| Literature DB >> 35458788 |
Jiahui Wang1, Hui Liu1, Meng Liu1, Yanjing Yang1, Shian Zhong1.
Abstract
In recent years, the structure of selenium-enriched polysaccharides and their application in immunomodulation have attracted much attention. In previous studies, we extracted and purified a novel selenium-enriched Pleurotus ostreatus polysaccharide called Se-POP-21, but its structure and immunomodulatory activity were still unclear. In this study, the main structural unit formula of Se-POP-21 was characterized by methylation analysis and an NMR experiment. The results showed that the backbone of Se-POP-21 was →[2,6)-α-D-Galp-(1→6)-α-D-Galp-(1]4→2,4)-β-L-Arap-(1→[2,6)-α-D-Galp-(1→6)-α-D-Galp-(1]4→, branched chain of β-D-Manp-(1→ and β-D-Manp-(1→4)-β-L-Arap-(1→ connected with →2,6)-α-D-Galp-(1→ and →2,4)-β-L-Arap-(1→,respectively, through the O-2 bond. In vitro cell experiments indicated that Se-POP-21 could significantly enhance the proliferation and phagocytosis of RAW264.7 cells, upregulate the expression of costimulatory molecules CD80/CD86, and promote RAW264.7 cells to secrete NO, ROS, TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 by activating the NF-κB protein. The results of this study indicate that Se-POP-21 can effectively activate RAW264.7 cells. Thus, it has the potential to be used in immunomodulatory drugs or functional foods.Entities:
Keywords: Pleurotus ostreatus; immunomodulatory activity; selenium-enriched polysaccharides
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35458788 PMCID: PMC9027278 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27082591
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
GC–MS data of methylation analysis of Se-POP-21.
| Methylated Sugar | Molar Ratio | Mass Fragments (m/z) | Retention Time | Type of Linkage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,3,4,6-Me4-Manp | 0.325 | 43, 71, 87, 101, 117, 129, 145, 161, 205 | 15.35 | Manp-(1→ |
| 2,3,4,6-Me4-Galp | 0.012 | 43, 71, 87, 101, 117, 129, 145, 161, 205 | 16.03 | Galp-(1→ |
| 2,4-Me2-Arap | 0.016 | 43, 59, 101, 117, 129, 174, 201, 233 | 17.99 | →3)-Arap-(1→ |
| 2,3-Me2-Arap | 0.041 | 43, 87, 101, 117, 129, 161, 189, 233 | 19.02 | →4)-Arap-(1→ |
| 2,3,4,-Me3-Galp | 0.280 | 43, 87, 99, 101, 117, 129, 161, 189, 233 | 20.17 | →6)-Galp-(1→ |
| 3-Me-Arap | 0.039 | 43, 71, 87, 99, 129, 159, 189,233 | 20.87 | →2,4)-Arap-(1→ |
| 3,4,-Me2-Galp | 0.287 | 43, 71, 87, 99, 129, 173, 189, 233 | 22.90 | →2,6)-Galp-(1→ |
Figure 11H NMR (a), 13C NMR (b), HSQC (c), COSY (d), NOESY (e), and HMBC (f) spectra of Se-POP-21. A–E in Figure (a) and (b) are the signal peaks of anomeric hydrogen and anomeric carbon, respectively.
The chemical shifts and analysis results of 13C and 1H of the residues.
| Residues | H1/C1 | H2/C2 | H3/C3 | H4/C4 | H5a/C5 | H5b/C5 | H6a/C6 | H6b/C6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 4.74 | 4.03 | 3.56 | 3.33 | 3.54 | 3.70 | 3.87 | |
| β-D-Manp-(1→ | 101.62 | 70.32 | 72.55 | 66.78 | 76.21 | 61.07 | 61.07 | |
| B | 4.89 | 3.77 | 3.54 | 3.33 | 3.87 | 3.71 | ||
| →4)-β-L-Arap-(1→ | 98.15 | 66.89 | 66.51 | 76.26 | 61.04 | 61.04 | ||
| C | 4.94 | 3.79 | 3.89 | 4.05 | 3.58 | 3.86 | 3.65 | |
| →6)- α-D-Galp-(1→ | 97.66 | 68.25 | 68.52 | 68.95 | 70.83 | 66.66 | 66.66 | |
| D | 4.86 | 3.64 | 4.24 | 3.49 | 3.88 | 3.71 | ||
| →2,4)- β-L-Arap-(1→ | 98.68 | 78.11 | 65.15 | 78.78 | 61.04 | 61.04 | ||
| E | 5.06 | 3.90 | 4.14 | 3.96 | 3.84 | 3.64 | 3.86 | |
| →2,6)- α-D-Galp-(1→ | 98.34 | 76.97 | 68.96 | 69.35 | 69.53 | 66.65 | 66.65 |
Figure 2The main structural unit formula of Se-POP-21.
Figure 3Effects of Se-POP-21 on RAW264.7 cells’ viability. The data are expressed as mean ± SD; ** p < 0.01 compared with the control group.
Figure 4Effects of Se-POP-21 on the phagocytosis of RAW 264.7 cells. The data are expressed as mean ± SD; ** p < 0.01 compared with the control group.
Figure 5Effects of Se-POP-21 on the expression of CD80 (a) and CD86 (b) in RAW264.7 cells, as measured by flow cytometry. The data are expressed as mean ± SD; ** p < 0.01 compared with the control group.
Figure 6Effects of Se-POP-21 on the ROS levels of RAW264.7 cells, as measured by flow cytometry. The data are expressed as mean ± SD; ** p < 0.01 compared with the control group.
Figure 7Effect of Se-POP-21 on the NO secretion of RAW264.7 cells. The data are expressed as mean ± SD; ** p < 0.01 compared with the control group.
Figure 8Effects of Se-POP-21 on the secretion of TNF-α (a), IL-1β (b), and IL-6 (c) by RAW264.7 cells. The data are expressed as mean ± SD; ** p < 0.01 compared with the control group.
Figure 9Effect of Se-POP-21 on the NF-κB protein expression in RAW264.7 cells. The data are expressed as mean ± SD; ** p < 0.01 compared with the control group.