Wei Xu1, Juan Wang2, Jinfu Xu3, Shenyi Li2, Ranran Zhang2, Cong Shen4, Min Xie5, Bo Zheng4, Menghui Gu1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Gusu School, Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou 215002, China. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Human Reproductive and Genetic Center, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214062, China. 3. State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Histology and Embryology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China. 4. State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Center for Reproduction and Genetics, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Gusu School, Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou 215002, China. 5. The Central Laboratory of Birth Defects Prevention and Control, Ningbo Women and Children's Hospital, Ningbo 315012, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Long non-coding (lnc) RNAs are critical regulators in carcinogenesis. The novel lncRNA DEPDC1 antisense RNA 1 (DEPDC1-AS1) was recently associated with poor prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer and lung adenocarcinoma. However, its role in regulating the malignant progression of gastric cancer (GC) and its molecular mechanism are unclear. We herein explored the functions of DEPDC1-AS1 in GC progression. METHODS: DEPDC1-AS1 expression and prognosis in GC tissues were examined by bioinformatics analysis and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The DEPDC1-AS1 function in GC cells was explored by the cell counting kit-8 assay, colony formation assay, Transwell assay, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling, 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine-incorporation, and the xenograft tumor model. The DEPDC1-AS1 and human antigen (Hu)R interaction was determined by RNA pull-down and RNA immunoprecipitation. RESULTS: DEPDC1-AS1 was overexpressed in GC tissues and cell lines, and associated with a worse prognosis in GC patients. In vitro and in vivo assays showed that DEPDC1-AS1 promoted HGC-27 cell proliferation and migration. Mechanistically, DEPDC1-AS1 served as a scaffold by combining with HuR to target the specific mRNA F11R. CONCLUSION: DEPDC1-AS1 plays a crucial role in GC development and progression and is a potential biomarker for the early detection or prognosis of GC.
OBJECTIVE: Long non-coding (lnc) RNAs are critical regulators in carcinogenesis. The novel lncRNA DEPDC1 antisense RNA 1 (DEPDC1-AS1) was recently associated with poor prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer and lung adenocarcinoma. However, its role in regulating the malignant progression of gastric cancer (GC) and its molecular mechanism are unclear. We herein explored the functions of DEPDC1-AS1 in GC progression. METHODS: DEPDC1-AS1 expression and prognosis in GC tissues were examined by bioinformatics analysis and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The DEPDC1-AS1 function in GC cells was explored by the cell counting kit-8 assay, colony formation assay, Transwell assay, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling, 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine-incorporation, and the xenograft tumor model. The DEPDC1-AS1 and human antigen (Hu)R interaction was determined by RNA pull-down and RNA immunoprecipitation. RESULTS: DEPDC1-AS1 was overexpressed in GC tissues and cell lines, and associated with a worse prognosis in GC patients. In vitro and in vivo assays showed that DEPDC1-AS1 promoted HGC-27 cell proliferation and migration. Mechanistically, DEPDC1-AS1 served as a scaffold by combining with HuR to target the specific mRNA F11R. CONCLUSION: DEPDC1-AS1 plays a crucial role in GC development and progression and is a potential biomarker for the early detection or prognosis of GC.
Entities:
Keywords:
DEPDC1 antisense RNA 1; F11R; Gastric cancer; human antigen R; long non-coding RNA; scaffold
Gastric cancer (GC) was the fifth most commonly diagnosed cancer type and the fourth
most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide in 2020.
In recent years, GC incidence rates have increased in Eastern Asia, including
China, Japan, South Korea, and North Korea.
Indeed, GC has become the third leading cause of malignant tumor deaths in
China, with 478,508 estimated new cases diagnosed in 2020, according to data from
the World Health Organization.
The 5-year survival rate of GC is very low in China because most patients are
diagnosed at an advanced stage.
Moreover, despite recent advances in screening, diagnosis, and treatment, the
prognosis of patients with GC is still poor.
This is mainly attributed to the low accuracy of serum tumor biomarkers for
GC, such as pepsinogen I (PGI), PGII, and carcinoembryonic antigen.
