| Literature DB >> 35460952 |
Marta Galvez-Fernandez1, Francisco Sanchez-Saez2, Arce Domingo-Relloso3, Zulema Rodriguez-Hernandez4, Sonia Tarazona5, Vannina Gonzalez-Marrachelli6, Maria Grau-Perez7, Jose M Morales-Tatay8, Nuria Amigo9, Tamara Garcia-Barrera10, Jose L Gomez-Ariza10, F Javier Chaves11, Ana Barbara Garcia-Garcia11, Rebeca Melero12, Maria Tellez-Plaza13, Juan C Martin-Escudero14, Josep Redon12, Daniel Monleon15.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Limited studies have evaluated the joint influence of redox-related metals and genetic variation on metabolic pathways. We analyzed the association of 11 metals with metabolic patterns, and the interacting role of candidate genetic variants, in 1145 participants from the Hortega Study, a population-based sample from Spain.Entities:
Keywords: Candidate genes; Gene-environment interaction; Metabolomics; Metals; Oxidative stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35460952 PMCID: PMC9048061 DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102314
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Redox Biol ISSN: 2213-2317 Impact factor: 10.787
Participant characteristics in subgroups defined by median metabolic principal component (mPC) levels in the Hortega Study (N = 1,145).
| mPC1 | mPC2 | mPC3 | mPC4 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≤0.27 | >0.27 | ≤0.03 | >0.03 | ≤-0.13 | >-0.13 | ≤-0.12 | >-0.12 | |
| Female %, (N) | 37.7 (224) | 64.36 (343) | 51.69 (283) | 50.33 (284) | 51.03 (274) | 50.99 (293) | 29.03 (158) | 73.07 (409) |
| Age (years), Mean (SE) | 52.26 (0.52) | 44.95 (0.49) | 49.73 (0.52) | 47.48 (0.52) | 44.04 (0.5) | 53.18 (0.51) | 45.73 (0.47) | 51.5 (0.49) |
| Never Smoker, % (N) | 39.94 (252) | 49.82 (282) | 45.21 (265) | 44.54 (269) | 44.4 (253) | 45.35 (281) | 38.96 (225) | 50.81 (309) |
| Former Smoker, % (N) | 31.07 (195) | 25.94 (148) | 30.37 (180) | 26.65 (163) | 27.64 (167) | 29.38 (176) | 31.03 (182) | 25.98 (161) |
| Current Smoker, % (N) | 28.99 (146) | 24.23 (122) | 24.43 (124) | 28.81 (144) | 27.95 (145) | 25.28 (123) | 30.00 (150) | 23.22 (118) |
| Alcohol intake (gr/day), Mean (SE) | 14.48 (1.08) | 8.99 (0.75) | 12.45 (1.06) | 11.03 (0.78) | 12.79 (0.93) | 10.69 (0.93) | 13.83 (0.94) | 9.65 (0.93) |
| Obesity, % (N) | 23.45 (141) | 10.31 (61) | 17.77 (106) | 16.13 (96) | 13.36 (79) | 20.58 (123) | 18.02 (105) | 15.91 (97) |
| Diabetes, % (N) | 10.26 (79) | 1.99 (15) | 6.73 (52) | 5.52 (42) | 6.37 (49) | 5.88 (45) | 7.08 (55) | 5.17 (39) |
| High cholesterol, % (N) | 60.53 (363) | 45.59 (255) | 63.73 (366) | 42.4 (252) | 23.98 (148) | 82.21 (470) | 48.49 (273) | 57.67 (345) |
| Total triglycerides (mg/dL), Mean (SE) | 238.2 (5.13) | 112.1 (1.45) | 197.1 (5.25) | 153.3 (3.44) | 162.9 (4.2) | 187.6 (4.78) | 181.5 (4.66) | 168.9 (4.4) |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73m2), Mean (SE) | 90.3 (0.77) | 98.2 (0.7) | 92.4 (0.77) | 96.0 (0.72) | 98.0 (0.73) | 90.4 (0.75) | 96.1 (0.72) | 92.3 (0.75) |
| Exercise <3000 METs min/week, % (N) | 41.74 (245) | 38.88 (208) | 39.95 (223) | 40.67 (230) | 41.81 (234) | 38.81 (219) | 44.05 (247) | 36.57 (206) |
Abbreviations: SE: standard error; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Mean difference (MD) (95% CI) of metabolic principal components (mPC1 to mPC4) comparing the 80th to the 20th percentile of the urine metal distribution in adult participants from the Hortega Study (N = 1,145).
