| Literature DB >> 35458578 |
Bin Du1,2,3, Fei Peng1,2,3, Ying Xie1,2,3, Huiying Wang1,2,3, Jinhui Wu1,2,3, Chang Liu1,2,3, Yuedong Yang1,2,3.
Abstract
The present work is conducted to investigate the optimal extraction technology of polysaccharide from chestnut mushroom (Agrocybe aegerita) using a new method based on accelerated solvent extraction combined with response surface methodology (ASE-RSM). The conventional reflux extraction (CRE) method and ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) method were also carried out. Additionally, the in vitro antioxidant activities, including ABTS and DPPH assay, were evaluated. The RSM method, based on a three level and three variable Box-Behnken design (BBD), was developed to obtain the optimal combination of extraction conditions. In brief, the polysaccharide was optimally extracted with water as extraction solvent, extraction temperature of 71 °C, extraction time of 6.5 min, number of cycles of 3, and extraction pressure of 10 MPa. The 3D response surface plot and the contour plot derived from the mathematical models were applied to determine the optimal conditions. Under the above conditions, the experimental value of polysaccharide yield was 19.77 ± 0.12%, which is in close agreement with the value (19.81%) predicted by the model. These findings demonstrate that ASE-RSM produce much higher polysaccharide and consumed environmentally friendly extraction and solvent systems, have less extraction discrimination and shorter time and provide scientific basis for industrialization of polysaccharide extraction. Moreover, it was proved that the polysaccharide had the potential ability to scavenge ABTS and DPPH.Entities:
Keywords: accelerated solvent extraction; antioxidant activity; chestnut mushroom; polysaccharide; response surface methodology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35458578 PMCID: PMC9027027 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27082380
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Yields of crude polysaccharide with different extraction methods.
| Extraction Methods | Extraction Time | Extraction Temperatures | Extraction Pressure (MPa) | Extraction Power (W) | Yield of Crude Polysaccharide (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASE | 6.5 min | 71 °C | 10 | - | 19% |
| CRE | 2 h | 100 °C | - | - | 3.2% |
| UAE | 1 h | 50 °C | - | 100 | 1.3% |
Figure 1Effects of different extraction parameters on extraction yield of crude polysaccharide from mushroom (a) extraction temperature, °C; (b) extraction time, min; (c) number of cycles.
Box–Behnken design and observed responses a.
| Run | Independent Variable | Response ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60 (−1) | 4 (−1) | 2 (0) | 11.56 ± 0.02 |
| 2 | 80 (+1) | 4 (−1) | 2 (0) | 12.72 ± 0.04 |
| 3 | 60 (−1) | 8 (+1) | 2 (0) | 16.92 ± 0.05 |
| 4 | 80 (+1) | 8 (+1) | 2 (0) | 15.33 ± 0.09 |
| 5 | 60 (−1) | 6 (0) | 1 (−1) | 10.22 ± 0.09 |
| 6 | 80 (+1) | 6 (0) | 1 (−1) | 12.38 ± 0.03 |
| 7 | 60 (−1) | 6 (0) | 3 (+1) | 15.52 ± 0.05 |
| 8 | 80 (+1) | 6 (0) | 3 (+1) | 14.74 ± 0.04 |
| 9 | 70 (0) | 4 (−1) | 1 (−1) | 13.75 ± 0.02 |
| 10 | 70 (0) | 8 (+1) | 1 (−1) | 12.44 ± 0.01 |
| 11 | 70 (0) | 4 (−1) | 2 (0) | 17.72 ± 0.08 |
| 12 | 70 (0) | 8 (+1) | 3 (+1) | 18.20 ± 0.07 |
| 13 | 70 (0) | 6 (0) | 2 (0) | 19.22 ± 0.05 |
| 14 | 70 (0) | 6 (0) | 2 (0) | 19.29 ± 0.03 |
| 15 | 70 (0) | 6 (0) | 2 (0) | 19.23 ± 0.03 |
| 16 | 70 (0) | 6 (0) | 2 (0) | 19.20 ± 0.04 |
| 17 | 70 (0) | 6 (0) | 2 (0) | 19.10 ± 0.09 |
a: Average value of triplicate experiments.
ANOVA for the fitted quadratic polynomial model of extraction of crude polysaccharide.
| Source | Sum of | DF | Mean | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 145.26 | 9 | 16.14 | 10.64 | 0.0025 |
| Residual | 10.61 | 7 | 1.52 | ||
| Lack of fit | 10.60 | 3 | 3.53 | 784.11 | <0.0001 |
| Pure error | 0.018 | 4 | 4.50 × 10−3 | ||
| Cor total | 155.87 | 16 | |||
| CV = 7.82 |
Estimated regression model of relationship between response variable (yield of crude polysaccharide) and independent variables (A, B, and C).
| Variables | Sum of | DF | Mean | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.12 | 1 | 0.12 | 0.076 | 0.7906 |
|
| 6.35 | 1 | 6.35 | 4.19 | 0.0799 |
|
| 37.79 | 1 | 37.79 | 24.92 | 0.0016 |
|
| 1.89 | 1 | 1.89 | 1.24 | 0.3.13 |
|
| 2.16 | 1 | 2.16 | 1.43 | 0.2713 |
|
| 0.79 | 1 | 0.79 | 0.52 | 0.4928 |
|
| 57.46 | 1 | 57.46 | 37.89 | 0.0005 |
|
| 8.05 | 1 | 8.05 | 5.31 | 0.0547 |
|
| 22.24 | 1 | 22.24 | 14.67 | 0.0065 |
Figure 2Response surface plots showing the interaction effects of extraction time and extraction temperature (a), number of cycles and extraction temperature (b), and number of cycles and extraction time (c) on the yield of crude polysaccharide.
Figure 3FT-IR spectrum of crude polysaccharide in the range of 4000–400 cm−1.
Figure 4In vitro antioxidant activity assessment DPPH radical scavenging activity of polysaccharide from chestnut mushroom. Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 5In vitro antioxidant activity assessment of ABTS radical scavenging activity of polysaccharide from chestnut mushroom. Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3).