Therefore, more effective biomarkers for early GC detection and the
prediction of prognosis are warranted.Recent technological advances in molecular biology, especially in transcriptome
sequencing and bioinformatics, have revealed a complex and diverse range of RNA
molecules. Thousands of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) have been identified, including
small ncRNAs such as microRNAs and long ncRNAs (lncRNAs).
LncRNAs are transcripts longer than 200 nucleotides, which are transcribed by
RNA polymerase II but not translated into proteins.
They act as key regulators in many biological processes such as the cell
cycle, cell proliferation, metabolism, apoptosis, and differentiation.Human antigen R (HuR, also known as ELAVL1) belongs to the human/embryonic lethal
abnormal vision (Hu/ELAVL1) RNA binding protein family.[9,10] It interacts with and
stabilizes mRNAs through binding to U- and AU-rich elements in their 3′-untransalted
regions (UTRs).
HuR is highly expressed in numerous malignant tumors,
where it functions as an mRNA stability factor in response to various
cancer-associated stressors, and binds to specific target mRNAs and translocates to
the cytoplasm.
Recently, HuR was shown to interact with different lncRNAs,
as seen in the lncRNA–RMST interaction in which HuR enhanced DNA
methyltransferase 3 mRNA expression.
We previously demonstrated that lncRNA LINC00707 interacted with HuR to
increase the stability of F11R mRNA, which is associated with GC cell proliferation
and metastasis,
indicating that HuR–F11R is a critical pathway involved in GC malignant
progression.In the current study, we identified and characterized a novel lncRNA, DEPDC1
antisense RNA 1 (DEPDC1-AS1), which is considered to
be a prognosis predictor for triple-negative breast cancer
and lung adenocarcinoma.
A comprehensive analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and
paired GC and healthy tissues demonstrated that DEPDC1-AS1 was
markedly elevated in human GC tissues, while DEPDC1-AS1
overexpression was associated with poor prognosis in patients with GC. Functional
assays revealed that DEPDC1-AS1 silencing inhibited GC cell
proliferation and migration. Mechanistically, HuR was confirmed as a target of
DEPDC1-AS1 that enhanced F11R mRNA stability. This study offers
a better understanding of DEPDC1-AS1-associated regulatory modes in
the development and progression of GC.
Materials and methods
Human tissues
Paired GC tissues and healthy adjacent tissues were obtained from 24 patients who
underwent GC surgery at The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical
University between March 2019 and May 2021. Tissue specimens were stored in
liquid nitrogen. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The
Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (GSKY0233). Patients
provided their written informed consent to participate in the study.
Bioinformatics analysis
GC gene expression data were downloaded from the TCGA dataset and analyzed as
previously described.
The interaction between DEPDC1-AS1 and HuR was predicted
by RNA–Protein Interaction Prediction (RPISeq) (http://pridb.gdcb.iastate.edu/RPISeq/).
Cell culture and transfection
Human GC cell lines (HGC-27, Hs746T, NCI-N87, and AGS) and the normal human
gastric mucosal epithelial cell line GES-1 were obtained from the Chinese
Academy of Cell Collection (Shanghai, China). Cells were cultured in RPMI-1640
medium (Invitrogen, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum at 37°C
with 5% (v/v) CO2 in a water-saturated atmosphere.DEPDC1-AS1 and HuR small interfering (si)RNAs
and the negative control siRNA (si-NC) were transfected into HGC-27 cell lines
with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). siRNA sequences were as follows:
DEPDC1-AS1 1#, 5′-AGAUAGGAGAGCACAUGGC-3′;
DEPDC1-AS1 2#, 5′-UUCUCAGGGUGCAUAUUUC-3′;
HuR 1#, 5′-UGACCAUUGAAACUGGUAA-3′; HuR 2#,
5′-CCUCAAGCCGUUCAGCGUG-3′; and NC, 5′-ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAA-3′. Additionally,
short hairpin (sh)-DEPDC1-AS1,
pcDNA3.1-DEPDC1-AS1, and empty vector were synthesized by
GenePharma (Suzhou, China) and transfected with Lipofectamine 2000. Cells were
harvested and analyzed at 48 hours post-transfection.