| mPC1 | mPC2 | mPC3 | mPC4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urine Co (μg/g) | ||||
| MD (95% CI) | −0.02 (−0.07, 0.03) | −0.05 (−0.13, 0.03) | −0.10 (−0.19, −0.02) | 0.05 (−0.02, 0.12) |
| P value | 0.43 | 0.20 | 0.02 | 0.18 |
| Plasma Cu (μg/dL) | ||||
| MD (95% CI) | −0.10 (−0.16, −0.05) | 0.03 (−0.07, 0.12) | 0.20 (0.10, 0.30) | 0.08 (−0.02, 0.18) |
| P value | <0.001 | 0.60 | <0.001 | 0.11 |
| Urine Mo (μg/g) | ||||
| MD (95% CI) | −0.01 (−0.05, 0.04) | −0.07 (−0.15, 0.02) | −0.08 (−0.16, 0.01) | 0.03 (−0.05, 0.11) |
| P value | 0.75 | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.42 |
| Plasma Se (μg/L) | ||||
| MD (95% CI) | 0.06 (0.01, 0.10) | −0.20 (−0.35, −0.05) | 0.16 (0.07, 0.26) | 0.02 (−0.06, 0.10) |
| P value | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.61 |
| Plasma Zn (μg/dL) | ||||
| MD (95% CI) | 0.07 (0.01, 0.13) | −0.15 (−0.27, −0.04) | 0.19 (0.07, 0.30) | −0.15 (−0.23, −0.06) |
| P value | 0.02 | 0.007 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Urine As (μg/g) | ||||
| MD (95% CI) | −0.05 (−0.09, 0.00) | −0.03 (−0.11, 0.06) | −0.02 (−0.11, 0.07) | 0.03 (−0.05, 0.11) |
| P value | 0.03 | 0.54 | 0.65 | 0.44 |
| Urine Ba (μg/g) | ||||
| MD (95% CI) | 0.00 (−0.04, 0.05) | −0.03 (−0.12, 0.06) | −0.07 (−0.16, 0.02) | −0.01 (−0.09, 0.07) |
| P value | 0.88 | 0.55 | 0.11 | 0.84 |
| Urine Cd (μg/g) | ||||
| MD (95% CI) | 0.01 (−0.04, 0.05) | −0.18 (−0.33, −0.04) | −0.06 (−0.15, 0.03) | 0.02 (−0.06, 0.10) |
| P value | 0.76 | 0.01 | 0.17 | 0.66 |
| Urine Cr (μg/g) | ||||
| MD (95% CI) | −0.03 (−0.07, 0.02) | 0.01 (−0.08, 0.11) | −0.05 (−0.14, 0.04) | 0.05 (−0.04, 0.13) |
| P value | 0.26 | 0.83 | 0.26 | 0.30 |
| Urine Sb (μg/g) | ||||
| MD (95% CI) | −0.08 (−0.15, 0.00) | 0.03 (−0.06, 0.11) | −0.03 (−0.11, 0.06) | 0.15 (0.01, 0.30) |
| P value | 0.04 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.04 |
| Urine V (μg/g) | ||||
| MD (95% CI) | −0.04 (−0.08, 0.01) | 0.02 (−0.08, 0.11) | −0.05 (−0.14, 0.04) | 0.05 (−0.03, 0.13) |
| P value | 0.11 | 0.76 | 0.25 | 0.23 |
Model adjusted for age (years), sex (male and female), education (
The 80th and 20th percentiles of essential metals biomarkers distributions were 0.63 and 0.12 μg/g for Co, 126.8 and 70.9 μg/dL for Cu, 58.6 and 10.7 μg/g for Mo, 103.6 and 68.8 μg/L for Se and 99.6 and 61.2 μg/dL for Zn; and for non-essential metals were 13.2 and 3.3 μg/g for As, 120.5 and 28.8 μg/g for Ba, 0.75 and 0.19 μg/g for Cd, 6.5 and 1.9 μg/g for Cr, 0.2 and 0.03 μg/g for Sb, and 3.8 and 1.2 μg/g for V.
Non-linear associations with corresponding metals modeled as restricted quadratic splines.
Fig. 1Posterior mean of the difference in mPC1 and mPC2 scores by antimony and cadmium levels, when molybdenum and selenium, respectively, are fixed at its 10th, 50th and 90th percentiles.
Flexible dose responses were estimated form a Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression (BKMR) model adjusted for age (years, splines), sex (men and women education (
Fig. 2Enriched KEGG pathways out of the union set of redox-related genes from single nucleotide polymorphisms interacting with metals across all mPCs.
Overall integrative network showing the statistically significant KEGG pathways from hypergeometric enrichment analysis (P value ≤ 0.05), which was conducted out of the union set of genes annotated to SNPs interacting with metals considering all 4 mPCs. KEGG pathways are represented as large nodes and the node size is directly proportional to the term enrichment -log10 P value (larger nodes reflect higher statistical significance). Nodes with the same colors reflect they belong to the same clustering group according to an estimated Kappa score. The nodes with colored letters represent the most significant pathways per clustering group. The equally sized smallest nodes with annotated red gene symbols can be filled with more than one color indicating that they are contributing to different pathways clustered in different groups. The metals are indicated using black characters, and the corresponding black dashed line indicates that the interaction term in gene-environment interaction regression analysis was associated with a P value < 0.001. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)