice providers (APP). In order to improve care and outcomes of those undergoing posterior SI joint fusion the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience appointed an expert panel of physicians and advanced practice providers to create a best practice for the post operative care of this approach. As with any best practice, the panel considered current peer reviewed literature and clinical expertise to create guidance today. This is intended to be a living document with modifications as additional evidence comes to light in data publication. The goals of this paper are to focus on (1) wound care, (2) medication use, (3) physical activity and (4) therapeutic exercises.Entities:
Keywords: SIJ; best practices; low back pain; minimally invasive; physical therapy; postoperative care; review; sacroiliac joint
Year: 2022 PMID: 35469250 PMCID: PMC9034860 DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S357123
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pain Res ISSN: 1178-7090 Impact factor: 2.832
Figure 1Optimal placement of guide pin in the oblique view.
Figure 2Optimal placement of guide pin in lateral view.
Figure 3Fluoroscopic image of external dilator at the posterior cortical line in the lateral view.
Figure 4Closure of the surgical wound.
Recommendations for Postoperative Physical Therapy
| Phase | Weeks Out from Surgery | New Goals with Physical Therapy* |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0–5 weeks | ● Educate patient on restrictions (no bending, lifting >10 lbs, wearing pelvic belt correctly, and twisting at the waist for 12 weeks) |
| 2 | 6–11 weeks | ● Continue patient education with added focus on limiting activity to properly performing ADLs and walking |
| 3 | 12–19 week | ● Continue to advance HEP with addition of resistance exercises and progress patients stabilization exercises |
| 4 | Greater than 20 weeks | ● All restrictions with day-to-day activity are lifted |
Notes: *While introducing patients to the new physical therapy goals during each phase, it is equally important to engrain and build upon teachings from prior phases as well rather than focus solely on the newly introduced goals.
Figure 5Passive hamstring stretch.
Figure 6Passive external hip rotator stretch.
Figure 7(A and B) Both the abdominal draw-in maneuver (A) and quadruped exercise (B) have been found to increase activation of the transversus abdominis muscle as well as recruit other core stabilizers such as erector spinae, multifidus, and oblique abdominal muscles.47 In both exercises the anterior abdominal wall (white dot) should be drawn in toward the spine as depicted by the orange arrow.
Figure 8Bridging and clam shell with 30 degrees of hip flexion are a few exercises that have been found to activate the gluteus maximus muscle.48