RNA extraction and RT-qPCR assays
Total RNA was extracted from HGC-27, Hs746T, NCI-N87, AGS, and GES-1 cells using
TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). First-strand cDNA was synthesized from total RNA
using the PrimeScript RT reagent (Takara, Dalian, China) according to the
manufacturer’s instructions. SYBR Taq (Takara)-based quantitative reverse
transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis was carried out on a
7500 Real-Time PCR instrument (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) under the following
conditions: 95°C for 5 minutes, then 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 seconds and 58°C
for 30 seconds, with a final step at 60°C for 5 minutes. Results were normalized
to 18s rRNA expression. The following primers were used:
DEPDC1-AS1, forward 5′-CGCTCCTCATAGCGAGTCTG-3′ and reverse 5′-TGCCAGGATTGTAGTACGCA-3′;
F11R, forward 5′-ATAGCCGAGGCCACTTTGAC-3′ and reverse 5′-TTCTCCTTCACTTCGGGCAC-3′;
18sRNA, forward 5′-AAACGGCTACCACATCCAAG-3′ and reverse 5′-CCTCCAATGGATCCTCGTTA-3′.
CCK-8 and colony formation assays
HGC-27 cells were inoculated into 96-well plates (3000 cells/well). Cell
viability was assessed every 24 hours using a Cell Counting Kit-8 (Beyotime,
Nantong, China). For colony formation assays, 3 × 103 HGC-27 cells
were plated per well of six-well plates and grown for 2 weeks, during which the
medium of each well was changed every 3 days. Cells were then harvested and
fixed with methanol for 10 minutes before incubating with 0.1% crystal violet
staining solution (Beyotime). Visible colonies were counted using ImagePro Plus
software (Media Cybernetics, San Diego, CA, USA).
Transwell assays
A total of 2.5 × 104 HGC-27 cells per well were seeded in serum-free
medium (Invitrogen) into the upper culture chamber of a 24-well plate with an
8-µm pore size (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Lower chamber wells contained a
medium supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum. After incubation for 48 hours,
cells on the upper membrane were removed, whereas those on the lower membrane
surface were harvested and stained with 0.1% crystal violet.
5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) and terminal deoxynucleotidyl
transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) experiments
EdU experiments were carried out using an EdU labeling/detection kit (Ribobio,
Guangzhou, China) following the manufacturer’s protocol. In brief, transfected
cells were incubated with 50 µM EdU labeling medium for 2 hours, then fixed with
4% paraformaldehyde, and permeabilized using 0.2% Triton X-100. Subsequently,
cells were reacted with an anti-EdU working solution. Finally, EdU-positive
cells were observed and counted under a Zeiss LSM800 confocal laser microscope
(Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).The TUNEL assay was performed using an apoptosis detection kit (Vazyme, Nanjing,
China), as described previously.
Fluorescence microscopy was used to observe and count TUNEL-positive
cells.
In vivo assays
Female athymic BALB/c nude mice (4 weeks old) were maintained under specific
pathogen-free condition and manipulated according to protocols approved by the
Animal Care and Use Committee of Nanjing Medical University. For the cell
proliferation assay, 100 µl of suspended HGC-27 cells transfected with
sh-DEPDC1-AS1 or sh-NC at a concentration of 1 × 107 cells/mL were
injected subcutaneously into the flanks of athymic BALB/c nude mice (n = 6).
Tumors were measured every 3 days, and tumor volumes were calculated by the
formula: V = 0.5 × D × d2 (where V = volume; D = longitudinal
diameter; and d = latitudinal diameter). After 15 days, mice were euthanized,
and the subcutaneous tumors were obtained and imaged. Animal experiments were
approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Nanjing Medical
University (IACUC-2004020).
