Literature DB >> 35469093

The item-specific proportion congruency effect transfers to non-category members based on broad visual similarity.

Brett A Cochrane1, Jay Pratt2.   

Abstract

The item-specific proportion congruency (ISPC) effect-that Stroop effects are reduced for items that are more likely to be incongruent than congruent-indicates that humans have the remarkable capacity to resolve conflict when it is associated with statistical regularities in the environment. It has been demonstrated that an ISPC signal induced by mostly congruent and mostly incongruent inducer items transfers to a set of distinct but visually similar transfer items that are equally likely to be congruent and incongruent; however, it is unclear what the ISPC signal is associated with to allow its transfer. To investigate this issue, an animal Stroop task was used to evaluate whether the ISPC signal would transfer to animal pictures that were different but visually similar same-category members (e.g., retrievers to retrievers, Experiment 1), visually dissimilar same-category members with broadly similar features (e.g., retrievers to bulldogs, Experiment 2), and visually dissimilar different-category members with broadly similar features (e.g., retrievers to house cats, Experiment 3). It was revealed that an ISPC effect was observed for the transfer items of each experiment, suggesting that these conflict signals can be linked based on broad feature similarity.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Associative learning; Conflict adaptation; Item-specific proportion congruency effect; Stroop task

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35469093     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-022-02104-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  5 in total

1.  Why it is too early to lose control in accounts of item-specific proportion congruency effects.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Larry L Jacoby; Swati Chanani
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The Stroop effect: why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency.

Authors:  James R Schmidt; Derek Besner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  When stimulus-driven control settings compete: On the dominance of categories as cues for control.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Abhishek Dey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Converging evidence for control of color-word Stroop interference at the item level.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Keith A Hutchison
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Stroop process dissociations: the relationship between facilitation and interference.

Authors:  D S Lindsay; L L Jacoby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.332

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.