Timothy R Deer1, Samer Narouze2, David A Provenzano3, Jason E Pope4, Steven M Falowski5, Marc A Russo6, Honorio Benzon7, Konstantin Slavin8, Julie G Pilitsis9, Kenneth Alo10, Jonathan D Carlson11, Porter McRoberts12, Shivanand P Lad13, Jeffrey Arle14, Robert M Levy15, Brian Simpson16, Nagy Mekhail17. 1. Center for Pain Relief, Charleston, WV, USA. 2. Summa Western Reserve Hospital, Cuyahoga Falls, OH, USA. 3. Pain Diagnostics and Interventional Care, Sewickley, PA, USA. 4. Summit Pain Alliance, Santa Rosa, CA, USA. 5. St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA. 6. Hunter Pain Clinic, Broadmeadow, NSW, Australia. 7. Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. 8. University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 9. Neuroscience Institute, Albany, NY, USA. 10. North American Spine, Houston, TX, USA. 11. Arizona Pain/Pain Doctor, Midwestern Medical School, Glendale, Arizona, USA. 12. Holy Cross Hospital, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA. 13. Division of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. 14. Neurosurgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. 15. Marcus Neuroscience Institute, Boca Raton, FL, USA. 16. Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK. 17. Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) was formed by the International Neuromodulation Society (INS) in 2012 to evaluate the evidence to reduce the risk of complications and improve the efficacy of neurostimulation. The first series of papers, published in 2014, focused on the general principles of appropriate practice in the surgical implantation of neurostimulation devices. The NACC was reconvened in 2014 to address specific patient care issues, including bleeding and coagulation. METHODS: The INS strives to improve patient care in an evidence-based fashion. The NACC members were appointed or recruited by the INS leadership for diverse expertise, including international clinical expertise in many areas of neurostimulation, evidence evaluation, and publication. The group developed best practices based on peer-reviewed evidence and, in the absence of specific evidence, on expert opinion. Recommendations were based on international evidence in accordance with guideline creation. CONCLUSIONS: The NACC has recommended specific measures to reduce the risk of bleeding and neurological injury secondary to impairment of coagulation in the setting of implantable neurostimulation devices in the spine, brain, and periphery.
INTRODUCTION: The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) was formed by the International Neuromodulation Society (INS) in 2012 to evaluate the evidence to reduce the risk of complications and improve the efficacy of neurostimulation. The first series of papers, published in 2014, focused on the general principles of appropriate practice in the surgical implantation of neurostimulation devices. The NACC was reconvened in 2014 to address specific patient care issues, including bleeding and coagulation. METHODS: The INS strives to improve patient care in an evidence-based fashion. The NACC members were appointed or recruited by the INS leadership for diverse expertise, including international clinical expertise in many areas of neurostimulation, evidence evaluation, and publication. The group developed best practices based on peer-reviewed evidence and, in the absence of specific evidence, on expert opinion. Recommendations were based on international evidence in accordance with guideline creation. CONCLUSIONS: The NACC has recommended specific measures to reduce the risk of bleeding and neurological injury secondary to impairment of coagulation in the setting of implantable neurostimulation devices in the spine, brain, and periphery.
Authors: Timothy R Deer; Steven Falowski; Jeff E Arle; Jan Vesper; Julie Pilitsis; Konstantin V Slavin; Maria Hancu; Jay S Grider; Alon Y Mogilner Journal: Pain Med Date: 2020-11-07 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Robert W Hurley; Meredith C B Adams; Meredith Barad; Arun Bhaskar; Anuj Bhatia; Andrea Chadwick; Timothy R Deer; Jennifer Hah; W Michael Hooten; Narayan R Kissoon; David Wonhee Lee; Zachary Mccormick; Jee Youn Moon; Samer Narouze; David A Provenzano; Byron J Schneider; Maarten van Eerd; Jan Van Zundert; Mark S Wallace; Sara M Wilson; Zirong Zhao; Steven P Cohen Journal: Pain Med Date: 2021-11-26 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Robert W Hurley; Meredith C B Adams; Meredith Barad; Arun Bhaskar; Anuj Bhatia; Andrea Chadwick; Timothy R Deer; Jennifer Hah; W Michael Hooten; Narayan R Kissoon; David Wonhee Lee; Zachary Mccormick; Jee Youn Moon; Samer Narouze; David A Provenzano; Byron J Schneider; Maarten van Eerd; Jan Van Zundert; Mark S Wallace; Sara M Wilson; Zirong Zhao; Steven P Cohen Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Date: 2021-11-11 Impact factor: 6.288
Authors: Steven P Cohen; Arun Bhaskar; Anuj Bhatia; Asokumar Buvanendran; Tim Deer; Shuchita Garg; W Michael Hooten; Robert W Hurley; David J Kennedy; Brian C McLean; Jee Youn Moon; Samer Narouze; Sanjog Pangarkar; David Anthony Provenzano; Richard Rauck; B Todd Sitzman; Matthew Smuck; Jan van Zundert; Kevin Vorenkamp; Mark S Wallace; Zirong Zhao Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Date: 2020-04-03 Impact factor: 6.288
Authors: Jonathan M Hagedorn; Timothy R Deer; Steven M Falowski; Abhishek Yadav; Ashley Comer; Zayd Al-Asadi; Alyson M Engle Journal: J Pain Res Date: 2020-12-08 Impact factor: 3.133
Authors: Josiah Bennett; Jack MacGuire; Ena Novakovic; Huey Huynh; Keri Jones; Julian L Gendreau; Antonios Mammis; Mickey E Abraham Journal: Cureus Date: 2021-06-09
Authors: Emil Isagulyan; Konstantin Slavin; Nikolay Konovalov; Eugeny Dorochov; Alexey Tomsky; Andrey Dekopov; Elizaveta Makashova; David Isagulyan; Pavel Genov Journal: Korean J Pain Date: 2020-04-01
Authors: Joachim Runge; Luisa Cassini Ascencao; Christian Blahak; Thomas M Kinfe; Christoph Schrader; Marc E Wolf; Assel Saryyeva; Joachim K Krauss Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2021-08-03 Impact factor: 2.216