In vitro transcription, RNA pull-down assay, and western blotting
analysis
In vitro transcription assays were performed using the Ribo™
RNAmax-T7 Biotin RNA Labeling Kit (Ribobio). In brief,
DEPDC1-AS1 was transcribed using T7 RNA polymerase and
labeled with biotin. RNA pull-down experiments were performed using the Pierce™
Magnetic RNA-Protein Pull-Down Kit following the manufacturer’s instructions
(Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Pull-down products were separated by
sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and analyzed by
western blotting using an anti-HuR antibody (Proteintech, Chicago, IL, USA), as
described previously.[20,21] The 3′ UTR of the androgen receptor RNA provided by the
manufacturer was used as the positive control,
and the antisense strand of DEPDC1-AS1 was used as the
negative control.
RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) assays
RIP experiments were performed using a Magna RIP™ RNA-Binding Protein
Immunoprecipitation Kit (Millipore) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In
brief, HGC-27 cells at 80% to 90% confluency were harvested and lysed in a RIP
lysis buffer. The cell extract was incubated with magnetic beads conjugated with
the anti-HuR antibody or control IgG overnight at 4°C. Precipitated RNA was
purified and subjected to RT-qPCR analysis to evaluate the interactions between
HuR and DEPDC1-AS1.
Immunofluorescence
Paraffin-embedded tissues were dewaxed, hydrated, and then subjected to antigen
retrieval in 10 mM citrate for 15 minutes. Sections were blocked with 1% bovine
serum albumin for 2 hours and then incubated with the anti-Ki67 antibody (Abcam,
Cambridge, MA, USA) at a dilution of 1:200 overnight at 4°C and the
corresponding Alexa-Fluor secondary antibodies (Thermo Scientific) for 1 hour at
37°C. Nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Beyotime), and
images were captured using a Zeiss laser confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss,
Oberkochen, Germany).
Statistical analysis
The Student's t-test (two-tailed) and one-way analysis of variance were used to
analyze differences between groups. Survival curves were drawn by a Kaplan–Meier
survival plot and tested with log-rank tests. Gene set enrichment analysis
(GSEA) analysis of pathways associated with DEPDC1-AS1 was based on TCGA
dataset. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 17.0 software (SPSS
Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P values less than 0.05 were recognized as
statistically significant.
Results
Overexpression of DEPDC1-AS1 is correlated with GC malignant progression and
poor prognosis
DEPDC1-AS1 levels were evaluated in 375 human GC and 32 healthy
tissues from the TCGA database, and shown to be significantly overexpressed in
GC tissues (P < 0.01; Figure 1a). GSEA revealed that
DEPDC1-AS1 expression was significantly positively
correlated with the cell cycle and DNA replication in GC tissues
(P = 0.01; Figure 1b). Furthermore, overall
survival and disease-free interval curves showed that
DEPDC1-AS1 overexpression was associated with significantly
worse prognosis in patients with GC (P < 0.05; Figure 1c and d).
DEPDC1-AS1 expression was also significantly up-regulated
in GC tissues compared with healthy adjacent tissues
(P < 0.05; Figure 1e), and significantly higher in GC cell lines than in the
GES-1 cell line (P < 0.05; Figure 1f). Because
DEPDC1-AS1 expression was highest in HGC-27 cells, we used
this cell line for subsequent study.
Figure 1.
DEPDC1-AS1 expression in GC tissues and cell lines, and
its clinical importance. (a) DEPDC1-AS1 expression in
TCGA database. (b) GSEA analysis of DEPDC1-AS1 in GC
tissues. (c,d) Kaplan–Meier analysis of overall survival and
disease-free interval curves in patients with GC. (e)
DEPDC1-AS1 expression in 24 paired GC tissues and
healthy adjacent tissues. (f) DEPDC1-AS1 expression in
GC cell lines (HGC-27, Hs746T, NCI-N87, and AGS) and the normal human
gastric mucosal epithelial cell line GES-1. n = 3 for each group.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01,
***P < 0.01.
DEPDC1 antisense RNA 1, DEPDC1-AS1; GC, gastric cancer; TCGA, the Cancer
Genome Atlas; GSEA, gene set enrichment analysis.
DEPDC1-AS1 expression in GC tissues and cell lines, and
its clinical importance. (a) DEPDC1-AS1 expression in
TCGA database. (b) GSEA analysis of DEPDC1-AS1 in GC
tissues. (c,d) Kaplan–Meier analysis of overall survival and
disease-free interval curves in patients with GC. (e)
DEPDC1-AS1 expression in 24 paired GC tissues and
healthy adjacent tissues. (f) DEPDC1-AS1 expression in
GC cell lines (HGC-27, Hs746T, NCI-N87, and AGS) and the normal human
gastric mucosal epithelial cell line GES-1. n = 3 for each group.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01,
***P < 0.01.DEPDC1 antisense RNA 1, DEPDC1-AS1; GC, gastric cancer; TCGA, the Cancer
Genome Atlas; GSEA, gene set enrichment analysis.
DEPDC1-AS1 knockdown suppresses HGC-27 cell proliferation and migration, and
promotes apoptosis in vitro
To investigate the functions of DEPDC1-AS1 in GC malignant
progression, two independent siRNAs (1# and 2#) were transfected into HGC-27
cells, which significantly reduced DEPDC1-AS1 expression levels
(P < 0.01; Figure 2a). CCK8 and colony formation
assays showed significantly impaired cell viability after
DEPDC1-AS1 downregulation (P < 0.001;
Figure 2b–d).
Transwell assays revealed that DEPDC1-AS1 knockdown
significantly impaired cell migration when compared with the si-NC group
(P < 0.01; Figure 2e and f).
Figure 2.
Effects of DEPDC1-AS1 knockdown on HGC-27 cell viability
and migration in vitro. (a) DEPDC1-AS1
expression in HGC-27 cells transfected with si-NC or
si-DEPDC1-AS1 1# and 2#. n = 3 for each group. (b)
CCK8 assays in HGC-27 cells transfected with si-NC or
si-DEPDC1-AS1. n = 4 for each group. (c, d) Colony
formation assays in HGC-27 cells transfected with si-NC or
si-DEPDC1-AS1. n = 3 for each group. (e, f)
Transwell assays in HGC-27 cells transfected with si-NC or
si-DEPDC1-AS1. n = 3 for each group. Scale bar: 100
µm. **P < 0.01,
***P < 0.001.
Effects of DEPDC1-AS1 knockdown on HGC-27 cell viability
and migration in vitro. (a) DEPDC1-AS1
expression in HGC-27 cells transfected with si-NC or
si-DEPDC1-AS1 1# and 2#. n = 3 for each group. (b)
CCK8 assays in HGC-27 cells transfected with si-NC or
si-DEPDC1-AS1. n = 4 for each group. (c, d) Colony
formation assays in HGC-27 cells transfected with si-NC or
si-DEPDC1-AS1. n = 3 for each group. (e, f)
Transwell assays in HGC-27 cells transfected with si-NC or
si-DEPDC1-AS1. n = 3 for each group. Scale bar: 100
µm. **P < 0.01,
***P < 0.001.DEPDC1 antisense RNA 1, DEPDC1-AS1; si, small interfering; CCK, cell
counting kit.To further explore the reason for compromised viability in
DEPDC1-AS1 knockdown cells, we performed TUNEL staining and
EdU incorporation experiments to test cell proliferation and apoptosis,
respectively. TUNEL staining revealed a significant increase in the proportion
of TUNEL-positive cells in the interference group compared with the control
group (P < 0.05; Figure 3a and b). In contrast, EdU
incorporation showed significantly compromised proliferative activity in
DEPDC1-AS1-knockdown cells (P < 0.05;
Figure 3c and d).
Taken together, our data suggested that DEPDC1-AS1 is an
oncogene in GC.
Figure 3.
Effects of DEPDC1-AS1 knockdown on HGC-27 cell
proliferation and apoptosis. (a, b) TUNEL staining in HGC-27 cells
transfected with si-NC or si-DEPDC1-AS1. n = 3 for each
group. (c, d) EdU incorporation assay in HGC-27 cells transfected with
si-NC or si-DEPDC1-AS1. n = 3 for each group. Scale
bar: 50 µm. *P < 0.05,
***P < 0.001.
DEPDC1 antisense RNA 1, DEPDC1-AS1; terminal deoxynucleotidyl
transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labelling, TUNEL; si, small
interfering; EdU, 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine.
Effects of DEPDC1-AS1 knockdown on HGC-27 cell
proliferation and apoptosis. (a, b) TUNEL staining in HGC-27 cells
transfected with si-NC or si-DEPDC1-AS1. n = 3 for each
group. (c, d) EdU incorporation assay in HGC-27 cells transfected with
si-NC or si-DEPDC1-AS1. n = 3 for each group. Scale
bar: 50 µm. *P < 0.05,
***P < 0.001.DEPDC1 antisense RNA 1, DEPDC1-AS1; terminal deoxynucleotidyl
transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labelling, TUNEL; si, small
interfering; EdU, 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine.
DEPDC1-AS1 knockdown suppresses GC growth in vivo
To evaluate whether DEPDC1-AS1 could influence HGC-27 cell
tumorigenesis in vivo, we injected HGC-27 cells transfected
with sh-DEPDC1-AS1 or its control group (empty vector) into
nude mice. In the course of xenograft tumor development, tumor growth was
significantly slower in the sh-DEPDC1-AS1 group compared with
the control group (P <0.05; Figure 4a). At 15 days postinjection,
xenograft tumors grown from sh-DEPDC1-AS1 cells were
significantly smaller and lighter than those from control cells
(P <0.05; Figure 4b and c). RT-qPCR analysis found
that DEPDC1-AS1 expression levels were significantly decreased
in tumor tissues generated from sh-DEPDC1-AS1 cells
(P < 0.01; Figure 4d). Furthermore,
immunofluorescence staining revealed significantly fewer Ki67-positive cells in
the tumors of DEPDC1-AS1 knockdown cells
(P < 0.01; Figure 4e and f).
Figure 4.
DEPDC1-AS1 knockdown promoted HGC-27 cell tumorigenesis
in vivo. Empty vector or
sh-DEPDC1-AS1 were transfected into HGC-27 cells
and subcutaneously injected into nude mice. (a) Tumor volumes were
measured every 3 days post-injection. (b) Tumors were isolated and
photographed. (c) Tumor weights were measured at the end of the
experiment. (d) RT-qPCR analysis of DEPDC1-AS1
expression in tumors. (e, f) Immunostaining of the proliferation index
factor Ki67 in tumor sections. Scale bar: 50 µm. For (a) to (f), n = 6
for each group. *P < 0.05,
**P < 0.01.
DEPDC1-AS1 knockdown promoted HGC-27 cell tumorigenesis
in vivo. Empty vector or
sh-DEPDC1-AS1 were transfected into HGC-27 cells
and subcutaneously injected into nude mice. (a) Tumor volumes were
measured every 3 days post-injection. (b) Tumors were isolated and
photographed. (c) Tumor weights were measured at the end of the
experiment. (d) RT-qPCR analysis of DEPDC1-AS1
expression in tumors. (e, f) Immunostaining of the proliferation index
factor Ki67 in tumor sections. Scale bar: 50 µm. For (a) to (f), n = 6
for each group. *P < 0.05,
**P < 0.01.DEPDC1 antisense RNA 1, DEPDC1-AS1; sh, short hairpin; RT-qPCR,
quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
DEPDC1-AS1 interacts with the mRNA-stabilizing protein HuR
To further investigate the molecular mechanisms of DEPDC1-AS1 in
GC progression, we employed RPISeq to predict the interaction between
DEPDC1-AS1 and RNA-binding proteins.
DEPDC1-AS1 was found to potentially bind HuR, as both the
RF Classifier and SVM Classifier scores were greater than 0.5 (Figure 5a). Subsequently,
RNA pull-down and RIP experiments confirmed the binding between
DEPDC1-AS1 and HuR (Figure 5b and c). In GC, HuR improves
the stability of mRNA F11R by interacting with LINC00707.
However, whether DEPDC1-AS1 regulates the HuR–F11R axis
is unclear. Therefore, the correlation between DEPDC1-AS1 and
the HuR–F11R axis was explored. F11R mRNA expression was significantly
down-regulated after DEPDC1-AS1 or HuR knockdown in HGC-27
cells (P < 0.001; Figure 5d). Notably, the interaction
between F11R mRNA and HuR was significantly attenuated when
DEPDC1-AS1 was silenced (P < 0.05;
Figure 5e).
Additionally, correlation analysis showed that F11R expression levels were
significantly positively correlated with DEPDC1-AS1 expression
levels in GC tissues (P < 0.001; Figure 5f). We therefore conclude that
DEPDC1-AS1 is involved in the HuR–F11R co-regulatory
effects on GC progression.
Figure 5.
DEPDC1-AS1 interacts with HuR. (a) RNA–protein
interaction prediction between DEPDC1-AS1 and HuR. An
interaction score > 0.5 was considered positive. (b) Western blot
analysis of RNA–protein complexes using an anti-HuR antibody.
Experiments were repeated twice. (c) RIP experiments of
DEPDC1-AS1 binding to HuR in HGC-27 cell lysates.
The relative DEPDC1-AS1 level in HuR RIP is relative to
its control IgG. n = 3 for each group. (d) RT-qPCR analysis of the
relative mRNA expression of F11R after DEPDC1-AS1 or
HuR knockdown in HGC-27 cells. n = 3 for each group. (e) The fold
enrichment of F11R in HuR RIP after DEPDC1-AS1
knockdown in HGC-27 cells. The relative DEPDC1-AS1
level in HuR RIP is relative to its control IgG. n = 3 for each group.
(f) Correlation between DEPDC1-AS1 and F11R expression.
*P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001.
DEPDC1-AS1 interacts with HuR. (a) RNA–protein
interaction prediction between DEPDC1-AS1 and HuR. An
interaction score > 0.5 was considered positive. (b) Western blot
analysis of RNA–protein complexes using an anti-HuR antibody.
Experiments were repeated twice. (c) RIP experiments of
DEPDC1-AS1 binding to HuR in HGC-27 cell lysates.
The relative DEPDC1-AS1 level in HuR RIP is relative to
its control IgG. n = 3 for each group. (d) RT-qPCR analysis of the
relative mRNA expression of F11R after DEPDC1-AS1 or
HuR knockdown in HGC-27 cells. n = 3 for each group. (e) The fold
enrichment of F11R in HuR RIP after DEPDC1-AS1
knockdown in HGC-27 cells. The relative DEPDC1-AS1
level in HuR RIP is relative to its control IgG. n = 3 for each group.
(f) Correlation between DEPDC1-AS1 and F11R expression.
*P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001.DEPDC1 antisense RNA 1, DEPDC1-AS1; HuR, human antigen R; RT-qPCR,
quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
F11R is involved in the oncogene function of DEPDC1-AS1
We conducted rescue experiments to investigate whether F11R was involved in
DEPDC1-AS1-induced GC cell proliferation and migration.
CCK8 and colony formation assay data revealed that co-transfection of
DEPDC1-AS1 siRNA and pcDNA-F11R vector largely rescued
DEPDC1-AS1 knockdown-induced compromised
cell viability (P < 0.01; Figure 6a–c), and cell migration was
also significantly rescued after co-transfection (P < 0.001;
Figure 6d and
e).
Figure 6.
F11R is involved in the oncogene function of DEPDC1-AS1.
(a) CCK8 assays in NC, si-DEPDC1-AS11 #, and pcDNA-F11R
co-transfected HGC-27 cells. n = 4 for each group. (b, c) Colony
formation assay in NC, si-DEPDC1-AS11 #, and pcDNA-F11R
co-transfected HGC-27 cells. n = 3 for each group. (d, e) Transwell
assays in NC, si-DEPDC1-AS11 #, and pcDNA-F11R
co-transfected HGC-27 cells. n = 3 for each group. Scale bar: 100 µm.
**P < 0.01,
***P < 0.001.
F11R is involved in the oncogene function of DEPDC1-AS1.
(a) CCK8 assays in NC, si-DEPDC1-AS11 #, and pcDNA-F11R
co-transfected HGC-27 cells. n = 4 for each group. (b, c) Colony
formation assay in NC, si-DEPDC1-AS11 #, and pcDNA-F11R
co-transfected HGC-27 cells. n = 3 for each group. (d, e) Transwell
assays in NC, si-DEPDC1-AS11 #, and pcDNA-F11R
co-transfected HGC-27 cells. n = 3 for each group. Scale bar: 100 µm.
**P < 0.01,
***P < 0.001.DEPDC1 antisense RNA 1, DEPDC1-AS1; CCK, cell counting kit; si, small
interfering.
Discussion
GC is one of the most common malignancies worldwide, and several oncogenic pathways
that may contribute to GC carcinogenesis have been reported in recent
years.[23,24] Multiple lncRNAs act as oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes
during carcinogenesis and can also serve as prognostic markers of GC.[25-27] LncRNA-mediated regulation of
signaling pathways in cancer has been shown to be involved in various mechanisms,
which are mainly attributed to their interaction with DNA, RNA, or protein. These
include: (1) targeting specific DNA binding proteins to reduce their access to DNA
recognition elements,
(2) miRNA targeting of lncRNAs to trigger their decay,
and (3) the selective regulation of mRNA stability of specific genes by
interacting with target proteins.DEPCE-AS1, a novel lncRNA, was recently associated with the
prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer
and lung adenocarcinoma.
However, changes in the expression of DEPDC1-AS1 in GC are
poorly understood. Here, we found that DEPDC1-AS1 was overexpressed
in GC tissues and cell lines, while loss-of-function assays verified that excessive
DEPDC1-AS1 promoted HGC-27 cell line proliferation and
migration and that this function was attributed to its interaction with HuR. These
findings indicate that DEPDC1-AS1 acts as an oncogene in GC
development, and can be used as a potential biomarker of GC prognosis.F11R, also known as junctional adhesion molecule-A, is a member of the immunoglobulin
superfamily originally identified from the surface of human platelets, and is a
crucial regulator of tight junction assembly in epithelia.[30,31] Various studies have focused
on its role in cancers. These include the hypoxic induction of lncRNA
NEAT1, which leads to the retention of F11R within the nucleus
and correlates with poor survival in patients with breast cancer.
Moreover, Zhang et al. revealed that overexpression of F11R mRNA correlated
with non-small cell lung cancer progression.[32,33] We previously reported an
interaction between LINC00707 and HuR in which HuR increased the stability of F11R
mRNA, and verified the role of the HuR–F11R pathway in GC malignant progression.
This earlier study found that the 3′-UTR of F11R interacted with HuR, while
RIP analysis demonstrated the high binding capacity of F11R for HuR protein.The current study confirmed that DEPDC1-AS1 binds HuR, and showed
that it functions as a scaffold to regulate F11R at the transcriptional level.
Bioinformatics and mRNA expression analysis revealed a positive correlation between
DEPDC1-AS1 and F11R, which was demonstrated to be a strong
binding relationship by RNA pull-down and RIP assays, while in
vitro loss-of-function assays showed that F11R regulation is
potentially involved in the oncogene function of DEPDC1-AS1.In conclusion, our results reveal GC-associated DEPDC1-AS1 to be an
oncogenic lncRNA that promotes the proliferation and invasion of HGC-27 cells by
serving as a scaffold, and combines with HuR to target F11R mRNA. Our findings
support a role for DEPDC1-AS1 in GC development and progression and
suggest that it could be used as an effective biomarker for the early detection or
prognosis of GC.
Authors: H Choudhry; A Albukhari; M Morotti; S Haider; D Moralli; J Smythies; J Schödel; C M Green; C Camps; F Buffa; P Ratcliffe; J Ragoussis; A L Harris; D R Mole Journal: Oncogene Date: 2014-11-24 Impact factor: 9.867